Suppr超能文献

肩胛带松动术治疗肩峰下撞击综合征的疗效:一项随机对照试验。

Effectiveness of scapular mobilization in people with subacromial impingement syndrome: A randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Escuela de Fisioterapia, Universidad de las Américas, Quito 170504, Ecuador.

Physical Therapy Department, Clinica las Condes, Santiago, Chile.

出版信息

Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2023 Jun;66(5):101744. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2023.101744. Epub 2023 Apr 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Scapular mobilization is a manual therapy technique widely used in the management of musculoskeletal disorders of the shoulder.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of scapular mobilization in addition to an exercise program in people with subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS).

METHODS

Seventy-two adults with SIS were randomly allocated to 1 of 2 groups. The control group (n=36) participated in a 6-week exercise program, and the intervention group (n = 36) participated in the same exercise program plus passive manual scapular mobilization. Both groups were assessed at baseline and 6 weeks (end of treatment). The primary outcome measure was upper limb function assessed using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. Secondary outcome measures were the Constant-Murley questionnaire, pain (visual analog scale [VAS]), and scapular upward rotation.

RESULTS

All participants completed the trial. The between-group difference in DASH was -1.1 points (Cohen d = 0.05; p = 0.911), Constant-Murley 2.1 points (Cohen d = 0.08; p = 0.841), VAS rating of pain at rest -0.1 cm (Cohen d = 0.05; p = 0.684), and VAS rating of pain during movement -0.2 cm (Cohen d = 0.09; p = 0.764); scapular upward rotation at rest (arm by the side) was 0.6° (Cohen d = 0.09; p = 0.237), at 45° shoulder abduction was 0.8° (Cohen d = 0.13; p = 0.096), at 90° was 0.1° (Cohen d = 0.04; p = 0.783), and at 135° was 0.1° (Cohen d = 0.07; p = 0.886). Most differences were in favor of the intervention group; however, the effect sizes were weak and not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

In the short-term, the addition of scapular mobilization did not provide significant clinical benefits in terms of function, pain or scapular motion in participants with SIS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Brazilian registry of clinical trials UTN number U1111-1226-2081. Registered February 25, 2019.

摘要

背景

肩胛松动术是一种广泛应用于肩部肌肉骨骼疾病治疗的手法治疗技术。

目的

确定肩胛松动术在肩峰下撞击综合征(SIS)患者的运动方案之外的效果。

方法

72 名 SIS 成年人被随机分配到 2 组中的 1 组。对照组(n=36)参加了 6 周的运动方案,干预组(n=36)参加了相同的运动方案外加被动手法肩胛松动术。两组均在基线和 6 周(治疗结束时)进行评估。主要结局指标是使用上肢功能残疾问卷(DASH)评估上肢功能。次要结局指标是Constant-Murley 问卷、疼痛(视觉模拟评分 [VAS])和肩胛上提。

结果

所有参与者均完成了试验。DASH 组间差异为-1.1 分(Cohen d=0.05;p=0.911),Constant-Murley 为 2.1 分(Cohen d=0.08;p=0.841),休息时 VAS 疼痛评分-0.1cm(Cohen d=0.05;p=0.684),运动时 VAS 疼痛评分-0.2cm(Cohen d=0.09;p=0.764);肩胛在休息时(手臂放在身旁)上提 0.6°(Cohen d=0.09;p=0.237),在 45°肩外展时上提 0.8°(Cohen d=0.13;p=0.096),在 90°时上提 0.1°(Cohen d=0.04;p=0.783),在 135°时上提 0.1°(Cohen d=0.07;p=0.886)。大多数差异都有利于干预组;然而,效应量较小且无统计学意义。

结论

在短期内,在 SIS 患者的运动方案中加入肩胛松动术并不能在功能、疼痛或肩胛运动方面提供显著的临床益处。

试验注册

巴西临床试验注册处 U1111-1226-2081 号。2019 年 2 月 25 日注册。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验