Nakamura Kensuke, Nakano Hidehiko, Naraba Hiromu, Mochizuki Masaki, Takahashi Yuji, Sonoo Tomohiro, Hashimoto Hideki, Abe Toshikazu, Hayakawa Mineji, Yamakawa Kazuma
Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Hitachi General Hospital, Ibaraki, Japan.
TXP Medical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 May 4;8:644195. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.644195. eCollection 2021.
Vasopressin is one of the strong vasopressor agents associated with ischemic events. Responses to the administration of vasopressin differ among patients with septic shock. Although the administration of a high dose of vasopressin needs to be avoided, the effects of bolus loading have not yet been examined. Since the half-life of vasopressin is longer than that of catecholamines, we hypothesized that vasopressin loading may be effective for predicting responses to its continuous administration. We retrospectively analyzed consecutive cases of septic shock for which vasopressin was introduced with loading under noradrenaline at >0.2 μg/kg/min during the study period. Vasopressin was administered in a 1 U bolus followed by its continuous administration at 1 U/h. The proportion of patients with a negative catecholamine index (CAI) change 6 h after the introduction of vasopressin was set as the primary outcome. We defined non-responders for exploration as those with a mean arterial pressure change <18 mmHg 1 min after vasopressin loading, among whom none had a change in CAI <0. Twenty-one consecutive cases were examined in the present study, and included 14 responders and 7 non-responders. The primary outcome accounted for 71.4% of responders and 0% of non-responders, with a significant difference ( = 0.0039). Median CAI changes 2, 4, and 6 h after the administration of vasopressin were 0, -5, and -10 in responders and +20, +10, and +10 in non-responders, respectively. CAI was not reduced in any non-responder. Outcomes including mortality were not significantly different between responders and non-responders. Digital ischemia (1/21) and mesenteric ischemia (1/21) were observed. Vasopressin loading may predict responses to its continuous administration in septic shock patients. Further investigations involving a safety analysis are needed.
血管加压素是与缺血事件相关的强效血管加压剂之一。感染性休克患者对血管加压素给药的反应各不相同。虽然需要避免高剂量血管加压素给药,但推注负荷的效果尚未得到研究。由于血管加压素的半衰期比儿茶酚胺长,我们推测血管加压素负荷可能对预测其持续给药的反应有效。我们回顾性分析了研究期间在去甲肾上腺素剂量>0.2μg/kg/min的情况下引入血管加压素负荷的连续性感染性休克病例。血管加压素以1U推注给药,随后以1U/h持续给药。血管加压素引入后6小时儿茶酚胺指数(CAI)变化为阴性的患者比例被设定为主要结局。我们将血管加压素负荷后1分钟平均动脉压变化<18mmHg的患者定义为探索性无反应者,其中没有CAI变化<0的患者。本研究共检查了21例连续性病例,包括14例反应者和7例无反应者。主要结局在反应者中占71.4%,在无反应者中占0%,差异有统计学意义(P = 0.0039)。血管加压素给药后2、4和6小时反应者的CAI变化中位数分别为0、-5和-10,无反应者分别为+20、+10和+10。无反应者的CAI均未降低。反应者和无反应者在包括死亡率在内的结局方面无显著差异。观察到数字缺血(1/21)和肠系膜缺血(1/21)。血管加压素负荷可能预测感染性休克患者对其持续给药的反应。需要进一步进行涉及安全性分析的研究。