School of Psychology, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia.
Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical School, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstr. 30, Aachen 52074, Germany.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2013 Jul 12;3(3):372-387. doi: 10.3390/bs3030372. eCollection 2013 Sep.
The present study introduces "Emotional Verbal Fluency" as a novel (partially computerized) task, which is aimed to investigate the interaction between emotionally loaded words and executive functions. Verbal fluency tasks are thought to measure executive functions but the interaction with emotional aspects is hardly investigated. In the current study, a group of healthy subjects (n = 21, mean age 25 years, 76% females) were asked to generate items that are either part of a semantic category (e.g., plants, toys, vehicles; standard semantic verbal fluency) or can trigger the emotions joy, anger, sadness, fear and disgust. The results of the task revealed no differences between performance on semantic and emotional categories, suggesting a comparable task difficulty for healthy subjects. Hence, these first results on the comparison between semantic and emotional verbal fluency seem to highlight that both might be suitable for examining executive functioning. However, an interaction was found between the category type and repetition (first vs. second sequence of the same category) with larger performance decrease for semantic in comparison to emotional categories. Best performance overall was found for the emotional category "joy" suggesting a positivity bias in healthy subjects. To conclude, emotional verbal fluency is a promising approach to investigate emotional components in an executive task, which may stimulate further research, especially in psychiatric patients who suffer from emotional as well as cognitive deficits.
本研究介绍了“情感言语流畅性”作为一种新的(部分计算机化)任务,旨在研究情绪负载词与执行功能之间的相互作用。言语流畅性任务被认为可以测量执行功能,但很少研究与情绪方面的相互作用。在目前的研究中,一组健康受试者(n = 21,平均年龄 25 岁,女性占 76%)被要求生成属于语义类别(如植物、玩具、车辆;标准语义言语流畅性)的项目,或能引发快乐、愤怒、悲伤、恐惧和厌恶等情绪的项目。任务结果显示,在语义和情感类别上的表现没有差异,这表明健康受试者的任务难度相当。因此,这些关于语义和情感言语流畅性比较的初步结果似乎强调了两者都适合检查执行功能。然而,在类别类型和重复(同一类别中的第一个序列与第二个序列)之间发现了一种相互作用,与情感类别相比,语义类别的表现下降更大。对于健康受试者来说,整体表现最好的是情感类别“快乐”,这表明存在积极偏向。总之,情感言语流畅性是一种很有前途的方法,可以在执行任务中研究情感成分,这可能会刺激进一步的研究,特别是在患有情感和认知缺陷的精神病人中。