Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, 399 Bathurst St., Mc Laughlin Pavilion, 2-405, Toronto, ON, M5T 2S8, Canada.
Hospital Universitario Mayor, Méderi, Bogotá, Colombia.
Can J Anaesth. 2023 May;70(5):869-877. doi: 10.1007/s12630-023-02400-x. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
SARS-CoV-2 poses a significant occupational health threat to health care workers performing aerosol-generating medical procedures, with a threefold increased risk of a positive test and predicted infection compared with the general population. Nevertheless, the personal protective equipment (PPE) configuration that provides better protection with lower contamination rates is still unknown.
We enrolled 40 practitioners with airway management training (anesthesiologists, anesthesia assistants/nurses) in an exploratory, simulation-based randomized study. We evaluated the performance of a novel, locally designed hood (n = 20) in terms of protection from surrogate contamination using an ultraviolet (UV) marker during a standardized urgent intubation procedure and a simulated episode of coughing in a high-fidelity simulation setting compared with standard PPE (n = 20). The primary outcome was the presence of residual UV fluorescent contamination on any base clothing or exposed skin of the upper body after doffing PPE assessed by a blinded evaluator.
The proportion of participants with residual contamination on any base clothing or exposed skin of the upper body after doffing was less than half in the hood PPE group compared with the standard PPE group (8/20 [40%] vs 18/20 [90%], respectively; P = 0.002).
Compared with standard PPE, enhanced PPE with a locally designed prototype hood was associated with reduced contamination of the upper torso and fewer body areas being exposed to droplets after a simulated aerosol-generating scenario without designed airflow.
ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04373096); registered 4 May 2020.
SARS-CoV-2 对进行气溶胶生成医疗程序的医护人员构成重大职业健康威胁,与一般人群相比,检测呈阳性和预测感染的风险增加了三倍。然而,提供更好保护且污染率更低的个人防护设备(PPE)配置仍不清楚。
我们招募了 40 名具有气道管理培训(麻醉师、麻醉助理/护士)的从业者参加一项探索性、基于模拟的随机研究。我们在高保真模拟环境中使用标准紧急插管程序和模拟咳嗽发作来评估一种新型本地设计的头罩(n = 20)在保护免受替代物污染方面的性能,使用紫外线(UV)标记进行评估,与标准 PPE(n = 20)相比。主要结局是由盲法评估员评估脱卸 PPE 后任何基础衣物或上半身暴露皮肤仍存在残留 UV 荧光污染的情况。
与标准 PPE 组相比,在头罩 PPE 组中,任何基础衣物或上半身暴露皮肤仍存在残留污染的参与者比例不到一半(8/20 [40%] 与 18/20 [90%] 相比,P = 0.002)。
与标准 PPE 相比,增强型 PPE 采用本地设计的原型头罩与减少上半身污染和模拟气溶胶生成情况后更多身体区域暴露在飞沫中相关,而没有设计气流。
ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT04373096);2020 年 5 月 4 日注册。