Zhu Xiaoqin, Dou Diya, Pan Yangu
Department of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Research Institute of Social Development, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, China.
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 22;14:1116625. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1116625. eCollection 2023.
This study validated a Chinese Parental Psychological Control Scale (CPPCS) among secondary school students in mainland China.
The item pool consisting of 65 items was constructed based on consultation with existing measures and focus group interviews of 19 Chinese adolescents. After content validation conducted by 14 experts, a total of 40 items were retained and subject to further factorial validation based on a sample of 963 Chinese adolescents (mean age = 13.39 ± 0.72; 52.23% females).
Using the two random-split half samples, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses retained 30 items that loaded on three factors, including "relational induction" (twelve items), "harsh psychological control" (twelve items), and "social comparison shame" (six items). The three-factor structure was invariant across gender (male versus female) and grades (grade 7 versus grade 8) among the whole sample. Cronbach's αs of the three dimensions in maternal and paternal subscales ranged between 0.89 and 0.92, suggesting adequate internal consistency. The three dimensions were significantly correlated with each other, supporting the scale's convergent validity. The concurrent validity of the CPPCS was supported by the positive correlations between subscales and parental rejection, and the negative correlations between subscales and parental warmth. In addition, while the "harsh psychological control" and "social comparison shame" negatively predicted adolescents' well-being, "relational induction" positively predicted adolescents' well-being.
The findings suggest that the CPPCS is a promising instrument for measuring multidimensional psychological control among Chinese parents and for investigating and comparing individual dimensions' effect on adolescents' development.
本研究在中国大陆的中学生中验证了一份中国父母心理控制量表(CPPCS)。
基于对现有量表的咨询以及对19名中国青少年的焦点小组访谈,构建了一个包含65个条目的项目池。在14位专家进行内容效度验证后,共保留了40个条目,并基于963名中国青少年(平均年龄 = 13.39 ± 0.72;52.23%为女性)的样本进行进一步的因子效度验证。
使用两个随机划分的半样本,探索性和验证性因子分析保留了30个条目,这些条目加载在三个因子上,包括“关系诱导”(12个条目)、“严厉心理控制”(12个条目)和“社会比较羞耻感”(6个条目)。在整个样本中,三因子结构在性别(男性与女性)和年级(七年级与八年级)上具有不变性。母本和父本分量表中三个维度的Cronbach's α系数在0.89至0.92之间,表明内部一致性良好。这三个维度彼此显著相关,支持了该量表的收敛效度。CPPCS的同时效度得到了分量表与父母拒绝之间的正相关以及分量表与父母温暖之间的负相关的支持。此外,虽然“严厉心理控制”和“社会比较羞耻感”对青少年的幸福感有负向预测作用,但“关系诱导”对青少年的幸福感有正向预测作用。
研究结果表明,CPPCS是一种很有前景的工具,可用于测量中国父母的多维心理控制,并用于调查和比较各个维度对青少年发展的影响。