Zhang Qihang, Zhang Yalian, Liao Qianxi, Guo Xin
Business College, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, 410004, China.
School of Business and Creative Industries, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley, UK.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 May;30(21):60196-60211. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26699-7. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
Given the global ecological environment deteriorating, the ESG (environmental, social, and governance) concept advocates that economic growth and environmental protection must go hand in hand. Green taxations, in particular, are critical to economic development as they serve as a key lever for the government in regulating the national economy and improving environmental quality. This paper aims to examine the pollution reduction effect of green taxation in China. We constructed fixed effect model using provincial panel data from 2012 to 2017 to empirically examine the effect of green taxation-including environment protection tax, consumption tax, resource tax, and vehicle purchase tax-on pollution emissions. The findings show that environmental protection tax has a significant inhibitory effect on exhaust gas emissions but a poor inhibitory effect on wastewater and industrial solid waste emissions. Other green taxations-consumption tax, resource tax, and vehicle purchase tax-do not have an ideal inhibitory effect on pollution emissions. The paper concludes with policy recommendations organized around improving the environmental protection tax, actively promoting the ESG concept, and optimizing the top-level design of the green taxation system.
鉴于全球生态环境日益恶化,ESG(环境、社会和治理)理念倡导经济增长与环境保护必须齐头并进。特别是绿色税收,对经济发展至关重要,因为它们是政府调节国民经济和改善环境质量的关键杠杆。本文旨在研究中国绿色税收的污染减排效果。我们利用2012年至2017年的省级面板数据构建固定效应模型,以实证检验绿色税收(包括环境保护税、消费税、资源税和车辆购置税)对污染排放的影响。研究结果表明,环境保护税对废气排放有显著抑制作用,但对废水和工业固体废物排放的抑制作用较差。其他绿色税收——消费税、资源税和车辆购置税——对污染排放没有理想的抑制作用。本文最后围绕完善环境保护税、积极推广ESG理念和优化绿色税收制度顶层设计提出了政策建议。