EnviSci Consulting, LLC, 5900 Balcones Dr, Suite 100, Austin, TX 78731, United States.
Center for Natural Resources, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, 323 MLK Blvd., Newark, NJ, United States.
Aquat Toxicol. 2023 Jun;259:106518. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2023.106518. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
Laboratory preparation of aqueous test media is a critical step in developing toxicity information needed for oil spill response decision-making. Multiple methods have been used to prepare physically and chemically dispersed oils which influence test outcome, interpretation, and utility for hazard assessment and modeling. This paper aims to review media preparation strategies, highlight advantages and limitations, provide recommendations for improvement, and promote the standardization of methods to better inform assessment and modeling. A benefit of media preparation methods for oil that rely on low to moderate mixing energy coupled with a variable dilution design is that the dissolved oil composition of the water accommodation fraction (WAF) stock is consistent across diluted treatments. Further, analyses that support exposure confirmation maybe reduced and reflect dissolved oil exposures that are bioavailable and amenable to toxicity modeling. Variable loading tests provide a range of dissolved oil compositions that require analytical verification at each oil loading. Regardless of test design, a preliminary study is recommended to optimize WAF mixing and settling times to achieve equilibrium between oil and test media. Variable dilution tests involving chemical dispersants (CEWAF) or high energy mixing (HEWAF) can increase dissolved oil exposures in treatment dilutions due to droplet dissolution when compared to WAFs. In contrast, HEWAF/CEWAFs generated using variable oil loadings are expected to provide dissolved oil exposures more comparable to WAFs. Preparation methods that provide droplet oil exposures should be environmentally relevant and informed by oil droplet concentrations, compositions, sizes, and exposure durations characteristic of field spill scenarios. Oil droplet generators and passive dosing techniques offer advantages for delivering controlled constant or dynamic dissolved exposures and larger volumes of test media for toxicity testing. Adoption of proposed guidance for improving media preparation methods will provide greater comparability and utility of toxicity testing in oil spill response and assessment.
实验室制备水相测试介质是开发溢油应急决策所需毒性信息的关键步骤。已经使用了多种方法来制备物理和化学分散的油,这些方法会影响测试结果、解释和用于危害评估和建模的实用性。本文旨在综述介质制备策略,突出优缺点,提出改进建议,并促进方法标准化,以便更好地为评估和建模提供信息。
对于依赖低至中等混合能量并结合可变稀释设计的油的介质制备方法,水容纳分数 (WAF) 储备中溶解油的组成在稀释处理中是一致的,这是一个优点。此外,支持暴露确认的分析可能会减少,并反映出可生物利用且适合毒性建模的溶解油暴露。可变负荷测试提供了一系列溶解油组成,需要在每个油负荷下进行分析验证。
无论测试设计如何,都建议进行初步研究以优化 WAF 混合和沉降时间,以实现油与测试介质之间的平衡。与 WAF 相比,涉及化学分散剂 (CEWAF) 或高能混合 (HEWAF) 的可变稀释测试由于液滴溶解,可能会增加处理稀释液中的溶解油暴露。相比之下,由于采用可变油负荷生成的 HEWAF/CEWAF 预计会提供更类似于 WAF 的溶解油暴露。
提供液滴油暴露的制备方法应该是环境相关的,并根据现场溢油场景中油滴浓度、组成、大小和暴露时间的特征进行信息告知。油滴生成器和被动给药技术为提供受控的恒定或动态溶解暴露以及用于毒性测试的更大体积的测试介质提供了优势。
采用改进介质制备方法的建议指南将提高溢油应急和评估中毒性测试的可比性和实用性。