Department of Musculoskeletal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Department of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Cancer Med. 2023 May;12(10):11475-11482. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5866. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
BRAF V600 mutation is the most common oncogenic alternation in melanoma and is visible in around 50% of cutaneous and 10%-15% of acral or mucosal subtypes. Currently, immunotherapy with anti-PD-1 blockade and dual-targeted therapy with Dabrafenib plus trametinib (D + T) target therapy have been approved as adjuvant therapies for Stage III melanoma with BRAF V600 mutation. According to their phase III clinical trials, 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) is around 60% for both types of treatment. However, early disease control was slightly more effective with targeted therapy than immunotherapy. With different drug approval deadlines in China, anti-PD1 monotherapy, D + T combination, and Vemurafenib (V) monotherapy have all been used in real clinical practice as adjuvant settings for stage III BRAF-mut melanoma in recent years. We conducted this retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy of different treatments in the Chinese melanoma population.
Patients who underwent radical surgery and were diagnosed as Stage III melanoma harboring BRAF V600 mutation by pathological report were retrospectively identified at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center from January 2017 to December 2021. Patients with mucosal melanoma, or with follow-up of <6 months, or receiving other adjuvant treatment were excluded. Pearson's chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test was performed for univariable analysis of the different adjuvant groups. Log-rank analysis was used to identify prognostic factors for relapse-free survival (RFS).
Ninety-three patients with resected stage III melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation were identified in our study, including 25 patients receiving adjuvant anti-PD-1 immunotherapy (PD-1), 25 receiving adjuvant D + T, 23 receiving V, and 20 patients with observation-only (OBS). There were no statistical differences between treatment groups in baseline characteristics including age, gender, subtypes, primary thickness, ulceration, and nodal involvement. Median relapse-free survival (RFS) time was not reached in the D + T group, 15 months in the V group, 15 months in the PD-1 group, and 10 months in the OBS group, respectively. Compared to OBS, all three other groups showed a tendency to benefit from RFS, while only D + T achieved a statistical difference (p = 0.002). However, compared to D + T, anti-PD-1 monotherapy also showed significantly worse relapse control (p = 0.032).
For Chinese stage III melanoma with BRAF mutation, both novel targeted therapy and immunotherapy showed potential benefits in relapse-free survival compared to observation only. Dual-targeted D + T therapy may still be the best choice for adjuvant therapy because anti-PD-1 monotherapy has failed to report equivalent efficacy in real-world practice.
BRAF V600 突变是黑色素瘤中最常见的致癌改变,约 50%的皮肤黑色素瘤和 10%-15%的肢端或黏膜亚型可见。目前,抗 PD-1 单克隆抗体阻断和达布拉非尼联合曲美替尼(D+T)双重靶向治疗已被批准作为 BRAF V600 突变的 III 期黑色素瘤的辅助治疗。根据其 III 期临床试验,两种治疗方法的 3 年无复发生存率(RFS)均约为 60%。然而,靶向治疗在早期疾病控制方面比免疫治疗略有效。由于中国不同的药物批准截止日期,抗 PD1 单药、D+T 联合和维莫非尼(V)单药治疗均已在中国被用于 III 期 BRAF-mut 黑色素瘤的真实临床实践中的辅助治疗。我们进行了这项回顾性研究,以评估不同治疗方法在中国黑色素瘤人群中的疗效。
本研究在复旦大学附属肿瘤医院回顾性地分析了 2017 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间经病理报告诊断为 III 期 BRAF V600 突变的黑色素瘤患者。排除黏膜黑色素瘤患者,或随访时间<6 个月,或接受其他辅助治疗的患者。采用 Pearson 卡方检验或 Fisher 确切概率法对不同辅助治疗组进行单变量分析。采用对数秩检验分析无复发生存率(RFS)的预后因素。
本研究共纳入 93 例 III 期 BRAF V600E 突变黑色素瘤患者,其中 25 例接受辅助抗 PD-1 免疫治疗(PD-1),25 例接受辅助 D+T,23 例接受 V,20 例仅接受观察(OBS)。在年龄、性别、亚型、原发灶厚度、溃疡和淋巴结受累等基线特征方面,治疗组之间无统计学差异。D+T 组的中位无复发生存时间(RFS)未达到,V 组为 15 个月,PD-1 组为 15 个月,OBS 组为 10 个月。与 OBS 相比,其他三组均有改善 RFS 的趋势,但仅 D+T 达到统计学差异(p=0.002)。然而,与 D+T 相比,抗 PD-1 单药治疗的复发控制明显更差(p=0.032)。
对于中国 BRAF 突变的 III 期黑色素瘤,与观察相比,新型靶向治疗和免疫治疗在无复发生存率方面均显示出潜在的获益。双重靶向 D+T 治疗可能仍是辅助治疗的最佳选择,因为抗 PD-1 单药治疗在真实世界实践中未能报告等效疗效。