• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

轻度认知障碍患者纵向认知结局的基线预测因素。

Baseline Predictors of Longitudinal Cognitive Outcomes in Persons with Mild Cognitive Impairment.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences & Technology (SCTIMST), Thiruvananthapuram, India.

Achutha Menon Centre for Health Science Studies, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences & Technology (SCTIMST), Thiruvananthapuram, India.

出版信息

Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2023;52(2):91-107. doi: 10.1159/000529255. Epub 2023 Apr 4.

DOI:10.1159/000529255
PMID:37015199
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The study aimed to explore longitudinal cognitive outcomes and to ascertain predictors of conversion to dementia in a hospital-based mild cognitive impairment (MCI) cohort classified according to the neuropsychological phenotype at baseline.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subjects aged >55 years who had a clinical diagnosis of MCI at initial visit between 2010 and 2018, with at least one formal neuropsychological assessment at baseline and follow-up of a minimum of 2 years were included. The prospective study was completed based on evaluation at last follow-up to gauge conversion to dementia, quantification of performance on activities of daily living and when available, longitudinal neuropsychological test scores.

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients with MCI met the inclusion criteria with a mean age of 68.4 ± 6.4 years at baseline and a mean duration of follow-up for 6.4 ± 3.2 years. The cumulative conversion rate to dementia was 22.2% (21/95) and the annualized conversion rate was 3.3% per year of follow-up. The majority of subjects who had converted had multidomain MCI (66%). Only white matter changes on MRI brain revealed correlation with baseline neuropsychology tests. The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed the utility of lower baseline list recognition (adjusted odds ratio: 0.735 [95% confidence interval: 0.589-0.916]; p 0.006), lower immediate logical memory (0.885 [0.790-0.990]; p 0.03), and high perseverative error scores on set shifting (3.116 [1.425-6.817]; p 0.004) as predictors of conversion. A model score of +2.615 could predict conversion with sensitivity of 72% and specificity of 98% over 6.4 years follow-up.

CONCLUSION

There was a higher risk of conversion associated with multidomain MCI. Logistic regression-based estimations of dementia risk utilizing domain-based neuropsychology test scores in MCI have high specificity for diagnosis at baseline.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在探索纵向认知结果,并确定根据基线时的神经心理学表型分类的基于医院的轻度认知障碍(MCI)队列中向痴呆转化的预测因素。

材料与方法

纳入 2010 年至 2018 年间初次就诊时临床诊断为 MCI、基线和随访至少 2 年至少有一次正式神经心理学评估的年龄>55 岁的受试者。根据最后一次随访时的评估完成前瞻性研究,以评估向痴呆的转化、日常生活活动能力的评估以及在可能的情况下纵向神经心理学测试评分。

结果

95 名 MCI 患者符合纳入标准,基线时平均年龄为 68.4±6.4 岁,平均随访时间为 6.4±3.2 年。向痴呆的累积转化率为 22.2%(21/95),每年的转化率为 3.3%。大多数转化的患者为多域 MCI(66%)。只有 MRI 脑的白质变化与基线神经心理学测试相关。多变量逻辑回归分析显示基线认知测试的低列表识别(调整后的优势比:0.735[95%置信区间:0.589-0.916];p 0.006)、低即时逻辑记忆(0.885[0.790-0.990];p 0.03)和高持续错误分数的转变(3.116[1.425-6.817];p 0.004)是转化的预测因素。模型分数为+2.615 可以在 6.4 年的随访中预测转化率,其敏感性为 72%,特异性为 98%。

结论

多域 MCI 与更高的转化风险相关。基于逻辑回归的基于 MCI 中基于域的神经心理学测试评分的痴呆风险估计在基线时具有高特异性的诊断。

相似文献

1
Baseline Predictors of Longitudinal Cognitive Outcomes in Persons with Mild Cognitive Impairment.轻度认知障碍患者纵向认知结局的基线预测因素。
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2023;52(2):91-107. doi: 10.1159/000529255. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
2
Annual rate and predictors of conversion to dementia in subjects presenting mild cognitive impairment criteria defined according to a population-based study.根据一项基于人群的研究定义的轻度认知障碍标准,呈现该标准的受试者向痴呆症转化的年发生率及预测因素。
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2004;18(1):87-93. doi: 10.1159/000077815. Epub 2004 Apr 14.
3
Natural course of mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson disease: A 5-year population-based study.帕金森病轻度认知障碍的自然病程:一项基于人群的5年研究。
Neurology. 2017 Feb 21;88(8):767-774. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003634. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
4
Cognitive-Driven Activities of Daily Living Impairment as a Predictor for Dementia in Parkinson Disease: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.认知驱动的日常生活活动障碍作为帕金森病痴呆的预测因素:一项纵向队列研究。
Neurology. 2022 Dec 5;99(23):e2548-e2560. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000201201.
5
Daily Function as Predictor of Dementia in Cognitive Impairment, No Dementia (CIND) and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI): An 8-Year Follow-Up in the ILSA Study.日常功能作为认知障碍无痴呆(CIND)和轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者痴呆症的预测指标:ILSA研究的8年随访
J Alzheimers Dis. 2016 May 7;53(2):505-15. doi: 10.3233/JAD-160087.
6
Neuropsychological predictors of cognitive deterioration in non-demented individuals.非痴呆个体认知功能衰退的神经心理学预测指标
Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2020 Mar;25(2):99-112. doi: 10.1080/13546805.2019.1700105. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
7
Predictors of Cognitive Change in Parkinson Disease: A 2-year Follow-up Study.帕金森病认知变化的预测因素:一项为期 2 年的随访研究。
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2023;37(4):335-342. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000576. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
8
Measurement of Functional Cognition and Complex Everyday Activities in Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment and Mild Dementia: Validity of the Large Allen's Cognitive Level Screen.轻度认知障碍和轻度痴呆老年人的功能性认知与复杂日常活动测量:大型艾伦认知水平筛查的效度
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017 May;25(5):471-482. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2016.11.021. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
9
Conversion of amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment to dementia of Alzheimer type is independent to memory deterioration.遗忘型轻度认知障碍转化为阿尔茨海默病型痴呆与记忆衰退无关。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007 Dec;22(12):1217-22. doi: 10.1002/gps.1816.
10
Prognosis of mild cognitive impairment in early Parkinson disease: the Norwegian ParkWest study.早期帕金森病患者轻度认知障碍的预后:挪威 ParkWest 研究。
JAMA Neurol. 2013 May;70(5):580-6. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.2110.

引用本文的文献

1
Construction Tasks in Diagnosis of Early Cognitive Impairment - A Critical Revisitation.早期认知障碍诊断中的构建任务——批判性再审视
Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2025 May 1;28(3):406-413. doi: 10.4103/aian.aian_1000_24. Epub 2025 May 27.
2
Predicting cognitive change using functional, structural, and neuropsychological predictors.使用功能、结构和神经心理学预测指标预测认知变化。
Brain Commun. 2025 Apr 18;7(3):fcaf155. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaf155. eCollection 2025.
3
Cognitive markers of resilience to dementia in mild Neurocognitive Impairment: a meta- analysis.
轻度神经认知障碍中对痴呆症具有复原力的认知标志物:一项荟萃分析。
Neurol Sci. 2025 Jun;46(6):2401-2418. doi: 10.1007/s10072-025-08080-3. Epub 2025 Mar 3.