Pires de Camargo Z, Unterkircher C, Drouhet E
J Med Vet Mycol. 1986 Feb;24(1):77-9. doi: 10.1080/02681218680000091.
MELISA and CF were compared using sera from paracoccidioidomycosis patients before treatment and patients undergoing antimycotic treatment. With MELISA it was possible to distinguish different antibody levels in both groups of patients whereas such distinction was not observed by using CF tests. MELISA is thus an advantageous alternative to CF in the diagnosis of paracoccidioidomycosis, including the possibility of testing sera with anticomplementary activity.
采用来自副球孢子菌病患者治疗前的血清以及接受抗真菌治疗的患者的血清,对梅里埃酶联免疫吸附测定法(MELISA)和补体结合试验(CF)进行了比较。通过MELISA能够区分两组患者不同的抗体水平,而使用CF试验未观察到这种差异。因此,在副球孢子菌病的诊断中,MELISA是CF的一种有利替代方法,包括能够检测具有抗补体活性的血清。