Suppr超能文献

计算机化医师医嘱录入系统实施对 20 项不同用药记录标准的影响——一项前后对照研究。

The impact of a computerized physician order entry system implementation on 20 different criteria of medication documentation-a before-and-after study.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.

Cooperation Unit Clinical Pharmacy, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Oct 11;21(1):279. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01607-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The medication process is complex and error-prone. To avoid medication errors, a medication order should fulfil certain criteria, such as good readability and comprehensiveness. In this context, a computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system can be helpful. This study aims to investigate the distinct effects on the quality of prescription documentation of a CPOE system implemented on general wards in a large tertiary care hospital.

METHODS

In a retrospective analysis, the prescriptions of two groups of 160 patients each were evaluated, with data collected before and after the introduction of a CPOE system. According to nationally available recommendations on prescription documentation, it was assessed whether each prescription fulfilled the established 20 criteria for a safe, complete, and actionable prescription. The resulting fulfilment scores (prescription-Fscores) were compared between the pre-implementation and the post-implementation group and a multivariable analysis was performed to identify the effects of further covariates, i.e., the prescription category, the ward, and the number of concurrently prescribed drugs. Additionally, the fulfilment of the 20 criteria was assessed at an individual criterion-level (denoted criteria-Fscores).

RESULTS

The overall mean prescription-Fscore increased from 57.4% ± 12.0% (n = 1850 prescriptions) before to 89.8% ± 7.2% (n = 1592 prescriptions) after the implementation (p < 0.001). At the level of individual criteria, criteria-Fscores significantly improved in most criteria (n = 14), with 6 criteria reaching a total score of 100% after CPOE implementation. Four criteria showed no statistically significant difference and in two criteria, criteria-Fscores deteriorated significantly. A multivariable analysis confirmed the large impact of the CPOE implementation on prescription-Fscores which was consistent when adjusting for the confounding potential of further covariates.

CONCLUSIONS

While the quality of prescription documentation generally increases with implementation of a CPOE system, certain criteria are difficult to fulfil even with the help of a CPOE system. This highlights the need to accompany a CPOE implementation with a thorough evaluation that can provide important information on possible improvements of the software, training needs of prescribers, or the necessity of modifying the underlying clinical processes.

摘要

背景

药物治疗过程复杂且容易出错。为了避免用药错误,医嘱应满足一定的标准,如良好的可读性和全面性。在这种情况下,计算机化医嘱录入(CPOE)系统可能会有所帮助。本研究旨在调查在大型三级保健医院的普通病房实施 CPOE 系统对处方文件质量的不同影响。

方法

在回顾性分析中,评估了两组各 160 名患者的处方,每组分别收集了实施 CPOE 系统前后的数据。根据处方文件的国家可用建议,评估了每个处方是否满足 20 项安全、完整和可操作处方的标准。比较了实施前后的处方 F 分数(处方 F 分数),并进行了多变量分析,以确定进一步的协变量(即处方类别、病房和同时开具的药物数量)的影响。此外,还评估了 20 项标准的个别标准(表示为标准 F 分数)的满足情况。

结果

总体平均处方 F 分数从实施前的 57.4%±12.0%(n=1850 份处方)增加到实施后的 89.8%±7.2%(n=1592 份处方)(p<0.001)。在个别标准的水平上,大多数标准的标准 F 分数都有显著提高(n=14),其中 6 个标准在实施 CPOE 后达到了 100%的总分数。有 4 个标准没有统计学上的显著差异,而在 2 个标准中,标准 F 分数明显恶化。多变量分析证实了 CPOE 实施对处方 F 分数的巨大影响,当调整进一步协变量的潜在混杂因素时,这种影响仍然一致。

结论

虽然实施 CPOE 系统通常会提高处方文件的质量,但即使有 CPOE 系统的帮助,某些标准也很难满足。这突出表明,在实施 CPOE 的同时,需要进行彻底的评估,这可以提供有关软件改进、开方者培训需求或修改潜在临床流程必要性的重要信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/831b/8504043/ff4d9b12b89b/12911_2021_1607_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验