Afzal Muhammad Sohaib, Atunde Folajimi J, Yousaf Rao Ahmed, Ali Shahid, Nasir Namra, Medarametla Gnana Deepthi, Muhammad Nazar, Amin Adil
Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, USA.
Neurology, NES Healthcare, Aylesbury, GBR.
Cureus. 2023 Mar 6;15(3):e35843. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35843. eCollection 2023 Mar.
The present network meta-analysis was conducted to compare typical and atypical antipsychotics for the management of intensive care unit (ICU) delirium. The present meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Two investigators systematically searched electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, for relevant studies in English from inception to February 15, 2023. The key terms used to search for relevant articles included "antipsychotic," "delirium," "randomized-controlled trials," and "efficacy." We used the term "randomized controlled trials (RCTs)" to limit the search to RCTs. The primary outcome was the duration of delirium in days. There were three predefined secondary outcomes included: mortality in 30 days, duration of mechanical ventilation in days, and length of ICU stay in days. A total of seven studies were included in the present meta-analysis. No significant difference was found between typical anti-psychotic, atypical anti-psychotic, and placebo in terms of duration of delirium, rate of mortality, duration of ICU stay, and duration of mechanical ventilation. In conclusion, this network meta-analysis comparing typical antipsychotic, atypical antipsychotic medications, and placebo on delirium in patients in the ICU did not find evidence that either typical or atypical antipsychotic medications led to a shorter duration of delirium. Patients who received treatment with typical or atypical antipsychotics and those who received a placebo had similar clinical outcomes, including mortality, length of stay in the ICU, and duration of ventilation.
本网络荟萃分析旨在比较典型抗精神病药物和非典型抗精神病药物用于治疗重症监护病房(ICU)谵妄的效果。本荟萃分析按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行。两名研究人员系统检索了电子数据库,包括PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆,以查找从创刊至2023年2月15日的英文相关研究。用于检索相关文章的关键词包括“抗精神病药物”“谵妄”“随机对照试验”和“疗效”。我们使用“随机对照试验(RCTs)”一词将搜索范围限制在随机对照试验。主要结局是谵妄持续天数。预先设定的次要结局有三项,包括30天死亡率、机械通气天数和ICU住院天数。本荟萃分析共纳入七项研究。在谵妄持续时间、死亡率、ICU住院时间和机械通气时间方面,典型抗精神病药物、非典型抗精神病药物和安慰剂之间未发现显著差异。总之,这项比较典型抗精神病药物、非典型抗精神病药物和安慰剂对ICU患者谵妄影响的网络荟萃分析未发现证据表明典型或非典型抗精神病药物能缩短谵妄持续时间。接受典型或非典型抗精神病药物治疗的患者与接受安慰剂治疗的患者有相似的临床结局,包括死亡率、ICU住院时间和通气时间。