Nasim H, Lone M A, Kumar B, Ahmed N, Farooqui W A, Alsahhaf A, Alresayes S, Vohra F, Abduljabbar T
Department of Prosthodontics, Dow International Dental College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023 Mar;27(6):2222-2231. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202303_31756.
Conventional use of retraction cord in soft tissue management is effective only when the non-resilient nature of material does not jeopardize gingival health. Therefore this study aims to clinically evaluate the gingival displacement, ease of application and bleeding from polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) retraction cord.
This study is a single-center, parallel-group, randomized controlled clinical trial (1:1). Sixty patients indicated for full coverage metal-ceramic restoration for first molars were enrolled and randomly allocated to experimental (PTFE Cord) and control (conventional plain retraction cord) groups. After crown preparation and isolation, a pre-displacement impression was made. Assigned gingival displacement material was applied for 5 minutes, followed by post-displacement impression. Casts were prepared and used for assessment of mean horizontal gingival displacement by measuring displacement using a stereomicroscope (20 x). Post-displacement gingival bleeding and ease of application were also assessed clinically. t-test and Chi-square tests were used for statistical assessment of gingival displacement, gingival bleeding and ease of application.
Gingival displacement, bleeding and ease of application were similar among study groups (p > 0.05). Mean gingival displacement in the experimental group was 197.1 µm, and 167.7 µm in the control group. Bleeding was observed in 30% and 20% of cases of experimental and control group, respectively. Ease of application was 'difficult' in 53.3% and 43.3% of cases of experimental and control group, respectively. Non-impregnated gingival retraction cord and PTFE cord displayed similar outcomes of gingival displacement, ease of placement and bleeding after cord removal.
Post-displacement bleeding and discomfort for PTFE cord placement suggest that this technique needs improvement. Therefore further studies are warranted to improve and investigate the physical and biological response to PTFE retraction cord.
在软组织处理中,传统使用的缩龈线只有在材料的非弹性性质不损害牙龈健康时才有效。因此,本研究旨在临床评估聚四氟乙烯(PTFE)缩龈线的牙龈移位情况、应用便利性及出血情况。
本研究为单中心、平行组、随机对照临床试验(1:1)。纳入60例因第一磨牙需进行全冠金属烤瓷修复的患者,并随机分为试验组(PTFE线)和对照组(传统普通缩龈线)。牙冠预备及隔离后,制取移位前印模。应用指定的牙龈移位材料5分钟,随后制取移位后印模。制作模型,使用体视显微镜(20倍)测量移位情况,以评估平均水平牙龈移位。还对移位后牙龈出血情况及应用便利性进行临床评估。采用t检验和卡方检验对牙龈移位、牙龈出血及应用便利性进行统计学评估。
研究组间牙龈移位、出血及应用便利性相似(p>0.05)。试验组平均牙龈移位为197.1µm,对照组为167.7µm。试验组和对照组分别有30%和20%的病例出现出血。试验组和对照组分别有53.3%和43.3%的病例应用便利性为“困难”。未浸渍的牙龈退缩线和PTFE线在牙龈移位、放置便利性及去除线后的出血情况方面显示出相似的结果。
PTFE线移位后出血及放置时的不适感表明该技术需要改进。因此,有必要进一步开展研究以改进并研究对PTFE缩龈线的物理和生物学反应。