Suppr超能文献

流畅生成情绪词与言语测量相关,但与情绪调节、述情障碍或抑郁症状无关。

Fluency generating emotion words correlates with verbal measures but not emotion regulation, alexithymia, or depressive symptoms.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Northeastern University.

Department of Psychology, Columbia University.

出版信息

Emotion. 2023 Dec;23(8):2259-2269. doi: 10.1037/emo0001229. Epub 2023 Apr 6.

Abstract

How do you feel? To answer this question, one must first think of potential emotion words before choosing the best fit. However, we have little insight into how the ability to rapidly bring to mind emotion words-emotion fluency-relates to emotion functioning or general verbal abilities. In this study, we measured emotion fluency by counting how many emotion words participants could generate in 60 s. Participants ( = 151 in 2011-2012) also completed a behavioral measure of verbal fluency (i.e., how many words starting with "P" or "J" participants could produce in 60 s), a cognitive reappraisal emotion regulation task, and emotion functioning questionnaires. In preregistered analyses, we found that participants produced more negative emotion words than positive words and more positive words than neutral words in the emotion fluency task. As hypothesized, emotion fluency was positively related to verbal fluency, but contrary to hypotheses, emotion fluency was not related to self-reported or task-based emotion functioning (e.g., alexithymia, depression, and emotion regulation ability). As such, in community samples, emotion fluency may reflect general cognitive abilities rather than processes crucial to emotional well-being. While emotion fluency as measured here does not track indices of well-being, future research is needed to investigate potential contexts in which verbal fluency for emotion words may be key to emotion regulation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

你感觉如何?要回答这个问题,人们必须先想到潜在的情绪词汇,然后再选择最合适的词汇。然而,我们对快速联想到情绪词汇的能力(即情绪流畅性)与情绪功能或一般语言能力之间的关系知之甚少。在这项研究中,我们通过计算参与者在 60 秒内能够生成多少情绪词汇来衡量情绪流畅性。参与者(2011-2012 年有 151 人)还完成了言语流畅性的行为测量(即参与者在 60 秒内可以用“P”或“J”开头的单词生成多少个)、认知重评情绪调节任务和情绪功能问卷。在预先注册的分析中,我们发现参与者在情绪流畅性任务中生成的负面情绪词汇多于正面词汇,而生成的正面词汇又多于中性词汇。正如假设的那样,情绪流畅性与言语流畅性呈正相关,但与假设相反,情绪流畅性与自我报告或基于任务的情绪功能(如述情障碍、抑郁和情绪调节能力)无关。因此,在社区样本中,情绪流畅性可能反映了一般认知能力,而不是对情绪健康至关重要的过程。虽然这里测量的情绪流畅性不能追踪幸福感的指标,但需要进一步研究来调查言语流畅性对情绪词汇的潜在情况,这些情况可能是情绪调节的关键。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验