Suppr超能文献

共济失调临床结局评估和登记发展的共识建议:共济失调全球倡议(AGI)工作组专家指南。

Consensus Recommendations for Clinical Outcome Assessments and Registry Development in Ataxias: Ataxia Global Initiative (AGI) Working Group Expert Guidance.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Venusberg-Campus, 53127, Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

Cerebellum. 2024 Jun;23(3):924-930. doi: 10.1007/s12311-023-01547-z. Epub 2023 Apr 5.

Abstract

To accelerate and facilitate clinical trials, the Ataxia Global Initiative (AGI) was established as a worldwide research platform for trial readiness in ataxias. One of AGI's major goals is the harmonization and standardization of outcome assessments. Clinical outcome assessments (COAs) that describe or reflect how a patient feels or functions are indispensable for clinical trials, but similarly important for observational studies and in routine patient care. The AGI working group on COAs has defined a set of data including a graded catalog of COAs that are recommended as a standard for future assessment and sharing of clinical data and joint clinical studies. Two datasets were defined: a mandatory dataset (minimal dataset) that can ideally be obtained during a routine clinical consultation and a more demanding extended dataset that is useful for research purposes. In the future, the currently most widely used clinician-reported outcome measure (ClinRO) in ataxia, the scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia (SARA), should be developed into a generally accepted instrument that can be used in upcoming clinical trials. Furthermore, there is an urgent need (i) to obtain more data on ataxia-specific, patient-reported outcome measures (PROs), (ii) to demonstrate and optimize sensitivity to change of many COAs, and (iii) to establish methods and evidence of anchoring change in COAs in patient meaningfulness, e.g., by determining patient-derived minimally meaningful thresholds of change.

摘要

为了加速和便利临床试验,Ataxia Global Initiative(AGI)成立了,作为一个全球性的临床试验准备研究平台,用于治疗各种共济失调。AGI 的主要目标之一是协调和标准化结局评估。描述或反映患者感受或功能的临床结局评估(COAs)对于临床试验是不可或缺的,但对于观察性研究和常规患者护理同样重要。AGI COAs 工作组定义了一组数据,包括一系列分级的 COAs,这些 COAs被推荐作为未来评估和共享临床数据和联合临床研究的标准。定义了两个数据集:一个强制性数据集(最小数据集),理想情况下可以在常规临床咨询中获得,以及一个更具挑战性的扩展数据集,可用于研究目的。未来,目前在共济失调中最广泛使用的临床医生报告的结局测量(ClinRO),即共济失调评估和分级量表(SARA),应该发展成为一种被广泛接受的仪器,可以用于即将进行的临床试验。此外,迫切需要(i)获得更多关于特定于共济失调的患者报告结局测量(PROs)的数据,(ii)证明和优化许多 COAs 的变化敏感性,以及(iii)建立 COAs 在患者意义上变化的锚定方法和证据,例如,通过确定患者衍生的最小有意义的变化阈值。

相似文献

2
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
3
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
4
Occupational therapy for cognitive impairment in stroke patients.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 29;3(3):CD006430. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006430.pub3.
5
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
7
Clinical symptoms, signs and tests for identification of impending and current water-loss dehydration in older people.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 30;2015(4):CD009647. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009647.pub2.
9
The effect of financial incentives on the quality of health care provided by primary care physicians.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep 7(9):CD008451. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008451.pub2.

引用本文的文献

3
Hereditary Ataxias in Argentina.
Cerebellum. 2025 Apr 8;24(3):82. doi: 10.1007/s12311-025-01834-x.
5
Eye Tracking during Passage Reading Supports Precise Oculomotor Assessment in Ataxias.
medRxiv. 2025 Jan 17:2025.01.13.25320487. doi: 10.1101/2025.01.13.25320487.
6
Effects of physiotherapy on degenerative cerebellar ataxia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Front Neurol. 2025 Jan 10;15:1491142. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1491142. eCollection 2024.
7
Content Validity of the Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale in Patients with Spinocerebellar Ataxia.
Neurol Ther. 2025 Apr;14(2):547-563. doi: 10.1007/s40120-024-00704-8. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
8
L-arginine in patients with spinocerebellar ataxia type 6: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Nov 25;78:102952. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102952. eCollection 2024 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Temporal Dynamics of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia in Spinocerebellar Ataxias.
Mov Disord. 2023 Jan;38(1):35-44. doi: 10.1002/mds.29255. Epub 2022 Oct 23.
2
Differential Temporal Dynamics of Axial and Appendicular Ataxia in SCA3.
Mov Disord. 2022 Sep;37(9):1850-1860. doi: 10.1002/mds.29135. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
3
Paving the Way Toward Meaningful Trials in Ataxias: An Ataxia Global Initiative Perspective.
Mov Disord. 2022 Jun;37(6):1125-1130. doi: 10.1002/mds.29032. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
4
The CCAS-scale in hereditary ataxias: helpful on the group level, particularly in SCA3, but limited in individual patients.
J Neurol. 2022 Aug;269(8):4363-4374. doi: 10.1007/s00415-022-11071-5. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
5
The ARCA Registry: A Collaborative Global Platform for Advancing Trial Readiness in Autosomal Recessive Cerebellar Ataxias.
Front Neurol. 2021 Jun 25;12:677551. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.677551. eCollection 2021.
6
Development and Validation of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure of Ataxia.
Mov Disord. 2021 Oct;36(10):2367-2377. doi: 10.1002/mds.28670. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
7
Progression characteristics of the European Friedreich's Ataxia Consortium for Translational Studies (EFACTS): a 4-year cohort study.
Lancet Neurol. 2021 May;20(5):362-372. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00027-2. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
8
Development of SARA , a New Video-Based Tool for the Assessment of Ataxia at Home.
Mov Disord. 2021 May;36(5):1242-1246. doi: 10.1002/mds.28478. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
9
Digital Measures That Matter to Patients: A Framework to Guide the Selection and Development of Digital Measures of Health.
Digit Biomark. 2020 Sep 15;4(3):69-77. doi: 10.1159/000509725. eCollection 2020 Sep-Dec.
10
Assessment of Ataxia Rating Scales and Cerebellar Functional Tests: Critique and Recommendations.
Mov Disord. 2021 Feb;36(2):283-297. doi: 10.1002/mds.28313. Epub 2020 Oct 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验