• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

L3幼虫子宫细胞中胞质和跨膜绿色荧光蛋白报告基因的差异产生率。

Differential production rates of cytosolic and transmembrane GFP reporters in L3 larval uterine cells.

作者信息

Kenny-Ganzert Isabel, Chi Qiuyi, Sherwood David

机构信息

Department of Biology, Duke University.

出版信息

MicroPubl Biol. 2023 Mar 21;2023. doi: 10.17912/micropub.biology.000813. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.17912/micropub.biology.000813
PMID:37033704
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10074172/
Abstract

Transgene driven protein expression is an important tool for investigating developmental mechanisms in . Here, we have assessed protein production rates and levels in L3 larval uterine cells (UCs). Using ubiquitous promoter driven cytosolic and transmembrane tethered GFP, fluorescence recovery after photobleaching, and quantitative fluorescence analysis, we reveal that cytosolic GFP is produced at an ~two-fold higher rate than transmembrane tethered GFP and accumulates at ~five-fold higher levels in UCs. We also provide evidence that cytosolic GFP in the anchor cell, a specialized UC that mediates uterine-vulval connection, is more rapidly degraded through an autophagy-independent mechanism.

摘要

转基因驱动的蛋白质表达是研究发育机制的重要工具。在此,我们评估了L3幼虫子宫细胞(UCs)中的蛋白质产生速率和水平。通过使用普遍启动子驱动的胞质和跨膜连接的绿色荧光蛋白(GFP)、光漂白后的荧光恢复以及定量荧光分析,我们发现胞质GFP的产生速率比跨膜连接的GFP高约两倍,并且在UCs中的积累水平高约五倍。我们还提供证据表明,在介导子宫 - 外阴连接的特殊UC——锚定细胞中的胞质GFP,通过一种不依赖自噬的机制被更快地降解。

相似文献

1
Differential production rates of cytosolic and transmembrane GFP reporters in L3 larval uterine cells.L3幼虫子宫细胞中胞质和跨膜绿色荧光蛋白报告基因的差异产生率。
MicroPubl Biol. 2023 Mar 21;2023. doi: 10.17912/micropub.biology.000813. eCollection 2023.
2
Visualization of C. elegans transgenic arrays by GFP.通过绿色荧光蛋白(GFP)对秀丽隐杆线虫转基因阵列进行可视化。
BMC Genet. 2006 Jun 7;7:36. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-7-36.
3
Reciprocal EGF signaling back to the uterus from the induced C. elegans vulva coordinates morphogenesis of epithelia.从诱导产生的秀丽隐杆线虫阴门向子宫的反向表皮生长因子(EGF)信号传导协调上皮细胞的形态发生。
Curr Biol. 1999 Mar 11;9(5):237-46. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(99)80112-2.
4
Coordinated morphogenesis of epithelia during development of the Caenorhabditis elegans uterine-vulval connection.秀丽隐杆线虫子宫-阴门连接发育过程中上皮细胞的协调形态发生。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Sep 3;93(18):9329-33. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.18.9329.
5
Vulval development.外阴发育
WormBook. 2005 Jun 25:1-28. doi: 10.1895/wormbook.1.6.1.
6
A gene expression fingerprint of C. elegans embryonic motor neurons.秀丽隐杆线虫胚胎运动神经元的基因表达指纹图谱。
BMC Genomics. 2005 Mar 21;6:42. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-6-42.
7
A tissue-specific enhancer of the C. elegans nhr-67/tailless gene drives coordinated expression in uterine stem cells and the differentiated anchor cell.秀丽隐杆线虫nhr-67/无尾基因的组织特异性增强子驱动子宫干细胞和分化的锚定细胞中的协同表达。
Gene Expr Patterns. 2018 Dec;30:71-81. doi: 10.1016/j.gep.2018.10.003. Epub 2018 Nov 4.
8
Influences of HLH-2 stability on anchor cell fate specification during Caenorhabditis elegans gonadogenesis.HLH-2 稳定性对秀丽隐杆线虫性腺发生过程中锚细胞命运特化的影响。
G3 (Bethesda). 2022 Apr 4;12(4). doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkac028.
9
The anchor cell initiates dorsal lumen formation during C. elegans vulval tubulogenesis.在秀丽隐杆线虫外阴小管发生过程中,锚定细胞启动背侧管腔形成。
Dev Biol. 2009 Apr 15;328(2):297-304. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.01.034. Epub 2009 Feb 3.
10
Lentiviral Vectors Mediate Long-Term and High Efficiency Transgene Expression in HEK 293T cells.慢病毒载体介导HEK 293T细胞中长期高效的转基因表达。
Int J Med Sci. 2015 May 15;12(5):407-15. doi: 10.7150/ijms.11270. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
The C. elegans anchor cell: A model to elucidate mechanisms underlying invasion through basement membrane.秀丽隐杆线虫锚定细胞:一种阐明通过基底膜进行侵袭的潜在机制的模型。
Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2024 Feb 15;154(Pt A):23-34. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2023.07.002. Epub 2023 Jul 6.

本文引用的文献

1
The Caenorhabditis elegans anchor cell transcriptome: ribosome biogenesis drives cell invasion through basement membrane.秀丽隐杆线虫锚定细胞转录组:核糖体生物发生通过基底膜驱动细胞入侵。
Development. 2023 May 1;150(9). doi: 10.1242/dev.201570. Epub 2023 May 4.
2
Hemicentin-mediated type IV collagen assembly strengthens juxtaposed basement membrane linkage.半钙黏蛋白介导的 IV 型胶原组装增强毗邻基底膜的连接。
J Cell Biol. 2023 Jan 2;222(1). doi: 10.1083/jcb.202112096. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
3
Localized glucose import, glycolytic processing, and mitochondria generate a focused ATP burst to power basement-membrane invasion.
局部葡萄糖摄取、糖酵解处理和线粒体产生集中的 ATP 爆发,为基底膜侵袭提供动力。
Dev Cell. 2022 Mar 28;57(6):732-749.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2022.02.019. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
4
Noncanonical necrosis in 2 different cell types in a Caenorhabditis elegans NAD+ salvage pathway mutant.秀丽隐杆线虫烟酰胺腺嘌呤二核苷酸(NAD+)补救途径突变体中 2 种不同细胞类型的非典型性细胞坏死。
G3 (Bethesda). 2022 Apr 4;12(4). doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkac033.
5
Reciprocal EGFR signaling in the anchor cell ensures precise inter-organ connection during Caenorhabditis elegans vulval morphogenesis.锚细胞中的 EGFR 信号相互作用确保了秀丽隐杆线虫的生殖道发生过程中器官间的精确连接。
Development. 2022 Jan 1;149(1). doi: 10.1242/dev.199900. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
6
Autophagy in healthy aging and disease.自噬在健康衰老和疾病中的作用。
Nat Aging. 2021 Aug;1(8):634-650. doi: 10.1038/s43587-021-00098-4. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
7
Visualizing the metazoan proliferation-quiescence decision in vivo.在体可视化后生动物增殖-静止决策。
Elife. 2020 Dec 22;9:e63265. doi: 10.7554/eLife.63265.
8
HLH-2/E2A Expression Links Stochastic and Deterministic Elements of a Cell Fate Decision during C. elegans Gonadogenesis.HLH-2/E2A 表达在秀丽隐杆线虫性腺发生过程中连接细胞命运决定的随机和确定性因素。
Curr Biol. 2019 Sep 23;29(18):3094-3100.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.07.062. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
9
Element-Mediated CRISPR Integration of Transgenes in .通过元件介导的 CRISPR 技术将转基因整合到. 中。
G3 (Bethesda). 2019 Aug 8;9(8):2629-2635. doi: 10.1534/g3.119.400399.
10
Invading, Leading and Navigating Cells in : Insights into Cell Movement .在细胞运动中入侵、引领和导航细胞:洞察细胞运动。
Genetics. 2018 Jan;208(1):53-78. doi: 10.1534/genetics.117.300082.