Suppr超能文献

有无计算机化医师医嘱录入系统时的用药记录工作流程、时间要求及质量——一项基于模拟的实验室研究

Workflow, Time Requirement, and Quality of Medication Documentation with or without a Computerized Physician Order Entry System-A Simulation-Based Lab Study.

作者信息

Jungreithmayr Viktoria, Haefeli Walter E, Seidling Hanna M

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Cooperation Unit Clinical Pharmacy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Methods Inf Med. 2023 May;62(1-02):40-48. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1758631. Epub 2023 Apr 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The introduction of a computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system is changing workflows and redistributing tasks among health care professionals.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to describe exemplary changes in workflow, to objectify the time required for medication documentation, and to evaluate documentation quality with and without a CPOE system (Cerner® i.s.h.med).

METHODS

Workflows were assessed either through direct observation and in-person interviews or through semistructured online interviews with clinical staff involved in medication documentation. Two case scenarios were developed consisting of exemplary medications (case 1 = 6 drugs and case 2 = 11 drugs). Physicians and nurses/documentation assistants were observed documenting the case scenarios according to workflows established prior to CPOE implementation and those newly established with CPOE implementation, measuring the time spent on each step in the documentation process. Subsequently, the documentation quality of the documented medication was assessed according to a previously established and published methodology.

RESULTS

CPOE implementation simplified medication documentation. The overall time needed for medication documentation increased from a median of 12:12 min (range: 07:29-21:10 min) without to 14:40 min (09:18-25:18) with the CPOE system ( = 0.002). With CPOE, less time was spent documenting peroral prescriptions and more time documenting intravenous/subcutaneous prescriptions. For physicians, documentation time approximately doubled, while nurses achieved time savings. Overall, the documentation quality increased from a median fulfillment score of 66.7% without to 100.0% with the CPOE system ( < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study revealed that CPOE implementation simplified the medication documentation process but increased the time spent on medication documentation by 20% in two fictitious cases. This increased time resulted in higher documentation quality, occurred at the expense of physicians, and was primarily due to intravenous/subcutaneous prescriptions. Therefore, measures to support physicians with complex prescriptions in the CPOE system should be established.

摘要

背景

计算机化医师医嘱录入(CPOE)系统的引入正在改变工作流程,并在医疗保健专业人员之间重新分配任务。

目的

本研究的目的是描述工作流程中的典型变化,客观确定用药记录所需时间,并评估使用和不使用CPOE系统(Cerner® i.s.h.med)时的记录质量。

方法

通过直接观察和面对面访谈,或通过对参与用药记录的临床工作人员进行半结构化在线访谈来评估工作流程。开发了两个病例场景,包括典型药物(病例1 = 6种药物,病例2 = 11种药物)。观察医生和护士/记录助手按照CPOE实施前建立的工作流程以及CPOE实施后新建立的工作流程记录病例场景,测量记录过程中每个步骤所花费的时间。随后,根据先前建立并发表的方法评估所记录药物的记录质量。

结果

CPOE的实施简化了用药记录。用药记录所需的总时间从无CPOE系统时的中位数12:12分钟(范围:07:29 - 21:10分钟)增加到有CPOE系统时的14:40分钟(09:18 - 25:18)(P = 0.002)。使用CPOE时,口服处方记录所花时间减少,静脉内/皮下处方记录所花时间增加。对于医生来说,记录时间大约翻倍,而护士实现了时间节省。总体而言,记录质量从无CPOE系统时的中位数完成率66.7%提高到有CPOE系统时的100.0%(P < 0.001)。

结论

本研究表明,CPOE的实施简化了用药记录过程,但在两个虚拟病例中用药记录所花时间增加了20%。时间增加带来了更高的记录质量,以医生为代价,主要是由于静脉内/皮下处方。因此,应制定措施在CPOE系统中支持医生处理复杂处方。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验