Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Department of Pathology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Br J Cancer. 2023 Jun;128(11):2116-2125. doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02241-x. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
Micropapillary (MIP) component was a major concern in determining surgical strategy in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). We sought to develop a novel method for detecting MIP component during surgery.
Differentially expressed proteins between MIP-positive and MIP-negative LUAD were identified through proteomics analysis. The semi-dry dot-blot (SDB) method which visualises the targeted protein was developed to detect MIP component.
Cellular retinoic acid-binding protein 2 (CRABP2) was significantly upregulated in MIP-positive LUAD (P < 0.001), and the high CRABP2 expression zone showed spatial consistency with MIP component. CRABP2 expression was also associated with decreased recurrence-free survival (P < 0.001). In the prospective cohort, the accuracy and sensitivity of detecting MIP component using SDB method by visualising CRABP2 were 82.2% and 72.7%, which were comparable to these of pathologist. Pathologist with the aid of SDB method would improve greatly in diagnostic accuracy (86.4%) and sensitivity (78.2%). In patients with minor MIP component (≤5%), the sensitivity of SDB method (63.6%) was significantly higher than pathologist (45.4%).
Intraoperative examination of CRABP2 using SDB method to detect MIP component reached comparable performance to pathologist, and SDB method had notable superiority than pathologist in detecting minor MIP component.
微乳头(MIP)成分是决定肺腺癌(LUAD)手术策略的主要关注点。我们试图开发一种在手术中检测 MIP 成分的新方法。
通过蛋白质组学分析鉴定 MIP 阳性和 MIP 阴性 LUAD 之间差异表达的蛋白质。开发了半干斑点印迹(SDB)方法来检测 MIP 成分,该方法可可视化靶向蛋白。
细胞视黄醇结合蛋白 2(CRABP2)在 MIP 阳性 LUAD 中显著上调(P<0.001),并且高 CRABP2 表达区与 MIP 成分具有空间一致性。CRABP2 表达也与无复发生存率降低相关(P<0.001)。在前瞻性队列中,SDB 方法通过可视化 CRABP2 检测 MIP 成分的准确性和敏感性分别为 82.2%和 72.7%,与病理学家相当。病理学家借助 SDB 方法可显著提高诊断准确性(86.4%)和敏感性(78.2%)。在 MIP 成分较小(≤5%)的患者中,SDB 方法的敏感性(63.6%)明显高于病理学家(45.4%)。
使用 SDB 方法检测 CRABP2 来检测 MIP 成分的术中检查与病理学家相当,并且 SDB 方法在检测较小的 MIP 成分方面明显优于病理学家。