Department of Sociology and Social Anthropology, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden.
Cult Health Sex. 2024 Feb;26(2):236-247. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2023.2195913. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
Post-apartheid, South Africa has come a long way in making the inclusion of gender and sexuality equality explicit in its Constitution. To make schools more inclusive for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex and queer (LGBTIQ+) identifying learners, the Department of Basic Education has developed what it claims are South Africa's first guidelines regarding sexual orientation, gender identity and sex characteristics (SOGIESC). Despite the emphasis on equality in South Africa's post-apartheid policies, which set out to protect the rights of LGBTIQ+ individuals, there has been a backlash from conservative advocacy groups, many with links to the US Christian Right. This paper argues that contrary to the disinformation being propagated by anti-LGBTIQ + groups, it is queer and transgender individuals who experience extreme levels of violence and marginalisation in schools. The empirical research makes explicit the bullying and exclusion that transgender and gender-diverse youth experience in school; however, this evidence is neglected in conservative claims that SOGIESC (SOGIESC) guidelines and Comprehensive Sexuality Education (CSE) endanger other learners. Notably, and in stark contrast to those advocating for measures to make schools safer for LGBTIQ + learners, far-right advocacy groups have no empirical basis to support their claims.
后种族隔离时代的南非在宪法中明确纳入性别和平等方面取得了长足的进步。为了使学校更能包容女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别、间性人和酷儿(LGBTIQ+)认同的学习者,基础教育部制定了据称是南非关于性取向、性别认同和性特征(SOGIESC)的第一批准则。尽管南非后种族隔离政策强调平等,旨在保护 LGBTIQ+个人的权利,但保守派倡导团体对此提出了强烈反对,其中许多团体与美国基督教右翼有关。本文认为,与反 LGBTIQ+团体传播的虚假信息相反,在学校里,正是酷儿和跨性别者经历着极端的暴力和边缘化。实证研究明确了跨性别和性别多样化青年在学校中所经历的欺凌和排斥;然而,在保守派声称 SOGIESC(SOGIESC)准则和全面性教育(CSE)危害其他学习者的说法中,这些证据被忽视了。值得注意的是,与那些倡导采取措施使学校更安全的 LGBTIQ+学习者的人形成鲜明对比的是,极右翼倡导团体没有支持其主张的经验依据。