Institute for Informatics, School of Medicine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, United States.
Institute for Informatics, School of Medicine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, United States; Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, United States.
J Biomed Inform. 2023 May;141:104349. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2023.104349. Epub 2023 Apr 2.
Clinical work involves performing overlapping, time-sensitive tasks that frequently require clinicians to switch their attention between multiple tasks. We developed a methodological approach using EHR-based audit logs to determine switch costs-the cognitive burden associated with task switching-and assessed its magnitude during routine EHR-based clinical tasks.
Physician trainees (N = 75) participated in a longitudinal study where they provided access to their EHR-based audit logs. Physicians' audit log actions were used to create a taxonomy of EHR tasks. These tasks were transformed into task sequences and the time spent on each task in a sequence was computed. Within these task sequences, instances of task switching (i.e., switching from one task to the next) and non-switching were identified. The primary outcome of interest was the time spent on a post-switch task. Using a mixed-effects regression model, we compared the durations of post-switch and non-switch tasks.
2,781,679 audit log events over 117,822 sessions from 75 physicians were analyzed. Physicians spent most time on chart review (Median (IQR) = 5,439 (2,492-8,336) seconds), note review (1,936 (827-3,321) seconds), and navigating the EHR interface (1,048 (365.5-2,006) seconds) daily. Post task switch activity times were greater for documentation (Median increase = 5 s), order entry (Median increase = 3 s) and results review (Median increase = 3 s). Mixed-effects regression showed that time spent on tasks were longer following a task switch (β = 0.03; 95% CI = 0.027, CI = 0.034), with greater post-swtich task times for imaging, order entry, note review, handoff, note entry, chart review and best practice advisory tasks.
Increased task switching time-an indicator of the cognitive burden associated with switching between tasks-is prevalent in routine EHR-based tasks. We discuss the cumulative impact of incremental switch costs have on overall EHR workload, wellness, and error rates. Relying on theoretical cognitive foundations, we suggest pragmatic design considerations for mitigating the effects of cognitive burden associated with task switching.
临床工作涉及执行重叠且时间敏感的任务,这些任务经常需要临床医生在多个任务之间切换注意力。我们开发了一种使用基于电子健康记录 (EHR) 的审核日志来确定切换成本(与任务切换相关的认知负担)的方法,并评估其在常规基于 EHR 的临床任务中的大小。
医师受训者(N=75)参与了一项纵向研究,他们提供了对其基于 EHR 的审核日志的访问权限。医师的审核日志操作被用于创建 EHR 任务分类法。这些任务被转换为任务序列,并计算序列中每个任务所花费的时间。在这些任务序列中,确定了任务切换(即从一个任务切换到另一个任务)和非切换的实例。主要关注的结果是切换后任务所花费的时间。使用混合效应回归模型,我们比较了切换后和非切换任务的持续时间。
分析了 75 名医师的 117822 个会话中的 2781679 个审核日志事件。医师每天在查看图表(中位数(IQR)= 5439(2492-8336)秒)、查看记录(1936(827-3321)秒)和导航 EHR 界面(1048(365.5-2006)秒)上花费的时间最多。在文档记录(中位数增加= 5 秒)、医嘱输入(中位数增加= 3 秒)和结果查看(中位数增加= 3 秒)等方面,任务切换后的活动时间更长。混合效应回归显示,任务切换后花费的时间更长(β= 0.03;95%CI= 0.027,CI= 0.034),切换后任务时间更长的还有影像学、医嘱输入、记录查看、交接班、记录输入、图表查看和最佳实践建议任务。
在常规基于 EHR 的任务中,任务切换时间的增加(即与任务切换相关的认知负担的指标)很常见。我们讨论了增量切换成本对整体 EHR 工作量、健康和错误率的累积影响。基于理论认知基础,我们为减轻与任务切换相关的认知负担的影响提供了实用的设计考虑。