Suppr超能文献

口服抗生素在左半结肠癌和直肠癌手术中机械肠道准备中的应用与手术部位感染减少的关系。

Association of the Addition of Oral Antibiotics to Mechanical Bowel Preparation for Left Colon and Rectal Cancer Resections With Reduction of Surgical Site Infections.

机构信息

Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas.

出版信息

JAMA Surg. 2018 Feb 1;153(2):114-121. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.3827.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Surgical site infections (SSIs) after colorectal surgery remain a significant complication, particularly for patients with cancer, because they can delay the administration of adjuvant therapy. A combination of oral antibiotics and mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) is a potential, yet controversial, SSI prevention strategy.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the association of the addition of oral antibiotics to MBP with preventing SSIs in left colon and rectal cancer resections and its association with the timely administration of adjuvant therapy.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective review was performed of 89 patients undergoing left colon and rectal cancer resections from October 1, 2013, to December 31, 2016, at a single institution. A bowel regimen of oral antibiotics and MBP (neomycin sulfate, metronidazole hydrochloride, and magnesium citrate) was implemented August 1, 2015. Patients receiving MBP and oral antibiotics and those undergoing MBP without oral antibiotics were compared using univariate analysis. Multivariable logistic regression controlling for factors that may affect SSIs was used to evaluate the association between use of oral antibiotics and MBP and the occurrence of SSIs.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Surgical site infections within 30 days of the index procedure and time to adjuvant therapy.

RESULTS

Of the 89 patients (5 women and 84 men; mean [SD] age, 65.3 [9.2] years) in the study, 49 underwent surgery with MBP but without oral antibiotics and 40 underwent surgery with MBP and oral antibiotics. The patients who received oral antibiotics and MBP were younger than those who received only MBP (mean [SD] age, 62.6 [9.1] vs 67.5 [8.8] years; P = .01), but these 2 cohorts of patients were otherwise similar in baseline demographic, clinical, and cancer characteristics. Surgical approach (minimally invasive vs open) and case type were similarly distributed; however, the median operative time of patients who received oral antibiotics and MBP was longer than that of patients who received MBP only (391 minutes [interquartile range, 302-550 minutes] vs 348 minutes [interquartile range, 248-425 minutes]; P = .03). The overall SSI rate was lower for patients who received oral antibiotics and MBP than for patients who received MBP only (3 [8%] vs 13 [27%]; P = .03), with no deep or organ space SSIs or anastomotic leaks in patients who received oral antibiotics and MBP compared with 9 organ space SSIs (18%; P = .004) and 5 anastomotic leaks (10%; P = .06) in patients who received MBP only. Despite this finding, there was no difference in median days to adjuvant therapy between the 2 cohorts (60 days [interquartile range, 46-73 days] for patients who received MBP only vs 72 days [interquartile range, 59-85 days] for patients who received oral antibiotics and MBP; P = .13). Oral antibiotics and MBP (odds ratio, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.02-0.86; P = .04) and minimally invasive surgery (odds ratio, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.05-0.89; P = .03) were independently associated with reduced odds of SSIs.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The combination of oral antibiotics and MBP is associated with a significant decrease in the rate of SSIs and should be considered for patients undergoing elective left colon and rectal cancer resections.

摘要

背景:结直肠手术后的手术部位感染(SSI)仍然是一个严重的并发症,尤其是对于癌症患者,因为它可能会延迟辅助治疗的进行。口服抗生素和机械肠道准备(MBP)的联合使用是一种潜在的、有争议的 SSI 预防策略。

目的:确定口服抗生素联合 MBP 在预防左半结肠癌和直肠癌切除术后 SSI 中的作用,以及其与辅助治疗及时性的关系。

设计、地点和参与者:回顾性分析了 2013 年 10 月 1 日至 2016 年 12 月 31 日在一家单机构进行的左半结肠癌和直肠癌切除术的 89 例患者的病历。2015 年 8 月 1 日开始实施口服抗生素和 MBP(硫酸新霉素、盐酸甲硝唑和柠檬酸镁)的肠道方案。使用单变量分析比较接受 MBP 和口服抗生素的患者和仅接受 MBP 的患者。使用多变量逻辑回归控制可能影响 SSI 的因素,以评估口服抗生素和 MBP 的使用与 SSI 的发生之间的关系。

主要结局和测量指标:指数手术后 30 天内的手术部位感染和辅助治疗时间。

结果:在研究的 89 例患者(5 名女性和 84 名男性;平均[标准差]年龄 65.3[9.2]岁)中,49 例接受 MBP 但未接受口服抗生素治疗,40 例接受 MBP 和口服抗生素治疗。接受口服抗生素和 MBP 的患者比仅接受 MBP 的患者年轻(平均[标准差]年龄 62.6[9.1]岁 vs 67.5[8.8]岁;P=0.01),但这两组患者在基线人口统计学、临床和癌症特征方面相似。手术方法(微创与开放)和病例类型分布相似;然而,接受口服抗生素和 MBP 的患者的中位手术时间长于仅接受 MBP 的患者(391 分钟[四分位距,302-550 分钟] vs 348 分钟[四分位距,248-425 分钟];P=0.03)。接受口服抗生素和 MBP 的患者的总体 SSI 发生率低于仅接受 MBP 的患者(3[8%]vs 13[27%];P=0.03),与仅接受 MBP 的患者中 9 例器官间隙 SSI(18%)和 5 例吻合口漏(10%)相比,接受口服抗生素和 MBP 的患者中无深部或器官间隙 SSI 或吻合口漏(P=0.004)。尽管如此,两组患者的中位辅助治疗时间并无差异(仅接受 MBP 的患者为 60 天[四分位距,46-73 天],接受口服抗生素和 MBP 的患者为 72 天[四分位距,59-85 天];P=0.13)。口服抗生素和 MBP(比值比,0.11;95%CI,0.02-0.86;P=0.04)和微创手术(比值比,0.22;95%CI,0.05-0.89;P=0.03)与 SSI 发生率降低独立相关。

结论和相关性:口服抗生素联合 MBP 可显著降低 SSI 发生率,应考虑用于接受择期左半结肠癌和直肠癌切除术的患者。

相似文献

4
Preoperative oral antibiotics reduce infections after colorectal cancer surgery.术前口服抗生素可降低结直肠癌手术后的感染率。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016 Dec;401(8):1153-1162. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1513-1. Epub 2016 Sep 20.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Preoperative oral antibiotics reduce infections after colorectal cancer surgery.术前口服抗生素可降低结直肠癌手术后的感染率。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016 Dec;401(8):1153-1162. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1513-1. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
6
Antimicrobial Bowel Preparation for Elective Colon Surgery.择期结肠手术的抗菌肠道准备
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2016 Jun;17(3):269-74. doi: 10.1089/sur.2015.271. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
10
Nationwide analysis of outcomes of bowel preparation in colon surgery.结肠手术肠道准备结果的全国性分析。
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 May;220(5):912-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.02.008. Epub 2015 Feb 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验