Suppr超能文献

VA 社区生活中心在公开报告绩效后进行质量改进工作。

Quality Improvement Efforts in VA Community Living Centers Following Public Reporting of Performance.

机构信息

Center for Access and Delivery Research & Evaluation, Iowa City Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Care System, Iowa City, IA, USA.

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA.

出版信息

J Aging Soc Policy. 2024 Jan 2;36(1):118-140. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2023.2196913. Epub 2023 Apr 4.

Abstract

For two decades, the U.S. government has publicly reported performance measures for most nursing homes, spurring some improvements in quality. Public reporting is new, however, to Department of Veterans Affairs nursing homes (Community Living Centers [CLCs]). As part of a large, public integrated healthcare system, CLCs operate with unique financial and market incentives. Thus, their responses to public reporting may differ from private sector nursing homes. In three CLCs with varied public ratings, we used an exploratory, qualitative case study approach involving semi-structured interviews to compare how CLC leaders ( = 12) perceived public reporting and its influence on quality improvement. Across CLCs, respondents said public reporting was helpful for transparency and to provide an "outside perspective" on CLC performance. Respondents described employing similar strategies to improve their public ratings: using data, engaging staff, and clearly defining staff roles vis-à-vis quality improvement, although more effort was required to implement change in lower performing CLCs. Our findings augment those from prior studies and offer new insights into the potential for public reporting to spur quality improvement in public nursing homes and those that are part of integrated healthcare systems.

摘要

二十年来,美国政府一直公开报告大多数养老院的绩效指标,这促使养老院的服务质量有所提高。然而,退伍军人事务部养老院(社区生活中心)是公共报告的新领域。作为大型公共综合医疗保健系统的一部分,社区生活中心的运营具有独特的财务和市场激励机制。因此,它们对公共报告的反应可能与私营部门的养老院不同。在三个公共评级不同的社区生活中心,我们采用了探索性的定性案例研究方法,包括半结构化访谈,比较了社区生活中心的领导者(共 12 人)如何看待公共报告及其对质量改进的影响。在所有社区生活中心,受访者表示,公共报告有助于提高透明度,并为社区生活中心的表现提供“外部视角”。受访者描述了采用类似的策略来提高他们的公共评级:使用数据、让员工参与、明确界定员工在质量改进方面的角色,尽管在表现较差的社区生活中心实施变革需要付出更多的努力。我们的研究结果补充了之前的研究,并为公共报告在促进公共养老院和那些作为综合医疗保健系统一部分的养老院的质量改进方面提供了新的见解。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验