• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Retrospective Evaluation of Fascial Plane Blocks in Cardiac Surgery With Median Sternotomy in a Tertiary Hospital.三级医院正中开胸心脏手术中筋膜平面阻滞的回顾性评估
Cureus. 2023 Mar 3;15(3):e35718. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35718. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
Analgesic Effect of Addition of Pectointercostal Block to Serratus Anterior Plane Block in Breast Surgeries: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.经皮肋间神经阻滞联合前锯肌平面阻滞在乳腺手术中的镇痛效果:一项随机对照试验。
Pain Physician. 2023 Oct;26(6):E679-E685.
3
Intraoperative Fascial Plane Blocks Facilitate Earlier Tracheal Extubation and Intensive Care Unit Discharge After Cardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.术中筋膜平面阻滞有助于心脏手术后更早拔除气管插管及转出重症监护病房:一项回顾性队列分析
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2023 Mar;37(3):437-444. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2022.11.021. Epub 2022 Nov 26.
4
Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Pecto-intercostal Fascial Block and Transversus Thoracic Muscle Plane Block for Acute Poststernotomy Pain Management After Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Pilot Study.超声引导下胸肌间沟筋膜阻滞与经胸横肌平面阻滞在心脏手术后急性胸骨后疼痛管理中的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲的初步研究。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022 Aug;36(8 Pt A):2313-2321. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2021.09.041. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
5
A randomised controlled comparison of serratus anterior plane, pectoral nerves and intercostal nerve block for post-thoracotomy analgesia in adult cardiac surgery.成人心脏手术开胸术后镇痛中,前锯肌平面阻滞、胸神经阻滞和肋间神经阻滞的随机对照比较
Indian J Anaesth. 2020 Dec;64(12):1018-1024. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_566_20. Epub 2020 Dec 12.
6
The Analgesic Efficacy of Pecto-Intercostal Fascial Block Combined with Pectoral Nerve Block in Modified Radical Mastectomy: A Prospective Randomized Trial.改良根治性乳腺癌手术中胸肌间沟筋膜平面阻滞联合肋间臂神经阻滞的镇痛效果:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Pain Physician. 2020 Sep;23(5):485-493.
7
Comparison of Transversus Thoracis Muscle Plane Block and Pecto-Intercostal Fascial Plane Block for enhanced recovery after pediatric open-heart surgery.比较经胸横肌平面阻滞和胸肌肋间筋膜平面阻滞对小儿心脏直视手术后加速康复的效果。
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2023 Aug;42(4):101230. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2023.101230. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
8
Continuous Pecto-Intercostal Fascial Block Provides Effective Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Open Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.连续胸肋筋膜阻滞在开胸心脏手术患者中的镇痛效果:一项随机对照试验。
Pain Med. 2022 Mar 2;23(3):440-447. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab291.
9
Comparison of the Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Serratus Anterior Plane Block, Pectoral Nerves II Block, and Intercostal Nerve Block for the Management of Postoperative Thoracotomy Pain After Pediatric Cardiac Surgery.超声引导下前锯肌平面阻滞、胸神经Ⅱ阻滞和肋间神经阻滞用于小儿心脏手术后开胸术后疼痛管理的疗效比较
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019 Feb;33(2):418-425. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2018.08.209. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
10
Effects of bilateral Pecto-intercostal Fascial Block for perioperative pain management in patients undergoing open cardiac surgery: a prospective randomized study.双侧胸肋筋膜阻滞对开胸心脏手术患者围手术期疼痛管理的影响:一项前瞻性随机研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Jun 22;21(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01391-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Chest Wall and Abdominal Blocks for Thoracic and Abdominal Surgeries: A Review.用于胸腹部手术的胸壁和腹部阻滞:综述
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2023 Oct;27(10):587-600. doi: 10.1007/s11916-023-01158-7. Epub 2023 Aug 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Erector spinae plane block versus its combination with superficial parasternal intercostal plane block for postoperative pain after cardiac surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.竖脊肌平面阻滞与竖脊肌平面阻滞联合肋间神经前锯肌平面阻滞用于心脏手术后的术后疼痛:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Sep 16;22(1):295. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01832-0.
2
Median sternotomy pain after cardiac surgery: To block, or not? A systematic review and meta-analysis.心脏手术后正中胸骨切开术疼痛:阻滞,还是不阻滞?一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Card Surg. 2022 Nov;37(11):3729-3742. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16882. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
3
Parasternal Intercostal Nerve Blocks in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: Evidence Update and Technical Considerations.心脏手术患者的胸骨旁肋间神经阻滞:证据更新与技术考量
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022 Nov;36(11):4173-4182. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2022.07.025. Epub 2022 Jul 24.
4
Comment on: "Pecto-intercostal Fascial Block for perioperative pain management in patients undergoing open cardiac surgery".评论:“开胸心脏手术围手术期疼痛管理中的胸肋筋膜阻滞”。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Aug 19;22(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01794-3.
5
Regional analgesia techniques for effective recovery from coronary artery bypass surgeries: a retrospective study involving the experience of a single center.区域麻醉技术在冠状动脉旁路手术后的有效恢复中的应用:一项单中心经验回顾性研究。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Jul 6;17(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s13019-022-01923-6.
6
Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Pecto-intercostal Fascial Block and Transversus Thoracic Muscle Plane Block for Acute Poststernotomy Pain Management After Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Pilot Study.超声引导下胸肌间沟筋膜阻滞与经胸横肌平面阻滞在心脏手术后急性胸骨后疼痛管理中的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲的初步研究。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022 Aug;36(8 Pt A):2313-2321. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2021.09.041. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
7
Evaluation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol Including Parasternal Intercostal Nerve Block in Cardiac Surgery Requiring Sternotomy.胸骨旁肋间神经阻滞的心脏手术加速康复外科方案评估。
Am Surg. 2021 Dec;87(10):1561-1564. doi: 10.1177/00031348211024638. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
8
Effects of bilateral Pecto-intercostal Fascial Block for perioperative pain management in patients undergoing open cardiac surgery: a prospective randomized study.双侧胸肋筋膜阻滞对开胸心脏手术患者围手术期疼痛管理的影响:一项前瞻性随机研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Jun 22;21(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01391-w.
9
Risk factors for postoperative pneumonia after cardiac surgery: a prediction model.心脏手术后发生术后肺炎的危险因素:一种预测模型。
J Thorac Dis. 2021 Apr;13(4):2351-2362. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-3586.
10
Reducing Opioid Use in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery - Preoperative, Intraoperative, and Critical Care Strategies.减少心脏手术患者的阿片类药物使用——术前、术中和重症监护策略
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021 Jul;35(7):2155-2165. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.09.103. Epub 2020 Sep 15.

三级医院正中开胸心脏手术中筋膜平面阻滞的回顾性评估

Retrospective Evaluation of Fascial Plane Blocks in Cardiac Surgery With Median Sternotomy in a Tertiary Hospital.

作者信息

Ata Filiz, Yılmaz Canan

机构信息

Anesthesiology and Reanimation, University of Bursa, Bursa Yüksek İhtisas Education and Research Hospital, Bursa, TUR.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Mar 3;15(3):e35718. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35718. eCollection 2023 Mar.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.35718
PMID:37016643
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10066868/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Cardiac surgery typically causes moderate to severe postoperative pain and discomfort. Inadequate pain management in the early postoperative period leads to pulmonary complications. The length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay and the hospital is typically prolonged. As a component of multimodal analgesia regimens, fascial plane blocks have become more popular. In our clinic, serratus anterior plane blocks (SAPB), pectoral nerve blocks (PECS I-II), and pectointercostal nerve fascial plane blocks (PIFB) are performed by ultrasonography. We wished to evaluate the postoperative visual pain scale, initial additional analgesic agent requirement time, extubation time, morbidity and mortality in patients who underwent open heart surgery with fascial plane blocks.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-eight patients over 18 years who underwent open heart surgery with sternotomy between 01 September 2021 and 15 June 2022 were evaluated retrospectively. Only patients with chest wall blocks placed at the end of surgery were included in the study. In Group 1, the PECS II block was placed on the chest tube side and bilateral PIFBs were placed at the end of surgery in the operating room. In Group 2, SAPB was placed on the chest tube side and bilateral PIFBs were placed at the end of surgery. Data regarding patient demographics, anesthesia method applied, amount of opioid used intraoperatively, cardiopulmonary bypass time, anesthesia and surgery time, postoperative extubation time, mechanical ventilation time, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of patients at rest and movement at 6th, 12th, 18th, 24th, 48th hours post-extubation, time to and type of first postoperative analgesic, postoperative complications, length of cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) stay and hospital length of stay were recorded from hospital records.

RESULTS

The data of a total of 46 patients (Group 1: PECS II block + PIFB, n=20; Group 2: SAPB+ PIFB, n=26) were analyzed retrospectively. There was no difference in demographic variables between the groups. Intraoperative opioid usage, operation time, Cardiopulmonary bypass time, postoperative mechanical ventilation time, extubation time, ICU discharge time, and length of hospital stay were not statistically different between the groups. The first rescue analgesic requirement time was longer in group 2 than in group 1 but not statistically significant (18.76±15.36 h vs 12.62±10.61 h, p=0.162). The post-extubation VAS scores at rest and movement at the 6th hour were significantly lower in group 2 than in group 1 (1.73±1.28 vs 3.15±2.10, respectively, p=0.02).

CONCLUSION

In our study, the VAS scores at the 6th hour were lower in SAPB + PIFB group than in PECS II + PIFB group. As these blocks can be easy to apply, we thought these combinations could be an alternative for pain relief in cardiac surgery. Prospective randomized studies are needed with a large number of patients.

摘要

背景与目的

心脏手术通常会导致中度至重度的术后疼痛与不适。术后早期疼痛管理不当会引发肺部并发症。重症监护病房(ICU)停留时间和住院时间通常会延长。作为多模式镇痛方案的一部分,筋膜平面阻滞越来越受欢迎。在我们诊所,通过超声进行前锯肌平面阻滞(SAPB)、胸神经阻滞(PECS I-II)和胸肋神经筋膜平面阻滞(PIFB)。我们希望评估接受筋膜平面阻滞的心脏直视手术患者的术后视觉疼痛评分、首次额外使用镇痛剂的时间、拔管时间、发病率和死亡率。

材料与方法

回顾性评估2021年9月1日至2022年6月15日期间48例18岁以上接受胸骨切开术心脏直视手术的患者。本研究仅纳入手术结束时放置胸壁阻滞的患者。第1组在手术结束时于手术室在胸管侧放置PECS II阻滞并双侧放置PIFB。第2组在胸管侧放置SAPB并在手术结束时双侧放置PIFB。从医院记录中记录患者人口统计学数据、应用的麻醉方法、术中使用的阿片类药物量、体外循环时间、麻醉和手术时间、术后拔管时间、机械通气时间、拔管后第6、12、18、24、48小时患者静息和活动时的视觉模拟评分(VAS)、首次术后镇痛的时间和类型、术后并发症、心脏重症监护病房(CICU)停留时间和住院时间。

结果

共对46例患者的数据(第1组:PECS II阻滞+PIFB,n = 20;第2组:SAPB+PIFB,n = 26)进行回顾性分析。两组间人口统计学变量无差异。两组间术中阿片类药物使用量、手术时间、体外循环时间、术后机械通气时间、拔管时间、ICU出院时间和住院时间无统计学差异。第2组首次使用急救镇痛剂的时间比第1组长,但无统计学意义(18.76±15.36小时对12.62±10.61小时,p = 0.162)。第2组拔管后第6小时静息和活动时的VAS评分显著低于第1组(分别为1.73±1.28对3.15±2.10,p = 0.02)。

结论

在我们的研究中,SAPB + PIFB组第6小时的VAS评分低于PECS II + PIFB组。由于这些阻滞易于实施,我们认为这些联合方式可作为心脏手术疼痛缓解的一种选择。需要进行大量患者的前瞻性随机研究。