Zheng Wei, Cai Dong-Bin, Nie Sha, Chen Jian-Hua, Huang Xing-Bing, Goerigk Stephan, Brunoni Andre Russowsky, Zheng Wei
Xiamen Xian Yue Hospital, Xiamen, China.
Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 22;14:1154354. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1154354. eCollection 2023.
We performed a meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, controlled trials (RCTs) to systematically investigate the therapeutic effects and tolerability of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) for the treatment of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD).
Electronic search of PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang database, and the Cochrane Library up to 1 April 2022. Double-blind RCTs examining the efficacy and safety of tACS for patients with MDD were included. The primary outcome was the improvement of depressive symptoms following a course of tACS treatment. Data were analyzed using Review Manager Version 5.3 (Cochrane IMS, Oxford, UK). Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias and Jadad scale. Publication bias was assessed using a funnel plot and the Egger test.
We identified 883 articles, of which 4 RCTs with 5 active treatment arms covering 224 participants with MDD on active tACS ( = 117) and sham tACS ( = 107) were eligible for inclusion. Meta-analysis of depressive symptoms at post-tACS found an advantage of active tACS over sham tACS ( = 212, standard mean difference (SMD) = -1.14, 95% confidence interval (CI): -2.23, -0.06; = 90%, = 0.04). The significant superiority of active tACS over sham tACS in improving depressive symptoms remained in a sensitivity analysis. Active tACS was significantly superior to sham tACS regarding depressive symptoms at the 4 week follow-up (SMD = -1.07, 95% CI: -2.05, -0.08; = 88%, = 0.03) and study-defined remission [risk ratio (RR) = 2.07, 95% CI: 1.36, 3.14, = 9%, = 0.0006]. The discontinuation rate due to any reason was similar between the two groups ( > 0.05). All included studies were rated as high quality (Jadad score ≥ 3), with funnel plots of primary outcome not suggestive of publication bias.
tACS appeared to be modestly effective and safe for improving depressive symptoms in patients with MDD, although further studies are warranted.
我们进行了一项随机、双盲、对照试验(RCT)的荟萃分析,以系统研究经颅交流电刺激(tACS)治疗重度抑郁症(MDD)患者的疗效和耐受性。
截至2022年4月1日,对PubMed、PsycINFO、EMBASE、中国知网、万方数据库和Cochrane图书馆进行电子检索。纳入了检验tACS对MDD患者疗效和安全性的双盲RCT。主要结局是tACS治疗一个疗程后抑郁症状的改善情况。使用Review Manager 5.3版(英国牛津Cochrane IMS)分析数据。使用Cochrane偏倚风险和Jadad量表评估研究质量。使用漏斗图和Egger检验评估发表偏倚。
我们识别出883篇文章,其中4项RCT,有5个活性治疗组,涵盖224例接受活性tACS(n = 117)和假tACS(n = 107)治疗的MDD患者,符合纳入标准。tACS治疗后抑郁症状的荟萃分析发现,活性tACS优于假tACS(n = 212,标准均差(SMD)= -1.14,95%置信区间(CI):-2.23,-0.06;I² = 90%,P = 0.04)。在敏感性分析中,活性tACS在改善抑郁症状方面仍显著优于假tACS。在4周随访时,活性tACS在抑郁症状方面显著优于假tACS(SMD = -1.07,95% CI:-2.05,-0.08;I² = 88%,P = 0.03),且在研究定义的缓解方面(风险比(RR)= 2.07,95% CI:1.36,3.14,I² = 9%,P = 0.0006)。两组因任何原因的停药率相似(P > 0.05)。所有纳入研究均被评为高质量(Jadad评分≥3),主要结局的漏斗图未提示存在发表偏倚。
tACS似乎对改善MDD患者的抑郁症状有一定疗效且安全,尽管仍需进一步研究。