Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2023 Jul;49(7):1176-1191. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001221. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
Phonological interference during written-word meaning judgments occurs in both Chinese and English, suggesting that word-level phonological activation is universal rather than dependent on the sublexical structures that vary with writing systems. To accommodate this universality, we distinguish two sources of phonological congruence between a meaning-bearing orthographic unit (word or character) and other units in the orthographic lexicon: (a) Global congruence between a word (or character) and its orthographic neighbors having the same pronunciation and (b) Local congruence between a word (or character) and its graphic constituents (letters or radicals). Recent evidence by Zhou and Perfetti in 2021 shows a greater role for global than local congruence in covert naming of Chinese characters. We hypothesize this is true also for meaning processing and use behavioral and event-related potential (ERP) measures to test this hypothesis during character meaning judgments. As expected, we found word-level phonological interference in meaning decision times. Further, ERPs detected interference effects related to global congruence at early and mid-latency ERP components; local congruence effects emerged only in interaction with global congruence. A late ERP component (LPC) also showed phonological interference, but no effect on mapping congruence. These time-course results suggest two phases of phonological activation: (a) character identification, influenced mainly by global congruence, as indicated in early and mid-latency ERP components and (b) meaning comparison, influenced only by lexical phonology, as indicated by the LPC component. The early phase of lexical processing is much the same whether meaning or pronunciation is required because it engages ortho-phonological associations that are not easily suppressed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
在书面词义判断中,语音干扰既存在于中文中,也存在于英文中,这表明词级别的语音激活是普遍存在的,而不是依赖于随书写系统而变化的次词汇结构。为了适应这种普遍性,我们区分了表意文字单位(单词或字符)与正字法词汇中其他单位之间的两种语音一致性来源:(a)具有相同发音的单词(或字符)与其正字法邻居之间的全局一致性,以及(b)单词(或字符)与其图形成分(字母或部首)之间的局部一致性。Zhou 和 Perfetti 在 2021 年的最新证据表明,在中文隐式命名中,全局一致性比局部一致性发挥更大的作用。我们假设这对于意义处理也是如此,并使用行为和事件相关电位(ERP)测量来在字符意义判断中检验这一假设。正如预期的那样,我们在意义决策时间中发现了词级别的语音干扰。此外,ERP 检测到与全局一致性相关的干扰效应在早期和中期潜伏期 ERP 成分中;局部一致性效应仅在与全局一致性相互作用时才会出现。晚期 ERP 成分(LPC)也显示出语音干扰,但对映射一致性没有影响。这些时程结果表明存在两个语音激活阶段:(a)字符识别,主要受全局一致性影响,如早期和中期潜伏期 ERP 成分所示,以及(b)意义比较,仅受词汇语音影响,如 LPC 成分所示。词汇处理的早期阶段与是否需要意义或发音非常相似,因为它涉及到不容易抑制的正字法-语音关联。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。