Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Liver Transpl. 2023 Sep 1;29(9):952-960. doi: 10.1097/LVT.0000000000000143. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
Limited data suggest that ex-situ normothermic liver perfusion (ENLP) may improve the outcomes of donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver transplants compared to static cold storage (SCS). All adult DCD liver transplants performed between 2016 and 2021 were identified in the United Network of Organ Sharing database. ENLP liver transplants were compared to SCS using inverse probability of treatment weighting to balance clinical and demographic confounders. The primary analysis simulated intention-to-treat with inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted Cox models. Compared to SCS DCDs (N = 3,079), recipients of ENLP DCDs (N = 65) had lower Model of End Stage Liver Disease scores at transplant (16.5 v. 18.8, p = 0.033), longer wait times (468 ± 720 vs. 246 ± 467 d; p < 0.001), and received livers from donors with a greater BMI (29.2 vs. 27.5; p = 0.008). ENLP preservation was associated with a lower risk of graft failure (HR 0.31 vs. SCS, 95% CI:0.12-0.86, p = 0.023) and a lower incidence of retransplantation. A sub-analysis restricted to the 20 centers performing ENLP, encompassing 946 SCS DCDs, demonstrated similar results: (HR 0.33 vs. SCS, 95% CI: 0.13-0.94, p = 0.021). Among 111 patients who required retransplantation and where the etiology of graft failure was identified, graft failure due to ischemic cholangiopathy was noted in 1 ENLP and 46 SCS. In this retrospective analysis of the early US DCD ENLP experience, there may exist a graft survival benefit to transplants performed with ENLP compared to SCS.
有限的数据表明,与静态冷保存(SCS)相比,离体常温肝脏灌注(ENLP)可能改善捐赠者心跳停止后(DCD)肝移植的结局。在器官共享联合网络数据库中确定了 2016 年至 2021 年期间进行的所有成人 DCD 肝移植。使用逆概率治疗加权法比较了接受 ENLP 肝移植和 SCS 的患者,以平衡临床和人口统计学混杂因素。主要分析采用意向治疗模拟,使用逆概率治疗加权调整的 Cox 模型。与 SCS DCD 组(N=3079)相比,接受 ENLP DCD 组(N=65)的患者在移植时的终末期肝病模型评分较低(16.5 比 18.8,p=0.033),等待时间更长(468±720 比 246±467 天;p<0.001),并且接受了来自体重指数(BMI)较高的供体的肝脏(29.2 比 27.5;p=0.008)。ENLP 保存与移植物失功风险降低相关(HR 0.31 比 SCS,95%CI:0.12-0.86,p=0.023)和再移植发生率降低相关。在仅限于进行 ENLP 的 20 个中心进行的亚分析中,纳入了 946 例 SCS DCD,结果相似:(HR 0.33 比 SCS,95%CI:0.13-0.94,p=0.021)。在 111 例需要再次移植且明确移植物失功病因的患者中,1 例 ENLP 和 46 例 SCS 出现缺血性胆管炎导致的移植物失功。在这项对美国早期 DCD ENLP 经验的回顾性分析中,与 SCS 相比,ENLP 进行的移植可能存在移植物存活获益。