• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

晚期肝细胞癌一线全身治疗的疗效与安全性:一项针对标志性III期试验的网状Meta分析

Efficacy and safety of frontline systemic therapy for advanced HCC: A network meta-analysis of landmark phase III trials.

作者信息

Fulgenzi Claudia Angela Maria, Scheiner Bernhard, Korolewicz James, Stikas Charalampos-Vlasios, Gennari Alessandra, Vincenzi Bruno, Openshaw Mark R, Silletta Marianna, Pinter Matthias, Cortellini Alessio, Scotti Lorenza, D'Alessio Antonio, Pinato David J

机构信息

Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.

Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

JHEP Rep. 2023 Feb 18;5(5):100702. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100702. eCollection 2023 May.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100702
PMID:37025943
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10070142/
Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Direct comparisons across first-line regimens for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma are not available. We performed a network metanalysis of phase III of trials to compare first-line systemic treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma in terms of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, disease control rate, and incidence of adverse events (AEs).

METHODS

After performing a literature review from January 2008 to September 2022, we screened 6,329 studies and reviewed 3,009 studies, leading to identification of 15 phase III trials for analysis. We extracted odds ratios for objective response rate and disease control rate, relative risks for AEs, and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs for OS and PFS, and used a frequentist network metanalysis, with fixed-effect multivariable meta-regression models to estimate the indirect pooled HRs, odds ratios, relative risks, and corresponding 95% CIs, considering sorafenib as reference.

RESULTS

Of 10,820 included patients, 10,444 received active treatment and 376 placebo. Sintilimab + IBI350, camrelizumab + rivoceranib, and atezolizumab + bevacizumab provided the greatest reduction in the risk of death compared with sorafenib, with HRs of 0.57 (95% CI 0.43-0.75), 0.62 (95% CI 0.49-0.79), and 0.66 (95% CI 0.52-0.84), respectively. Considering PFS, camrelizumab + rivoceranib and pembrolizumab + lenvatinib were associated with the greatest reduction in the risk of PFS events compared with sorafenib, with HRs of 0.52 (95% CI 0.41-0.65) and 0.52 (95% CI 0.35-0.77), respectively. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapies carried the lowest risk for all-grade and grade ≥3 AEs.

CONCLUSIONS

The combinations of ICI + anti-vascular endothelial growth factor, and double ICIs lead to the greatest OS benefit compared with sorafenib, whereas ICI + kinase inhibitor regimens are associated with greater PFS benefit at the cost of higher toxicity rates.

IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS

In the last few years, many different therapies have been studied for patients with primary liver cancer that cannot be treated with surgery. In these cases, anticancer drugs (alone or in combination) are given with the intent to keep the cancer at bay and, ultimately, to prolong survival. Among all the therapies that have been investigated, the combination of immunotherapy (drugs that boost the immune system against the cancer) and anti-angiogenic agents (drugs that act on tumoural vessels) has appeared the best to improve survival. Similarly, the combination of two types of immunotherapies that activate the immune system at different levels has also shown positive results.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42022366330.

摘要

背景与目的

目前尚无针对晚期肝细胞癌一线治疗方案的直接比较。我们对III期试验进行了网状荟萃分析,以比较肝细胞癌一线全身治疗在总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)、客观缓解率、疾病控制率和不良事件(AE)发生率方面的差异。

方法

在对2008年1月至2022年9月的文献进行回顾后,我们筛选了6329项研究并审查了3009项研究,最终确定了15项III期试验进行分析。我们提取了客观缓解率和疾病控制率的比值比、AE的相对风险以及OS和PFS的风险比(HRs)及其95%置信区间(CIs),并使用频率学派网状荟萃分析,采用固定效应多变量Meta回归模型来估计间接合并HRs、比值比、相对风险以及相应的95% CIs,以索拉非尼作为对照。

结果

在纳入的10820例患者中,10444例接受了积极治疗,376例接受了安慰剂治疗。与索拉非尼相比,信迪利单抗+IBI350、卡瑞利珠单抗+瑞戈非尼以及阿替利珠单抗+贝伐单抗降低死亡风险的效果最为显著,HRs分别为0.57(95% CI 0.43 - 0.75)、0.62(95% CI 0.49 - 0.79)和0.66(95% CI 0.52 - 0.84)。考虑PFS时,与索拉非尼相比,卡瑞利珠单抗+瑞戈非尼以及帕博利珠单抗+仑伐替尼降低PFS事件风险的效果最为显著,HRs分别为0.52(95% CI 0.41 - 0.65)和0.52(95% CI 0.35 - 0.77)。免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)单药治疗的所有级别和≥3级AE风险最低。

结论

与索拉非尼相比,ICI + 抗血管内皮生长因子以及双联ICI联合方案带来的OS获益最大,而ICI + 激酶抑制剂方案虽与更大的PFS获益相关,但毒性发生率更高。

影响与意义

在过去几年中,针对无法手术治疗的原发性肝癌患者研究了许多不同的治疗方法。在这些情况下,给予抗癌药物(单独或联合使用)旨在控制癌症并最终延长生存期。在所有已研究的治疗方法中,免疫疗法(增强免疫系统对抗癌症的药物)和抗血管生成药物(作用于肿瘤血管的药物)联合使用似乎最有利于提高生存期。同样,在不同水平激活免疫系统的两种免疫疗法联合使用也显示出了积极的效果。

系统评价注册

PROSPERO CRD42022366330

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfcf/10070142/710fd45b7f2c/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfcf/10070142/710fd45b7f2c/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfcf/10070142/710fd45b7f2c/ga1.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy and safety of frontline systemic therapy for advanced HCC: A network meta-analysis of landmark phase III trials.晚期肝细胞癌一线全身治疗的疗效与安全性:一项针对标志性III期试验的网状Meta分析
JHEP Rep. 2023 Feb 18;5(5):100702. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100702. eCollection 2023 May.
2
Single or combined immune checkpoint inhibitors compared to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for people with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.比较单药或联合免疫检查点抑制剂与含或不含贝伐珠单抗的一线含铂化疗方案用于晚期非小细胞肺癌患者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 14;12(12):CD013257. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013257.pub2.
3
The emerging therapies are reshaping the first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.新兴疗法正在重塑晚期肝细胞癌的一线治疗:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2024 Apr 20;17:17562848241237631. doi: 10.1177/17562848241237631. eCollection 2024.
4
Single or combined immune checkpoint inhibitors compared to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for people with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.比较单药或联合免疫检查点抑制剂与一线含或不含贝伐珠单抗的铂类化疗方案用于晚期非小细胞肺癌患者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 30;4(4):CD013257. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013257.pub3.
5
Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with or without PD-L1 selection: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.免疫检查点抑制剂治疗有无 PD-L1 选择的晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效和安全性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2023 Sep 20;136(18):2156-2165. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002750. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
6
Selection of first-line systemic therapies for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.一线系统治疗晚期肝细胞癌的选择:一项随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2021 May 21;27(19):2415-2433. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i19.2415.
7
Comparative efficacy of novel combination strategies for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A network metanalysis of phase III trials.比较不可切除肝细胞癌新型联合治疗策略的疗效:III 期试验的网络荟萃分析。
Eur J Cancer. 2022 Oct;174:57-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.06.058. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
8
Balancing Efficacy and Tolerability of First-Line Systemic Therapies for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Network Meta-Analysis.晚期肝细胞癌一线全身治疗的疗效与耐受性平衡:一项网状Meta分析
Liver Cancer. 2023 Jul 25;13(2):169-180. doi: 10.1159/000531744. eCollection 2024 Apr.
9
Immune checkpoint inhibitors chemotherapy as second-line therapy for advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.免疫检查点抑制剂联合化疗作为晚期食管鳞状细胞癌的二线治疗:一项系统评价和经济学评估
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2024 Feb 28;17:17562848241233134. doi: 10.1177/17562848241233134. eCollection 2024.
10
The evolution of immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma - A systematic review.免疫检查点抑制剂联合治疗晚期肝细胞癌的研究进展——系统综述。
Cancer Treat Rev. 2023 Jul;118:102584. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102584. Epub 2023 May 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of triglyceride-glucose index with long-term prognosis in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving immunotherapy and targeted therapy.甘油三酯-葡萄糖指数与接受免疫治疗和靶向治疗的晚期肝细胞癌患者长期预后的关联
World J Gastroenterol. 2025 Aug 14;31(30):109863. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i30.109863.
2
Integrating Quality of Life and Survival in Systemic Therapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Network Meta-Analysis.晚期肝细胞癌系统治疗中生活质量与生存的整合:一项网状Meta分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2025 Aug 14. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.2470.
3
Updated Network Meta-Analysis of First-Line Systemic Treatments for Advanced HCC: Consistent Role of TACE.

本文引用的文献

1
Tremelimumab plus Durvalumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.特瑞利木单抗联合度伐利尤单抗治疗不可切除肝细胞癌。
NEJM Evid. 2022 Aug;1(8):EVIDoa2100070. doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2100070. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
2
COSMIC-312: mounting immunotherapy enigmas for hepatocellular carcinoma.COSMIC-312:肝细胞癌不断增加的免疫治疗谜团
Lancet Oncol. 2022 Oct;23(10):e441. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00497-1.
3
Comparative efficacy of novel combination strategies for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A network metanalysis of phase III trials.
晚期肝癌一线全身治疗的更新网络荟萃分析:经动脉化疗栓塞术的持续作用
Liver Cancer. 2025 Jun 12. doi: 10.1159/000546697.
4
Matching-adjusted indirect comparison of tislelizumab plus lenvatinib versus sintilimab plus bevacizumab biosimilar as first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.替雷利珠单抗联合乐伐替尼与信迪利单抗联合贝伐珠单抗生物类似药作为不可切除肝细胞癌一线治疗的匹配调整间接比较
Front Immunol. 2025 Jun 23;16:1594935. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1594935. eCollection 2025.
5
The safety and effectiveness of sintilimab versus camrelizumab, both plus targeted drugs, in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.在晚期肝细胞癌中,信迪利单抗与卡瑞利珠单抗联合靶向药物的安全性和有效性比较。
Front Immunol. 2025 Jun 23;16:1585956. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1585956. eCollection 2025.
6
Liver function dynamics in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody/tyrosine kinase inhibitors with or without transarterial chemoembolization.接受免疫检查点抑制剂和抗血管内皮生长因子抗体/酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗(无论是否联合经动脉化疗栓塞)的晚期肝细胞癌患者的肝功能动态变化
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2025 Jun 30;17:17588359251347363. doi: 10.1177/17588359251347363. eCollection 2025.
7
SNX17 mediates STAT3 activation to promote hepatocellular carcinoma progression via a retromer dependent mechanism.分选连接蛋白17(SNX17)通过一种依赖于retromer的机制介导信号转导和转录激活因子3(STAT3)的激活,从而促进肝细胞癌进展。
Int J Biol Sci. 2025 Mar 31;21(6):2762-2779. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.110506. eCollection 2025.
8
Enhancement of apoptosis in HCT116 and HepG2 cells by var. seed extract in combination with sorafenib.变种种子提取物与索拉非尼联合使用增强HCT116和HepG2细胞的凋亡。
Chin Herb Med. 2025 Feb 21;17(2):322-339. doi: 10.1016/j.chmed.2025.02.005. eCollection 2025 Apr.
9
Comparison of efficacy and safety of adjuvant therapies versus sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.肝细胞癌辅助治疗与索拉非尼的疗效和安全性比较:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Mar 3;16:1502931. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1502931. eCollection 2025.
10
Five-year complete remission of super-giant hepatocellular carcinoma with hepatectomy followed by sorafenib plus camrelizumab: A case report.肝癌切除术后索拉非尼联合卡瑞利珠单抗治疗超巨大肝细胞癌五年完全缓解:一例报告
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Jan 27;17(1):99752. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i1.99752.
比较不可切除肝细胞癌新型联合治疗策略的疗效:III 期试验的网络荟萃分析。
Eur J Cancer. 2022 Oct;174:57-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.06.058. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
4
Log-Rank Test vs MaxCombo and Difference in Restricted Mean Survival Time Tests for Comparing Survival Under Nonproportional Hazards in Immuno-oncology Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.对数秩检验与最大连续检验和受限平均生存时间检验在免疫肿瘤学试验中非比例风险下生存比较的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2022 Sep 1;8(9):1294-1300. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.2666.
5
Cabozantinib plus atezolizumab versus sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (COSMIC-312): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.卡博替尼联合阿替利珠单抗与索拉非尼治疗晚期肝细胞癌(COSMIC-312):一项多中心、开放标签、随机、III 期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2022 Aug;23(8):995-1008. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00326-6. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
6
Molecular correlates of clinical response and resistance to atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.晚期肝细胞癌中阿替利珠单抗联合贝伐珠单抗治疗的临床反应和耐药的分子相关性。
Nat Med. 2022 Aug;28(8):1599-1611. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01868-2. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
7
CXCR2 inhibition enables NASH-HCC immunotherapy.CXCR2抑制可实现非酒精性脂肪性肝炎相关肝癌的免疫治疗。
Gut. 2022 Apr 27;71(10):2093-106. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-326259.
8
Nivolumab versus sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (CheckMate 459): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial.纳武利尤单抗对比索拉非尼用于治疗晚期肝细胞癌(CheckMate 459):一项随机、多中心、开放标签、III 期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2022 Jan;23(1):77-90. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00604-5. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
9
Updated efficacy and safety data from IMbrave150: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab vs. sorafenib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.IMbrave150研究的更新疗效和安全性数据:阿替利珠单抗联合贝伐珠单抗对比索拉非尼治疗不可切除肝细胞癌。
J Hepatol. 2022 Apr;76(4):862-873. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.11.030. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
10
BCLC strategy for prognosis prediction and treatment recommendation: The 2022 update.BCLC 策略用于预后预测和治疗推荐:2022 年更新版。
J Hepatol. 2022 Mar;76(3):681-693. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.11.018. Epub 2021 Nov 19.