NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and University of Birmingham, United Kingdom; Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Swiss HPB Centre, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Swiss HPB Centre, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
J Hepatol. 2019 Jan;70(1):50-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.10.005. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver transplantation is known for potentially worse outcomes because of higher rates of graft non-function or irreversible cholangiopathy. The impact of machine liver perfusion techniques on these complications remains elusive. We aimed to provide data on 5-year outcomes in patients receiving DCD liver transplants, after donor organs had been treated by hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE).
Fifty HOPE-treated DCD liver transplants performed in Zurich between 2012 and 3/2017 were matched with 50 primary donation after brain death (DBD) liver transplants, and with 50 untreated DCD liver transplants in Birmingham. Match factors focussed on short cold ischaemia, comparable recipient age and low recipient laboratory model for end-stage liver disease scores. Primary endpoints were post-transplant complications, and non-tumour-related patient death or graft loss.
Despite extended donor warm ischaemia, HOPE-treated DCD liver transplants achieved similar overall graft survival, compared to standard DBD liver transplants. Particularly, graft loss due to any non-tumour-related causes occurred in 8% (4/50) of cases. In contrast, untreated DCD livers resulted in non-tumour-related graft failure in one-third (16/50) of cases (p = 0.005), despite significantly (p <0.001) shorter functional donor warm ischaemia. Five-year graft survival, censored for tumour death, was 94% for HOPE-treated DCD liver transplants vs. 78% in untreated DCD liver transplants (p = 0.024).
The 5-year outcomes of HOPE-treated DCD liver transplants were similar to those of DBD primary transplants and superior to those of untreated DCD liver transplants, despite much higher risk. These results suggest that a simple end-ischaemic perfusion approach is very effective and may open the field for safe utilisation of extended DCD liver grafts.
Machine perfusion techniques are currently being introduced into the clinic, with the aim of optimising injured grafts prior to implantation. While short-term effects of machine liver perfusion have been frequently reported in terms of hepatocellular enzyme release and early graft function, the long-term benefit on irreversible graft loss has been unclear. Herein, we report on 5-year graft survival in donation after cardiac death livers, treated either by conventional cold storage, or by 1-2 h of hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) after cold storage. Graft loss was significantly less in HOPE-treated livers, despite longer donor warm ischaemia times. Therefore, HOPE after cold storage appears to be a simple and effective method to treat high-risk livers before implantation.
由于移植物无功能或不可逆转的胆病发生率较高,与循环死亡供体(DCD)相关的肝移植术后结局较差。机器肝脏灌注技术对这些并发症的影响仍不清楚。我们旨在提供接受 DCD 肝脏移植患者的 5 年结局数据,这些供体器官在接受低温氧合灌注(HOPE)处理后。
2012 年至 2017 年 3 月在苏黎世进行的 50 例 HOPE 治疗的 DCD 肝移植与 50 例原发性脑死亡(DBD)肝移植和 50 例未经处理的 DCD 肝移植进行了匹配。匹配因素集中在短冷缺血、可比受体年龄和低受体实验室模型终末期肝病评分上。主要终点是移植后并发症以及非肿瘤相关的患者死亡或移植物丢失。
尽管供体热缺血时间延长,但与标准 DBD 肝移植相比,HOPE 治疗的 DCD 肝移植获得了相似的总体移植物存活率。特别是,由于任何非肿瘤相关原因导致的移植物丢失仅发生在 8%(4/50)的病例中。相比之下,未经处理的 DCD 肝脏导致三分之一(16/50)的病例发生非肿瘤相关的移植物衰竭(p=0.005),尽管供体热缺血的功能显著缩短(p<0.001)。HOPE 治疗的 DCD 肝移植的 5 年移植物存活率,经肿瘤死亡校正后,为 94%,而未经处理的 DCD 肝移植为 78%(p=0.024)。
尽管风险较高,但 HOPE 治疗的 DCD 肝移植的 5 年结局与 DBD 原发性移植相似,优于未经处理的 DCD 肝移植。这些结果表明,简单的末端缺血性灌注方法非常有效,可能为安全利用延长的 DCD 肝移植物开辟道路。
目前正在将机器灌注技术引入临床,旨在在植入前优化受损移植物。虽然机器肝脏灌注的短期效果经常在肝细胞酶释放和早期移植物功能方面得到报道,但对不可逆移植物丢失的长期益处尚不清楚。在此,我们报告了接受心脏死亡供体肝脏的 5 年移植物存活率,这些供体肝脏要么接受常规低温储存,要么在低温储存后接受 1-2 小时的低温氧合灌注(HOPE)治疗。尽管供体热缺血时间延长,但在接受 HOPE 治疗的肝脏中,移植物丢失明显减少。因此,HOPE 似乎是在植入前治疗高危肝脏的一种简单有效的方法。