• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血管加压素起始时机与感染性休克患者死亡率的关系:对 MIMIC-III 和 MIMIC-IV 数据库的分析。

Timing of vasopressin initiation and mortality in patients with septic shock: analysis of the MIMIC-III and MIMIC-IV databases.

机构信息

Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, Zhejiang Province, P. R. China.

Key Laboratory of Clinical Evaluation Technology for Medical Device of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, P.R. China.

出版信息

BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Apr 3;23(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08147-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12879-023-08147-6
PMID:37013474
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10071631/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

vasopressin is commonly used as a second-line vasopressor for patients with septic shock, but the optimal timing of initiation is uncertain. This study was designed to investigate when vasopressin initiation may be beneficial for 28-day mortality in septic shock patients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational cohort study from the MIMIC-III v1.4 and MIMIC-IV v2.0 databases. All adults diagnosed with septic shock according to Sepsis-3 criteria were included. Patients were stratified into two groups based on norepinephrine (NE) dose at the time of vasopressin initiation, defined as the low doses of NE group (NE<0.25 µg/kg/min) and the high doses of NE group (NE ≥ 0.25 µg/kg/min). The primary end-point was 28-day mortality after diagnosis of septic shock. The analysis involved propensity score matching (PSM), multivariable logistic regression, doubly robust estimation, the gradient boosted model, and an inverse probability-weighting model.

RESULTS

A total of 1817 eligible patients were included in our original cohort (613 in the low doses of NE group and 1204 in the high doses of NE group). After 1:1 PSM, 535 patients from each group with no difference in disease severity were included in the analysis. The results showed that vasopressin initiation at low doses of NE was associated with reduced 28-day mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.660, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.518-0.840, p < 0.001). Compared with patients in the high doses of NE group, patients in the low doses of NE group received significantly shorter duration of NE, with less intravenous fluid volume on the first day after initiation of vasopressin, more urine on the second day, and longer mechanical ventilation-free days and CRRT-free days. Nevertheless, there were no significant differences in hemodynamic response to vasopressin, duration of vasopressin, and ICU or hospital length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Among adults with septic shock, vasopressin initiation when low-dose NE was used was associated with an improvement in 28-day mortality.

摘要

背景

加压素通常被用作脓毒性休克患者的二线血管加压药,但启动的最佳时机仍不确定。本研究旨在探讨加压素启动时对脓毒性休克患者 28 天死亡率的影响。

方法

这是一项来自 MIMIC-III v1.4 和 MIMIC-IV v2.0 数据库的回顾性观察性队列研究。所有根据 Sepsis-3 标准诊断为脓毒性休克的成年人都被纳入研究。根据加压素启动时去甲肾上腺素(NE)剂量将患者分为两组,定义为低剂量 NE 组(NE<0.25 µg/kg/min)和高剂量 NE 组(NE≥0.25 µg/kg/min)。主要终点为脓毒性休克诊断后 28 天的死亡率。分析包括倾向评分匹配(PSM)、多变量逻辑回归、双重稳健估计、梯度提升模型和逆概率加权模型。

结果

共有 1817 名符合条件的患者纳入原始队列(低剂量 NE 组 613 名,高剂量 NE 组 1204 名)。经过 1:1 PSM 后,每组各有 535 名疾病严重程度无差异的患者纳入分析。结果显示,低剂量 NE 启动加压素与降低 28 天死亡率相关(比值比 [OR] 0.660,95%置信区间 [CI] 0.518-0.840,p<0.001)。与高剂量 NE 组相比,低剂量 NE 组患者接受 NE 的时间明显缩短,加压素启动后第 1 天的静脉输液量更少,第 2 天的尿量更多,机械通气无天数和 CRRT 无天数更长。然而,两组间对加压素的血流动力学反应、加压素持续时间以及 ICU 或住院时间均无显著差异。

结论

在脓毒性休克成人中,使用低剂量 NE 时启动加压素与 28 天死亡率的改善相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9ec/10071631/ec6cadf27b07/12879_2023_8147_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9ec/10071631/af72a5a00051/12879_2023_8147_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9ec/10071631/be8d51942c99/12879_2023_8147_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9ec/10071631/ec6cadf27b07/12879_2023_8147_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9ec/10071631/af72a5a00051/12879_2023_8147_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9ec/10071631/be8d51942c99/12879_2023_8147_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9ec/10071631/ec6cadf27b07/12879_2023_8147_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Timing of vasopressin initiation and mortality in patients with septic shock: analysis of the MIMIC-III and MIMIC-IV databases.血管加压素起始时机与感染性休克患者死亡率的关系:对 MIMIC-III 和 MIMIC-IV 数据库的分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Apr 3;23(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08147-6.
2
Effect of early vasopressin combined with norepinephrine on short-term mortality in septic shock: A retrospective study based on the MIMIC-IV database.基于 MIMIC-IV 数据库的回顾性研究:早期血管加压素联合去甲肾上腺素对脓毒性休克短期死亡率的影响。
Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Jul;69:188-194. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.04.040. Epub 2023 May 3.
3
asopressin nitiation as a econd-Line Vasoressor in Early eptic hock (VISPSS).作为早期感染性休克(VISPSS)二线血管加压药物的血管加压素起始治疗。
J Intensive Care Med. 2024 Apr;39(4):306-312. doi: 10.1177/08850666231201364. Epub 2023 Sep 16.
4
Efficacy and Outcomes After Vasopressin Guideline Implementation in Septic Shock.血管加压素指南在感染性休克中的实施效果及结果
Ann Pharmacother. 2017 Jan;51(1):13-20. doi: 10.1177/1060028016669163. Epub 2016 Oct 1.
5
Association of Catecholamine Dose, Lactate, and Shock Duration at Vasopressin Initiation With Mortality in Patients With Septic Shock.脓毒性休克患者开始使用血管加压素时儿茶酚胺剂量、乳酸水平和休克持续时间与死亡率的关联
Crit Care Med. 2022 Apr 1;50(4):614-623. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005317.
6
Efficacy and Safety of Vasopressin as First-Line Treatment of Distributive and Hemorrhagic Shock States.血管加压素作为分布性和出血性休克状态一线治疗的疗效和安全性。
Ann Pharmacother. 2020 Mar;54(3):213-218. doi: 10.1177/1060028019882035. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
7
Mortality, Morbidity, and Costs After Implementation of a Vasopressin Guideline in Medical Intensive Care Patients With Septic Shock: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis.在脓毒性休克的重症监护患者中实施血管加压素指南后的死亡率、发病率和成本:一项中断时间序列分析。
Ann Pharmacother. 2020 Apr;54(4):314-321. doi: 10.1177/1060028019886306. Epub 2019 Nov 3.
8
Addition of vasopressin to norepinephrine as independent predictor of mortality in patients with refractory septic shock: an observational study.在难治性感染性休克患者中,血管加压素联合去甲肾上腺素作为死亡率的独立预测因素:一项观察性研究。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2007 Apr;8(2):189-200. doi: 10.1089/sur.2006.003.
9
Vasopressin versus norepinephrine infusion in patients with septic shock.脓毒性休克患者中血管加压素与去甲肾上腺素输注的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Feb 28;358(9):877-87. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa067373.
10
Norepinephrine and Vasopressin Compared With Norepinephrine and Epinephrine in Adults With Septic Shock.去甲肾上腺素和血管加压素与去甲肾上腺素和肾上腺素治疗脓毒性休克成人患者的比较。
Ann Pharmacother. 2019 Sep;53(9):877-885. doi: 10.1177/1060028019843664. Epub 2019 Apr 8.

引用本文的文献

1
ChronoSynthNet: a dual-task deep learning model development and validation study for predicting real-time norepinephrine dosage and the early detection of hypotension in patients with septic shock.ChronoSynthNet:一种用于预测感染性休克患者实时去甲肾上腺素剂量和早期低血压检测的双任务深度学习模型开发与验证研究。
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2025 Aug 30;15(4):833-846. doi: 10.21037/cdt-2025-265. Epub 2025 Aug 27.
2
Early multimodal vasopressor strategy in septic shock (TRICYCLE)-Study protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial.脓毒性休克早期多模式血管升压药策略(TRICYCLE)——一项随机对照临床试验的研究方案
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 29;20(8):e0331304. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331304. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
When to start vasopressin in septic shock: the strategy we propose.脓毒性休克时何时开始使用血管加压素:我们提出的策略。
Crit Care. 2022 May 6;26(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04001-4.
2
Machine learning to predict vasopressin responsiveness in patients with septic shock.机器学习预测脓毒性休克患者对血管加压素的反应性。
Pharmacotherapy. 2022 Jun;42(6):460-471. doi: 10.1002/phar.2683. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
3
Vasopressor Choice and Timing in Vasodilatory Shock.血管扩张性休克中血管活性药物的选择与时机
Vasopressin Initiation Timing and In-Hospital Mortality in Septic Shock: An Observational Study of Large Public Databases.
脓毒性休克中血管加压素起始时机与院内死亡率:大型公共数据库的观察性研究
Crit Care Explor. 2025 Aug 22;7(9):e1284. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001284. eCollection 2025 Sep 1.
4
Vasopressin and its analogues in patients with septic shock: holy Grail or unfulfilled promise?血管加压素及其类似物在感染性休克患者中的应用:圣杯还是未兑现的承诺?
Crit Care. 2025 Jul 29;29(1):333. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05540-2.
5
Vasopressin use across shock states: international insights from an international ESICM-endorsed survey: the PRESS Survey.血管加压素在不同休克状态下的应用:一项经国际重症监护医学学会认可的国际调查——PRESS 调查的国际见解
Crit Care. 2025 Jul 3;29(1):273. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05505-5.
6
Analysis of the heterogeneous treatment effect of vasoactive drug dosage and time on hospital mortality across different sepsis phenotypes: a retrospective cohort study.血管活性药物剂量和时间对不同脓毒症表型患者医院死亡率的异质性治疗效果分析:一项回顾性队列研究
Eur J Med Res. 2025 May 24;30(1):410. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02660-x.
7
Novel therapies and interventions in sepsis and septic shock.脓毒症和脓毒性休克的新型治疗方法与干预措施。
BJA Educ. 2025 May;25(5):206-217. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2025.01.003. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
8
Effect of Arginine Vasopressin on Human Neutrophil Function Under Physiological and Sepsis-Associated Conditions.精氨酸加压素在生理及脓毒症相关条件下对人中性粒细胞功能的影响
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Mar 11;26(6):2512. doi: 10.3390/ijms26062512.
9
Vasopressor Therapy.血管加压药治疗
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 3;13(23):7372. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237372.
10
An optimal antibiotic selection framework for Sepsis patients using Artificial Intelligence.一种使用人工智能的脓毒症患者最佳抗生素选择框架。
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Nov 29;7(1):343. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01350-y.
Crit Care. 2022 Mar 22;26(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-03911-7.
4
Influence of Timing and Catecholamine Requirements on Vasopressin Responsiveness in Critically ill Patients with Septic Shock.危重症脓毒性休克患者血管加压素反应性的时机和儿茶酚胺需求的影响。
J Intensive Care Med. 2022 Nov;37(11):1512-1519. doi: 10.1177/08850666221081836. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
5
Association of Arterial pH With Hemodynamic Response to Vasopressin in Patients With Septic Shock: An Observational Cohort Study.脓毒性休克患者动脉pH值与血管加压素血流动力学反应的关联:一项观察性队列研究
Crit Care Explor. 2022 Feb 8;4(2):e0634. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000634. eCollection 2022 Feb.
6
Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021.拯救脓毒症运动:2021年脓毒症和脓毒性休克国际管理指南
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Nov;47(11):1181-1247. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
7
Association of Catecholamine Dose, Lactate, and Shock Duration at Vasopressin Initiation With Mortality in Patients With Septic Shock.脓毒性休克患者开始使用血管加压素时儿茶酚胺剂量、乳酸水平和休克持续时间与死亡率的关联
Crit Care Med. 2022 Apr 1;50(4):614-623. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005317.
8
Vasopressin Loading for Refractory Septic Shock: A Preliminary Analysis of a Case Series.用于难治性感染性休克的血管加压素负荷剂量:病例系列的初步分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 May 4;8:644195. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.644195. eCollection 2021.
9
The effect of early vasopressin use on patients with septic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis.早期使用血管加压素对感染性休克患者的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Oct;48:203-208. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.05.007. Epub 2021 May 6.
10
Clinical Efficiency of Vasopressin or Its Analogs in Comparison With Catecholamines Alone on Patients With Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.血管加压素或其类似物与单独使用儿茶酚胺相比对感染性休克患者的临床疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Pharmacol. 2020 May 6;11:563. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00563. eCollection 2020.