Suppr超能文献

额部纤维性脱发与个人护理用品使用:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Frontal fibrosing alopecia and personal care product use: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Stony Brook University Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, USA.

Department of Dermatology, Stony Brook University Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, USA.

出版信息

Arch Dermatol Res. 2023 Oct;315(8):2313-2331. doi: 10.1007/s00403-023-02604-7. Epub 2023 Apr 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) is a cicatricial alopecia affecting the frontotemporal hairline. Given that this scarring, immune-mediated follicular destruction most commonly affects postmenopausal Caucasian women, researchers have postulated that there are hormonal and genetic components; however, the etiology of FFA is still unknown. Recently, dermatologists have reported cases of FFA as being potentially caused by cosmetic products, such as sunscreen and shampoo. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis intend to be the first to analyze the relationship between FFA and cosmetic/personal care products and treatments, including sunscreen, moisturizer, foundation, shampoo, conditioner, hair mousse, hair gel, hair dye, hair straightening/rebonding, chemical/laser facial resurfacing, aftershave, and facial cleanser.

METHODS

The Cochrane, PubMed, EMBASE, and Medline (Ovid) databases were searched for the relevant studies from the date of inception to August 2022. Case-control, cross-sectional, and cohort studies examining the effects of cosmetic/personal care product use on FFA, available in English full-text, were included. Analyses were performed using Review Manager, version 5.4. Results were reported as an odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI); p values < 0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

Nine studies were included in our quantitative analyses, totaling 1,248 FFA patients and 1,459 controls. There were significant positive associations found for FFA and sunscreen (OR 3.02, 95% CI 1.67-5.47; p = 0.0003) and facial moisturizer (OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.51-3.20; p < 0.0001) use. Gender sub-analyses demonstrated a positive association for FFA and facial moisturizer in men (OR 5.07, 95% CI 1.40-18.32; p = 0.01), but not in women (OR 1.58, 95% CI 0.83-2.98; p = 0.16). Both gender sub-analyses were significantly positive for the association with facial sunscreen (Male OR 4.61, 95% CI 1.54-13.78, p = 0.006; Female OR 2.74, 95% CI 1.32-5.70, p = 0.007). There was no association found for a facial cleanser (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.33-1.52; p = 0.51), foundation (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.83-1.55; p = 0.21), shampoo (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.22-1.10; p = 0.08), hair conditioner (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.52-1.26; p = 0.35), hair mousse (OR 1.37, 95% CI 0.75-2.51; p = 0.31), and hair gel (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.48-1.69; p = 0.74), hair dye (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.69-1.64; p = 0.77), hair straightening/rebonding (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.08-9.32; p = 0.92), hair perming (OR 1.41, 95% CI 0.89-2.23; p = 0.14), facial toner (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.12-2.21; p = 0.37), or aftershave (OR 1.64, 95% CI 0.28-9.49; p = 0.58).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis strongly suggests that leave-on facial products, facial sunscreen and moisturizer, are associated with FFA. While the association with facial moisturizer did not persist when stratifying for female populations, gender sub-analyses remained significant for a facial sunscreen. There was no significant relationship found with hair products or treatments. These findings suggest a potential environmental etiology in the development of FFA, particularly UV-protecting chemicals.

摘要

背景

额部纤维性脱发(FFA)是一种影响额颞部发际线的瘢痕性脱发。鉴于这种瘢痕性、免疫介导的毛囊破坏最常发生在绝经后白种女性中,研究人员推测存在激素和遗传因素;然而,FFA 的病因仍不清楚。最近,皮肤科医生报告了一些 FFA 病例,可能是由化妆品,如防晒霜和洗发水引起的。因此,本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在首次分析 FFA 与化妆品/个人护理产品和治疗之间的关系,包括防晒霜、保湿霜、粉底、洗发水、护发素、发摩丝、发胶、染发剂、直发/拉直、化学/激光面部换肤、须后水和洗面奶。

方法

从成立日期到 2022 年 8 月,检索 Cochrane、PubMed、EMBASE 和 Medline(Ovid)数据库中关于化妆品/个人护理产品使用对 FFA 影响的相关研究。纳入了可提供英文全文的、关于使用化妆品/个人护理产品对 FFA 影响的病例对照、横断面和队列研究。使用 Review Manager 进行分析。结果以优势比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI)表示;p 值<0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

9 项研究纳入了我们的定量分析,共有 1248 例 FFA 患者和 1459 例对照。结果显示,FFA 与防晒霜(OR 3.02,95%CI 1.67-5.47;p=0.0003)和面部保湿霜(OR 2.20,95%CI 1.51-3.20;p<0.0001)的使用存在显著正相关。性别亚组分析表明,男性面部保湿霜与 FFA 之间存在正相关(OR 5.07,95%CI 1.40-18.32;p=0.01),但女性之间无显著相关性(OR 1.58,95%CI 0.83-2.98;p=0.16)。两个性别亚组分析均显示与面部防晒霜显著正相关(男性 OR 4.61,95%CI 1.54-13.78,p=0.006;女性 OR 2.74,95%CI 1.32-5.70,p=0.007)。洗面奶(OR 1.14,95%CI 0.33-1.52;p=0.51)、粉底(OR 1.13,95%CI 0.83-1.55;p=0.21)、洗发水(OR 0.49,95%CI 0.22-1.10;p=0.08)、护发素(OR 0.81,95%CI 0.52-1.26;p=0.35)、摩丝(OR 1.37,95%CI 0.75-2.51;p=0.31)、发胶(OR 0.90,95%CI 0.48-1.69;p=0.74)、染发剂(OR 1.07,95%CI 0.69-1.64;p=0.77)、拉直/拉直(OR 0.88,95%CI 0.08-9.32;p=0.92)、烫发(OR 1.41,95%CI 0.89-2.23;p=0.14)、面部爽肤水(OR 0.51,95%CI 0.12-2.21;p=0.37)或须后水(OR 1.64,95%CI 0.28-9.49;p=0.58)与 FFA 之间无显著相关性。

结论

本荟萃分析强烈表明,留用型面部产品、面部防晒霜和保湿霜与 FFA 有关。虽然女性人群中面部保湿霜的相关性在分层分析中不再显著,但面部防晒霜的性别亚组分析仍有统计学意义。与头发产品或治疗无显著关系。这些发现提示 FFA 的发展可能存在潜在的环境病因,特别是紫外线保护化学物质。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验