• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于血液的生物标志物panel 用于个体化肺癌风险评估。

Blood-Based Biomarker Panel for Personalized Lung Cancer Risk Assessment.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.

Biostatistics Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 10;40(8):876-883. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01460. Epub 2022 Jan 7.

DOI:10.1200/JCO.21.01460
PMID:34995129
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8906454/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate whether a panel of circulating protein biomarkers would improve risk assessment for lung cancer screening in combination with a risk model on the basis of participant characteristics.

METHODS

A blinded validation study was performed using prostate lung colorectal ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial data and biospecimens to evaluate the performance of a four-marker protein panel (4MP) consisting of the precursor form of surfactant protein B, cancer antigen 125, carcinoembryonic antigen, and cytokeratin-19 fragment in combination with a lung cancer risk prediction model (PLCO) compared with current US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) screening criteria. The 4MP was assayed in 1,299 sera collected preceding lung cancer diagnosis and 8,709 noncase sera.

RESULTS

The 4MP alone yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.77 to 0.82) for case sera collected within 1-year preceding diagnosis and 0.74 (95% CI, 0.72 to 0.76) among the entire specimen set. The combined 4MP + PLCO model yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.82 to 0.88) for case sera collected within 1 year preceding diagnosis. The benefit of the 4MP in the combined model resulted from improvement in sensitivity at high specificity. Compared with the USPSTF2021 criteria, the combined 4MP + PLCO model exhibited statistically significant improvements in sensitivity and specificity. Among PLCO participants with ≥ 10 smoking pack-years, the 4MP + PLCO model would have identified for annual screening 9.2% more lung cancer cases and would have reduced referral by 13.7% among noncases compared with USPSTF2021 criteria.

CONCLUSION

A blood-based biomarker panel in combination with PLCO significantly improves lung cancer risk assessment for lung cancer screening.

摘要

目的

研究一组循环蛋白生物标志物是否可以与基于参与者特征的风险模型相结合,改善肺癌筛查的风险评估。

方法

采用前列腺肺结直肠卵巢(PLCO)癌症筛查试验的数据和生物标本进行了一项盲法验证研究,以评估由表面活性剂蛋白 B 前体、癌抗原 125、癌胚抗原和细胞角蛋白 19 片段组成的四标志物蛋白组(4MP)与目前美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)筛查标准相比,在结合肺癌风险预测模型(PLCO)时的性能。该 4MP 在 1299 份在肺癌诊断前收集的血清和 8709 份非病例血清中进行了检测。

结果

4MP 单独用于在诊断前 1 年内收集的病例血清时,其受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.79(95%CI,0.77 至 0.82),而在整个标本集中为 0.74(95%CI,0.72 至 0.76)。4MP+PLCO 联合模型在诊断前 1 年内收集的病例血清中,受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.85(95%CI,0.82 至 0.88)。联合模型中 4MP 的优势在于提高了高特异性下的灵敏度。与 USPSTF2021 标准相比,联合 4MP+PLCO 模型在灵敏度和特异性方面均有显著提高。在 PLCO 参与者中,≥10 包年吸烟量者中,与 USPSTF2021 标准相比,4MP+PLCO 模型每年可识别 9.2%更多的肺癌病例,而非病例的转诊率可降低 13.7%。

结论

血液生物标志物组与 PLCO 相结合可显著提高肺癌筛查的肺癌风险评估。

相似文献

1
Blood-Based Biomarker Panel for Personalized Lung Cancer Risk Assessment.基于血液的生物标志物panel 用于个体化肺癌风险评估。
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 10;40(8):876-883. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01460. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
2
Mortality Benefit of a Blood-Based Biomarker Panel for Lung Cancer on the Basis of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cohort.基于前列腺癌、肺癌、结直肠癌和卵巢癌队列的血液生物标志物面板对肺癌的生存获益。
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Sep 20;41(27):4360-4368. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.02424. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
3
Sensitivity of US Preventive Services Task Force and PLCOm2012 lung cancer screening eligibility criteria in individuals with lung cancer in South Dakota self-reporting as Indigenous and non-Indigenous.南达科他州肺癌患者自我报告为原住民和非原住民的情况下,美国预防服务工作组和 PLCOm2012 肺癌筛查资格标准的敏感性。
Cancer. 2023 Dec 15;129(24):3894-3904. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34947. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
4
Assessment of Lung Cancer Risk on the Basis of a Biomarker Panel of Circulating Proteins.基于循环蛋白生物标志物面板评估肺癌风险。
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;4(10):e182078. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2078. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
5
OWL: an optimized and independently validated machine learning prediction model for lung cancer screening based on the UK Biobank, PLCO, and NLST populations.OWL:一种基于英国生物银行、PLCO 和 NLST 人群的肺癌筛查的优化和独立验证的机器学习预测模型。
EBioMedicine. 2023 Feb;88:104443. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104443. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
6
Risk prediction models for selection of lung cancer screening candidates: A retrospective validation study.用于选择肺癌筛查候选者的风险预测模型:一项回顾性验证研究。
PLoS Med. 2017 Apr 4;14(4):e1002277. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002277. eCollection 2017 Apr.
7
USPSTF2013 versus PLCOm2012 lung cancer screening eligibility criteria (International Lung Screening Trial): interim analysis of a prospective cohort study.USPSTF2013 与 PLCOm2012 肺癌筛查资格标准(国际肺癌筛查试验):前瞻性队列研究的中期分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2022 Jan;23(1):138-148. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00590-8. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
8
Identifying high risk individuals for targeted lung cancer screening: Independent validation of the PLCO risk prediction tool.确定高危人群进行有针对性的肺癌筛查:PLCO 风险预测工具的独立验证。
Int J Cancer. 2017 Jul 15;141(2):242-253. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30673. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
9
Addressing Sex Disparities in Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility: USPSTF vs PLCOm2012 Criteria.解决肺癌筛查资格方面的性别差异:美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)与PLCOm2012标准对比
Chest. 2022 Jan;161(1):248-256. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.06.066. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
10
Deep Learning Using Chest Radiographs to Identify High-Risk Smokers for Lung Cancer Screening Computed Tomography: Development and Validation of a Prediction Model.利用胸部X光片进行深度学习以识别肺癌筛查计算机断层扫描的高危吸烟者:预测模型的开发与验证
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Nov 3;173(9):704-713. doi: 10.7326/M20-1868. Epub 2020 Sep 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Biomarkers for the diagnosis of indeterminate pulmonary nodules: are we there yet?用于诊断不明确肺结节的生物标志物:我们做到了吗?
J Thorac Dis. 2025 Aug 31;17(8):6265-6282. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2024-2010. Epub 2025 Jul 23.
2
Plasma exosomal tsRNA may be used as a marker for differential diagnosis of benign and malignant pulmonary nodules.血浆外泌体tsRNA可作为鉴别诊断良性和恶性肺结节的标志物。
J Transl Med. 2025 Jul 1;23(1):712. doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-06737-3.
3
T cell receptor profiling of blood to detect lung cancer.通过血液进行T细胞受体分析以检测肺癌。
Cancer Immunol Res. 2025 Jul 1. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-24-1109.
4
Time to Benefit for Lung Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Survival Meta-Analysis.肺癌筛查的获益时间:一项系统评价与生存Meta分析
Am J Prev Med. 2025 Aug;69(2):107736. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2025.107736. Epub 2025 May 28.
5
A novel composite model for distinguishing benign and malignant pulmonary nodules.一种用于区分肺良性和恶性结节的新型复合模型。
Clin Exp Med. 2025 May 14;25(1):159. doi: 10.1007/s10238-025-01672-5.
6
Comprehensive Serum Glycopeptide Spectra Analysis Combined with Machine Learning for Early Detection of Lung Cancer: A Case-Control Study.综合血清糖肽谱分析联合机器学习用于肺癌早期检测:一项病例对照研究
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Apr 27;17(9):1474. doi: 10.3390/cancers17091474.
7
Progress in the development of cancer vaccines for lung cancer utilizing dendritic cells (Review).利用树突状细胞开发肺癌癌症疫苗的进展(综述)
Oncol Lett. 2025 Apr 14;29(6):298. doi: 10.3892/ol.2025.15044. eCollection 2025 Jun.
8
How AI is helping to boost cancer screening.人工智能如何助力提升癌症筛查水平。
Nature. 2025 Apr;640(8060):S62-S64. doi: 10.1038/d41586-025-01153-5.
9
External Validation of Plasma Glycosaminoglycans as Biomarkers to Improve Lung Cancer Risk Stratification.血浆糖胺聚糖作为改善肺癌风险分层生物标志物的外部验证
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2025 Jul 1;34(7):1219-1225. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1537.
10
Deep learning-based identification of patients at increased risk of cancer using routine laboratory markers.利用常规实验室指标,基于深度学习识别患癌风险增加的患者。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 12;15(1):12661. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97331-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Screening for Lung Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.肺癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2021 Mar 9;325(10):962-970. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.1117.
2
Evaluation of the Benefits and Harms of Lung Cancer Screening With Low-Dose Computed Tomography: Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force.肺癌低剂量计算机断层扫描筛查的获益与危害评估:美国预防服务工作组的建模研究。
JAMA. 2021 Mar 9;325(10):988-997. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.1077.
3
Lung cancer screening eligibility and use with low-dose computed tomography: Results from the 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System cross-sectional survey.肺癌筛查资格和低剂量计算机断层扫描的使用:来自 2018 年行为风险因素监测系统横断面调查的结果。
Cancer. 2021 Mar 1;127(5):748-756. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33322. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
4
State Variation in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Scanning for Lung Cancer Screening in the United States.美国肺癌筛查中低剂量计算机断层扫描的州际差异。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Aug 2;113(8):1044-1052. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa170.
5
Contribution of a Blood-Based Protein Biomarker Panel to the Classification of Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules.基于血液的蛋白质生物标志物谱在肺部不定性结节分类中的作用。
J Thorac Oncol. 2021 Feb;16(2):228-236. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.09.024. Epub 2020 Oct 31.
6
Risk-Based lung cancer screening: A systematic review.基于风险的肺癌筛查:一项系统综述。
Lung Cancer. 2020 Sep;147:154-186. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.07.007. Epub 2020 Jul 12.
7
Recommendations for Implementing Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose Computed Tomography in Europe.欧洲低剂量计算机断层扫描肺癌筛查实施建议。
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Jun 24;12(6):0. doi: 10.3390/cancers12061672.
8
Risk prediction models versus simplified selection criteria to determine eligibility for lung cancer screening: an analysis of German federal-wide survey and incidence data.风险预测模型与简化选择标准在确定肺癌筛查资格中的比较:基于德国联邦范围调查和发病数据的分析。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2020 Oct;35(10):899-912. doi: 10.1007/s10654-020-00657-w. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
9
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Lung Cancer Screening in the United States.美国肺癌筛查的成本效益分析
Ann Intern Med. 2020 May 19;172(10):706-707. doi: 10.7326/L20-0072.
10
Protocol and Rationale for the International Lung Screening Trial.国际肺癌筛查试验的方案和原理。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020 Apr;17(4):503-512. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201902-102OC.