Messler Ana C, Hargrave David D, Trittschuh Emily H, Sordahl Jeffrey
Boise VA Medical Center, Boise, ID, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth/Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Clin Neuropsychol. 2023 Apr 5:1-20. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2023.2192422.
Examination of current tele-neuropsychology (teleNP) practices and attitudes within the clinical neuropsychology community, conducted September - November 2022. Clinical neuropsychologists in U.S. and U.S. territories were invited to participate in an online survey of teleNP practices. The final sample consisted of 326 neuropsychologists. Forty-six percent of the sample indicated they currently practice teleNP. Fourteen percent of the sample not currently practicing teleNP were considering practicing teleNP. The remainder was not practicing teleNP and had no plans to (41%). Most respondents agreed that teleNP where the patient is located in clinic is generally feasible and acceptable (71%); to a lesser extent, teleNP to home was viewed as feasible and acceptable (45% agreed, while 16% rated feasibility and acceptability as neutral). Only 11% agreed that teleNP is a feasible and acceptable part of forensic neuropsychology practice. Most respondents (74%) currently engaged in teleNP either agreed or strongly agreed that teleNP enabled them to provide similar quality of care as face-to-face neuropsychology. Current practice of teleNP was positively correlated with career phase, with greater adoption among early career neuropsychologists. Current teleNP providers anticipated teleNP to permanently comprise 31-40% of their overall practice on average. There is variability in teleNP acceptance by setting and career phase. While hesitancy around teleNP was expressed by some, results show that the adoption of teleNP has increased over time and remains a permanent feature of practice for a substantial number of respondents three years following onset of the Covid-19 pandemic.
2022年9月至11月对临床神经心理学界当前的远程神经心理学(teleNP)实践与态度进行的调查。邀请了美国及美国属地的临床神经心理学家参与一项关于teleNP实践的在线调查。最终样本包括326名神经心理学家。46%的样本表示他们目前从事teleNP实践。14%目前未从事teleNP实践的样本表示正在考虑从事teleNP实践。其余的则未从事teleNP实践且没有计划这么做(41%)。大多数受访者认为,患者在诊所的teleNP通常是可行且可接受的(71%);在较小程度上,认为在家中的teleNP是可行且可接受的(45%表示同意,16%对可行性和可接受性持中立态度)。只有11%的人认为teleNP是法医神经心理学实践中可行且可接受的一部分。目前从事teleNP的大多数受访者(74%)要么同意要么强烈同意teleNP使他们能够提供与面对面神经心理学相似的护理质量。teleNP的当前实践与职业阶段呈正相关,早期职业神经心理学家的采用率更高。目前的teleNP提供者预计teleNP平均将永久占其总体实践的31 - 40%。不同环境和职业阶段对teleNP的接受程度存在差异。虽然一些人对teleNP表示犹豫,但结果表明,随着时间的推移,teleNP的采用率有所提高,并且在新冠疫情爆发三年后,对于大量受访者来说,它仍然是实践中的一个永久特征。