• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将不容忍正常化:基督教右翼团体阻止 LGBTIQ+ 在南非学校中被包容的努力。

Normalising intolerance: the efforts of Christian Right groups to block LGBTIQ+ inclusion in South African schools.

机构信息

Department of Sociology and Social Anthropology, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.

Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden.

出版信息

Cult Health Sex. 2024 Feb;26(2):236-247. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2023.2195913. Epub 2023 Apr 5.

DOI:10.1080/13691058.2023.2195913
PMID:37017181
Abstract

Post-apartheid, South Africa has come a long way in making the inclusion of gender and sexuality equality explicit in its Constitution. To make schools more inclusive for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex and queer (LGBTIQ+) identifying learners, the Department of Basic Education has developed what it claims are South Africa's first guidelines regarding sexual orientation, gender identity and sex characteristics (SOGIESC). Despite the emphasis on equality in South Africa's post-apartheid policies, which set out to protect the rights of LGBTIQ+ individuals, there has been a backlash from conservative advocacy groups, many with links to the US Christian Right. This paper argues that contrary to the disinformation being propagated by anti-LGBTIQ + groups, it is queer and transgender individuals who experience extreme levels of violence and marginalisation in schools. The empirical research makes explicit the bullying and exclusion that transgender and gender-diverse youth experience in school; however, this evidence is neglected in conservative claims that SOGIESC (SOGIESC) guidelines and Comprehensive Sexuality Education (CSE) endanger other learners. Notably, and in stark contrast to those advocating for measures to make schools safer for LGBTIQ + learners, far-right advocacy groups have no empirical basis to support their claims.

摘要

后种族隔离时代的南非在宪法中明确纳入性别和平等方面取得了长足的进步。为了使学校更能包容女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别、间性人和酷儿(LGBTIQ+)认同的学习者,基础教育部制定了据称是南非关于性取向、性别认同和性特征(SOGIESC)的第一批准则。尽管南非后种族隔离政策强调平等,旨在保护 LGBTIQ+个人的权利,但保守派倡导团体对此提出了强烈反对,其中许多团体与美国基督教右翼有关。本文认为,与反 LGBTIQ+团体传播的虚假信息相反,在学校里,正是酷儿和跨性别者经历着极端的暴力和边缘化。实证研究明确了跨性别和性别多样化青年在学校中所经历的欺凌和排斥;然而,在保守派声称 SOGIESC(SOGIESC)准则和全面性教育(CSE)危害其他学习者的说法中,这些证据被忽视了。值得注意的是,与那些倡导采取措施使学校更安全的 LGBTIQ+学习者的人形成鲜明对比的是,极右翼倡导团体没有支持其主张的经验依据。

相似文献

1
Normalising intolerance: the efforts of Christian Right groups to block LGBTIQ+ inclusion in South African schools.将不容忍正常化:基督教右翼团体阻止 LGBTIQ+ 在南非学校中被包容的努力。
Cult Health Sex. 2024 Feb;26(2):236-247. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2023.2195913. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
2
Characterization of content associated with lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex, and queer individuals in Chilean medical schools: a cross-sectional survey.智利医学院中与女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别、间性和酷儿个体相关内容的特征:一项横断面调查。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Feb 21;24(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05150-6.
3
Contesting everyday violence: Resilience pathways of gay and transgender youth in Peru.对抗日常暴力:秘鲁同性恋和跨性别青年的复原力路径
Glob Public Health. 2021 May;16(5):706-728. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2020.1856397. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
4
Queering the history of South African psychology: From apartheid to LGBTI+ affirmative practices.质疑南非心理学史:从种族隔离到 LGBTI+肯定实践。
Am Psychol. 2019 Nov;74(8):954-966. doi: 10.1037/amp0000557.
5
"Son of the Soil … Daughters of the Land": poetry writing as a strategy of citizen-making for lesbian, gay, and bisexual migrants and asylum seekers in Johannesburg.“土地之子……土地之女”:诗歌创作作为约翰内斯堡男同性恋、女同性恋和双性恋移民及寻求庇护者成为公民的一种策略。
Agenda. 2016 Jan 2;30(1):85-95. doi: 10.1080/10130950.2016.1189652. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
6
Perceptions and Experiences of Intrusive Behavior and Stalking: Comparing LGBTIQ and Heterosexual Groups.侵入性行为和跟踪的感知和体验:比较 LGBTIQ 和异性恋群体。
J Interpers Violence. 2019 Apr;34(7):1388-1409. doi: 10.1177/0886260516651313. Epub 2016 May 27.
7
LGBTIQ+ Homelessness: A Review of the Literature.LGBTIQ+ 无家可归问题综述:文献回顾
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 26;16(15):2677. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16152677.
8
"Gay Guys are Shit-Lovers" and "Lesbians are Obsessed With Fingers": The (Mis)Representation of LGBTIQ People in Thai News Media.“男同性恋者是恋粪者”以及“女同性恋者痴迷手指”:泰国新闻媒体对LGBTIQ群体的(错误)呈现
J Homosex. 2019;66(2):260-273. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2017.1398026. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
9
Discrimination on Grounds of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity: The Limits of Human Rights in Africa.基于性倾向和性别认同的歧视:非洲人权的局限。
J Homosex. 2024 Feb 23;71(3):803-827. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2022.2132577. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
10
Scrambling for access: availability, accessibility, acceptability and quality of healthcare for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people in South Africa.争夺医疗机会:南非女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和跨性别者获得医疗保健的可及性、可利用性、可接受性及质量
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2017 May 30;17(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12914-017-0124-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancing human rights, health equity, and equitable health policy with LGBTQ+ people: An American Academy of Nursing consensus paper.促进 LGBTQ+ 群体的人权、健康公平及公平的健康政策:美国护理学会共识文件。
Nurs Outlook. 2025 Jul 18;73(5):102496. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2025.102496.