Department of Special Education, Rehabilitation and Counseling, Auburn University.
Department of Counselor Education, University of Iowa.
Rehabil Psychol. 2023 May;68(2):194-203. doi: 10.1037/rep0000494. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the psychometric properties of a Multiple Disability Multidimensional Attitudes Scale Toward Persons with Disabilities (MD-MAS), focusing on four types of disabilities: anxiety disorder, autism spectrum disorder (ASD), blindness, and schizophrenia. We developed new vignettes describing the situation of interacting with an individual with each type of disability.
RESEARCH METHOD/DESIGN: We recruited 991 participants from a crowdsourcing data collection tool (i.e., Prolific). Participants were randomly assigned to one of four online surveys depending on the disability type. Five MAS models were selected from the previous literature to conduct confirmatory factor analyses (CFA).
CFA supported the German model of MAS with a four-factor structure (i.e., calm, negative affect, positive cognition, behavioral avoidance) as a good fit for the MD-MAS for four disability types. High internal consistency was found for four subscales across the disability types.
CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: This study modified the original MAS to assess attitudes toward persons with different types of disabilities. The adequate reliability and fit of the factor structure of the MD-MAS same across the four disability types allow researchers to compare attitudes based on disability types. This will provide significant implications for research and practice in understanding the nature of different attitudes by disability types. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
目的/目标:本研究旨在调查多发性残疾多维对残疾人态度量表(MD-MAS)的心理测量特性,重点关注四种残疾类型:焦虑障碍、自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)、失明和精神分裂症。我们开发了新的情景描述,描述了与每种残疾类型的个体互动的情况。
研究方法/设计:我们从众包数据收集工具(即 Prolific)中招募了 991 名参与者。参与者根据残疾类型随机分配到四个在线调查中的一个。从先前的文献中选择了五个 MAS 模型进行验证性因素分析(CFA)。
CFA 支持 MAS 的德国模型,该模型具有四因素结构(即平静、负面情绪、积极认知、行为回避),适用于四种残疾类型的 MD-MAS。四个子量表在残疾类型之间具有较高的内部一致性。
结论/意义:本研究修改了原始 MAS,以评估对不同类型残疾人士的态度。MD-MAS 的因子结构在四个残疾类型中的适当可靠性和拟合度允许研究人员根据残疾类型比较态度。这将为研究和实践提供重要意义,有助于理解不同残疾类型的态度本质。