• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发并测试了一款针对考虑治疗焦虑或抑郁的癌症患者的患者决策辅助工具。

Development and user testing of a patient decision aid for cancer patients considering treatment for anxiety or depression.

机构信息

School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse Level 6 (North), C39Z, 2006, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Apr 6;23(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02146-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12911-023-02146-y
PMID:37024880
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10080801/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite high rates of mental health disorders among cancer patients, uptake of referral to psycho-oncology services remains low. This study aims to develop and seek clinician and patient feedback on a patient decision aid (PDA) for cancer patients making decisions about treatment for anxiety and/or depression.

METHODS

Development was informed by the International Patient Decision Aid Standards and the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. Psycho-oncology professionals provided feedback on the clinical accuracy, acceptability, and usability of a prototype PDA. Cognitive interviews with 21 cancer patients/survivors assessed comprehensibility, acceptability, and usefulness. Interviews were thematically analysed using Framework Analysis.

RESULTS

Clinicians and patients strongly endorsed the PDA. Clinicians suggested minor amendments to improve clarity and increase engagement. Patient feedback focused on clarifying the purpose of the PDA and improving the clarity of the values clarification exercises (VCEs).

CONCLUSIONS

The PDA, the first of its kind for psycho-oncology, was acceptable to clinicians and patients. Valuable feedback was obtained for the revision of the PDA and VCEs.

摘要

背景

尽管癌症患者的心理健康障碍发生率很高,但寻求心理肿瘤学服务的比例仍然很低。本研究旨在为癌症患者制定并寻求临床医生和患者对焦虑和/或抑郁治疗决策的患者决策辅助工具(PDA)的反馈。

方法

开发工作以国际患者决策辅助工具标准和渥太华决策支持框架为指导。心理肿瘤学专业人员对原型 PDA 的临床准确性、可接受性和可用性提供了反馈。对 21 名癌症患者/幸存者进行认知访谈,以评估其可理解性、可接受性和有用性。使用框架分析对访谈进行主题分析。

结果

临床医生和患者强烈支持 PDA。临床医生建议进行一些小的修改以提高清晰度并增加参与度。患者的反馈集中在澄清 PDA 的目的和提高价值观澄清练习(VCE)的清晰度上。

结论

该 PDA 是心理肿瘤学领域的首创,得到了临床医生和患者的认可。为 PDA 和 VCE 的修订获得了有价值的反馈。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6add/10080801/ee1af92cf68a/12911_2023_2146_Figb_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6add/10080801/f321dbc2d3d5/12911_2023_2146_Figa_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6add/10080801/ee1af92cf68a/12911_2023_2146_Figb_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6add/10080801/f321dbc2d3d5/12911_2023_2146_Figa_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6add/10080801/ee1af92cf68a/12911_2023_2146_Figb_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and user testing of a patient decision aid for cancer patients considering treatment for anxiety or depression.开发并测试了一款针对考虑治疗焦虑或抑郁的癌症患者的患者决策辅助工具。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Apr 6;23(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02146-y.
2
Development and Acceptability of a Patient Decision Aid for Pain Management in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: The JIA Option Map.《青少年特发性关节炎患者疼痛管理决策辅助工具的制定与可接受性研究:JIA 选择图》。
Patient. 2020 Dec;13(6):719-728. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00458-z. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
3
Development of a patient decision aid for treatment resistant depression.治疗抵抗性抑郁症患者决策辅助工具的开发。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Oct 1;275:299-306. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.07.014. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
4
Development and validation of a patient decision aid for prostate Cancer therapy: from paternalistic towards participative shared decision making.开发和验证前列腺癌治疗患者决策辅助工具:从家长式决策向参与式共享决策转变。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Jul 11;19(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0862-4.
5
A Decision Aid for Patients Considering Surgery for Sciatica: Codesign and User-Testing With Patients and Clinicians.《用于考虑手术治疗坐骨神经痛的患者的决策辅助工具:与患者和临床医生共同设计和用户测试》。
Health Expect. 2024 Jun;27(3):e14111. doi: 10.1111/hex.14111.
6
Decision Aid for Nutrition Support in Pediatric Oncology: A Pilot Study.儿科肿瘤营养支持决策辅助工具:一项试点研究。
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2017 Nov;41(8):1336-1347. doi: 10.1177/0148607116661840. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
7
Development and randomised controlled trial of a Continence Product Patient Decision Aid for men postradical prostatectomy.开发并随机对照试验一种用于前列腺癌根治术后男性的控尿产品患者决策辅助工具。
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Jul;29(13-14):2251-2259. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15223. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
8
The development of a patient decision aid to reduce decisional conflict about antidepressant use in pregnancy.开发一种患者决策辅助工具,以减少关于在怀孕期间使用抗抑郁药的决策冲突。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 May 13;22(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01870-1.
9
Decision aid prototype development for parents considering adenotonsillectomy for their children with sleep disordered breathing.为考虑对患有睡眠呼吸障碍的孩子进行腺样体扁桃体切除术的家长开发决策辅助原型。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Nov 4;45(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s40463-016-0170-2.
10
High Users of Healthcare Services: Development and Alpha Testing of a Patient Decision Aid for Case Management.高医疗服务使用者:病例管理患者决策辅助工具的开发和α测试。
Patient. 2020 Dec;13(6):757-766. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00465-0. Epub 2020 Oct 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of a Digital Decision Aid When Choosing Between Face-to-Face and Guided Internet-Based Psychological Interventions for Depression Among Chinese-Speaking Participants in Hong Kong: Randomized Controlled Trial.数字决策辅助工具对香港讲中文参与者在面对面与基于互联网引导的抑郁症心理干预之间进行选择时的影响:随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 6;27:e54727. doi: 10.2196/54727.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence of cognitive impairment following chemotherapy treatment for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.化疗治疗乳腺癌后认知障碍的患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 8;12(1):2135. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05682-1.
2
Clarifying Values: An Updated and Expanded Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.澄清价值观:一项更新和扩展的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Med Decis Making. 2021 Oct;41(7):801-820. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211037946.
3
20th Anniversary Ottawa Decision Support Framework: Part 3 Overview of Systematic Reviews and Updated Framework.
第 20 届渥太华决策支持框架周年纪念:第 3 部分 系统评价概述和更新框架。
Med Decis Making. 2020 Apr;40(3):379-398. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20911870.
4
Suicidal ideation in patients with cancer: A systematic review of prevalence, risk factors, intervention and assessment.癌症患者的自杀意念:患病率、风险因素、干预和评估的系统评价。
Palliat Support Care. 2020 Apr;18(2):206-219. doi: 10.1017/S1478951519000610.
5
Barriers to psychosocial oncology service utilization in patients newly diagnosed with head and neck cancer.头颈部癌症新诊断患者心理社会肿瘤学服务利用的障碍。
Psychooncology. 2018 Dec;27(12):2786-2793. doi: 10.1002/pon.4889. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
6
Use of Antidepressant Medications Moderates the Relationship Between Depressive Symptoms and Hospital Length of Stay in Patients with Advanced Cancer.抗抑郁药物的使用调节了晚期癌症患者抑郁症状与住院时间之间的关系。
Oncologist. 2019 Jan;24(1):117-124. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0096. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
7
Development and pilot of a decision-aid for patients with bipolar II disorder and their families making decisions about treatment options to prevent relapse.开发并试行用于双相情感障碍 II 型患者及其家属的决策辅助工具,帮助他们针对预防复发选择治疗方案。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 10;13(7):e0200490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200490. eCollection 2018.
8
Development and pilot testing of a Decision Aid (DA) for women with early-stage breast cancer considering contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.早期乳腺癌女性考虑行对侧预防性乳房切除术的决策辅助工具(DA)的开发和初步测试。
Breast. 2018 Aug;40:156-164. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2018.05.009. Epub 2018 May 22.
9
Antidepressants for the treatment of depression in people with cancer.用于治疗癌症患者抑郁症的抗抑郁药。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 23;4(4):CD011006. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011006.pub3.
10
Seeking, accepting and declining help for emotional distress in cancer: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence.癌症患者在情绪困扰时寻求、接受和拒绝帮助的情况:定性证据的系统评价与主题综合分析
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2018 Mar;27(2):e12720. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12720. Epub 2017 Jun 8.