Wang Lu, Jiang Luyang, Xin Ling, Jiang Bailin, Chen Yu, Feng Yi
Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Front Surg. 2023 Mar 20;10:1128691. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1128691. eCollection 2023.
Epidural and paravertebral block reduce the extubation time in patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia but are relatively contraindicated in heparinized patients due to the potential risk of hematoma. The Pecto-intercostal fascial block (PIFB) is an alternative in such patients.
This is a single-center randomized controlled trial. Patients scheduled for elective open cardiac surgery were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to receive PIFB (30 ml 0.3% ropivacaine plus 2.5 mg dexamethasone on each side) or saline (30 ml normal saline on each side) after induction of general anesthesia. The primary outcome was extubation time after surgery. Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption during surgery, postoperative pain scores, adverse events related to opioids, and length of stay in the hospital.
A total of 50 patients (mean age: 61.8 years; 34 men) were randomized (25 in each group). The surgeries included sole coronary artery bypass grafting in 38 patients, sole valve surgery in three patients, and both procedures in the remaining nine patients. Cardiopulmonary bypass was used in 20 (40%) patients. The time to extubation was 9.4 ± 4.1 h in the PIFB group vs. 12.1 ± 4.6 h in the control group ( = 0.031). Opioid (sufentanil) consumption during surgery was 153.2 ± 48.3 and 199.4 ± 51.7 μg, respectively ( = 0.002). In comparison to the control group, the PIFB group had a lower pain score while coughing (1.45 ± 1.43 vs. 3.00 ± 1.71, = 0.021) and a similar pain score at rest at 12 h after surgery. The two groups did not differ in the rate of adverse events.
PIFB decreased the time to extubation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
This trial is registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100052743) on November 4, 2021.
硬膜外阻滞和椎旁阻滞可缩短全身麻醉手术患者的拔管时间,但由于存在血肿形成的潜在风险,在接受肝素治疗的患者中相对禁忌使用。胸肋筋膜阻滞(PIFB)是这类患者的一种替代方法。
这是一项单中心随机对照试验。计划接受择期心脏直视手术的患者在全身麻醉诱导后按1:1比例随机分组,分别接受PIFB(每侧30 ml 0.3%罗哌卡因加2.5 mg地塞米松)或生理盐水(每侧30 ml生理盐水)。主要结局指标为术后拔管时间。次要结局指标包括术中阿片类药物用量、术后疼痛评分、与阿片类药物相关的不良事件以及住院时间。
共有50例患者(平均年龄:61.8岁;男性34例)被随机分组(每组25例)。手术包括38例单纯冠状动脉搭桥术、3例单纯瓣膜手术以及其余9例两种手术均做。20例(40%)患者使用了体外循环。PIFB组的拔管时间为9.4±4.1小时,而对照组为12.1± 4.6小时(P = 0.031)。术中阿片类药物(舒芬太尼)用量分别为153.2±48.3和199.4±51.7μg(P = 0.002)。与对照组相比,PIFB组咳嗽时疼痛评分较低(1.45±1.43对3.00±1.71,P = 0.021),术后12小时静息时疼痛评分相似。两组不良事件发生率无差异。
PIFB缩短了心脏手术患者的拔管时间。
本试验于2021年11月4日在中国临床试验注册中心注册(ChiCTR2100052743)。