Suppr超能文献

女性的韧性观点和母亲韧性研究:一项定性研究。

Women's perspectives on resilience and research on resilience in motherhood: A qualitative study.

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

Trinity Centre for Maternity Care Research (TCMCR), School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2023 Aug;26(4):1575-1583. doi: 10.1111/hex.13762. Epub 2023 Apr 10.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Definitional perspectives and operational approaches to the concept of resilience vary within the literature; however, little is known of women's opinions on current resilience research, or the philosophical and methodological directions women believe such research should take. This research explored women's perspectives on resilience research in the perinatal period and early motherhood and sought their opinions on the ways in which they believe research should be advanced.

METHODS

Following ethical approval, online interviews were conducted with 14 ethnically and socioeconomically diverse women who were mothers. Findings from a concept analysis on resilience in pregnancy and early motherhood, conducted by the authors, were shared with women before and during the interview. Interviews were organised in sections corresponding to the findings within the concept analysis' four philosophical (Epistemology, Linguistic, Logic, Pragmatic) principles and thematically analysed.

RESULTS

Epistemology-Women endorsed a dynamic process definition, and viewed resilience as influenced by multilevel, multisystemic processes. Linguistic-Women viewed words such as 'adaptation' and 'adjustment' as being more active and empowering than the term 'coping' in relation to motherhood. Logic-Women were resistant to the predominant operational conceptualisation of resilience as illness absence. Pragmatic-Women were wary of resilience research being used to reduce mental health support for other mothers and families.

CONCLUSIONS

Women provided constructive criticisms on the current state of resilience literature. Women suggested actionable ways in which research may be developed to better align with the epistemological and ethical approaches women want to see in resilience and maternal mental health research.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Women who are mothers and participants in health research were consulted on their views of trends in mental health and resilience research in motherhood.

摘要

目的

文献中对韧性概念的定义视角和操作方法各不相同;然而,人们对女性对当前韧性研究的看法,以及她们认为此类研究应采取的哲学和方法论方向知之甚少。本研究探讨了女性对围产期和早期母亲身份韧性研究的看法,并寻求她们对她们认为应该推进研究的方式的意见。

方法

在获得伦理批准后,对 14 名具有不同种族和社会经济背景的母亲进行了在线访谈。作者对妊娠和早期母亲身份韧性的概念分析的结果在访谈之前和期间与女性分享。访谈按照概念分析的四个哲学(认识论、语言学、逻辑、语用学)原则中的发现组织,并进行主题分析。

结果

认识论-女性认可动态过程定义,并认为韧性受到多层次、多系统过程的影响。语言学-女性认为,与母亲身份相关,“适应”和“调整”等词比“应对”一词更积极、更有力量。逻辑-女性反对将韧性作为缺勤的主要操作性概念化。语用学-女性对将韧性研究用于减少对其他母亲和家庭的心理健康支持持谨慎态度。

结论

女性对当前韧性文献状况提出了建设性批评。女性提出了可采取的行动方法,以便更好地将研究与女性希望在韧性和孕产妇心理健康研究中看到的认识论和伦理方法保持一致。

患者或公众贡献

正在接受心理健康和韧性研究的母亲们被咨询了她们对母亲身份中的心理健康和韧性研究趋势的看法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48db/10349245/3338d8b77eca/HEX-26--g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验