Suppr超能文献

述情障碍患者的言语和非言语情绪识别受损。

Impaired verbal and nonverbal emotion recognition in alexithymia.

作者信息

Lane R D, Sechrest L, Reidel R, Weldon V, Kaszniak A, Schwartz G E

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, USA.

出版信息

Psychosom Med. 1996 May-Jun;58(3):203-10. doi: 10.1097/00006842-199605000-00002.

Abstract

Although clinical observations suggest that alexithymic individuals have a deficit in their ability to recognize emotional stimuli and that this deficit is not simply due to a problem in verbal labeling, these two hypotheses have not been empirically confirmed. Three hundred eighty participants in a community survey without current or past histories of psychiatric disorder completed two independent measures of alexithymia [the Levels of Emotional Awareness Scale (LEAS) and the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20)] and the Perception of Affect Task (PAT), a 140-item measure of the ability to match emotion stimuli. The PAT includes four subtasks that require the subject to match verbal or nonverbal emotion stimuli with verbal or nonverbal emotion responses. The subtasks include matching sentences and words (verbal-verbal), faces and words (nonverbal-verbal), sentences and faces (verbal-nonverbal), and faces and photographs of scenes (nonverbal-nonverbal). Across the entire sample, higher (alexithymic) TAS-20 and lower LEAS scores were both correlated with lower accuracy rates on each of the subtasks of the PAT (p < .001), accounting for 10.5% and 18.4% of the variance, respectively. Fifty-one subjects met TAS-20 criteria for alexithymia. Alexithymic individuals scored lower than other subjects on purely nonverbal matching, purely verbal matching, and mixed verbal-nonverbal matching (all p < .001). These results suggest that alexithymia is associated with impaired verbal and nonverbal recognition of emotion stimuli and that the hallmark of alexithymia, a difficulty in putting emotion into words, may be a marker of a more general impairment in the capacity for emotion information processing.

摘要

尽管临床观察表明,述情障碍个体在识别情绪刺激方面存在能力缺陷,且这种缺陷并非仅仅源于语言标记问题,但这两种假设尚未得到实证证实。一项针对无当前或既往精神疾病史的社区调查中的380名参与者完成了两项独立的述情障碍测量[情绪意识水平量表(LEAS)和多伦多述情障碍量表(TAS - 20)]以及情感感知任务(PAT),这是一项用于测量匹配情绪刺激能力的140项指标。PAT包括四个子任务,要求受试者将言语或非言语情绪刺激与言语或非言语情绪反应进行匹配。这些子任务包括匹配句子和单词(言语 - 言语)、面部和单词(非言语 - 言语)、句子和面部(言语 - 非言语)以及面部和场景照片(非言语 - 非言语)。在整个样本中,较高的(述情障碍)TAS - 20得分和较低的LEAS得分均与PAT每个子任务的较低准确率相关(p < .001),分别解释了10.5%和18.4%的方差。51名受试者符合TAS - 20述情障碍标准。述情障碍个体在纯非言语匹配、纯言语匹配和言语 - 非言语混合匹配方面的得分均低于其他受试者(均p < .001)。这些结果表明,述情障碍与情绪刺激的言语和非言语识别受损有关,述情障碍的标志,即难以用言语表达情感,可能是情绪信息处理能力更普遍受损的一个标志。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验