Clinical Research Group in Health Sciences of Surgery. Department of Surgery, Ophthalmology, Otorhinolaryngology and Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Valladolid, Soria, Spain.
Department of Physiatry and Nursery, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Braz J Phys Ther. 2023 Mar-Apr;27(2):100502. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2023.100502. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
Low-back pain (LBP) may be directly or indirectly related to impairments from the hip joint.
To evaluate the effectiveness of hip interventions on pain and disability in patients with LBP in the short-, medium-, and long-term.
PubMed, Cochrane Library, PEDro, Web of Science, and SCOPUS databases were searched in November 2022. Randomized controlled trials involving hip-targeted interventions compared to specific low back interventions in patients with LBP were selected. The outcomes were pain intensity and disability. The quality of the studies was assessed with the risk of bias tool. GRADE was used to rate the certainty of evidence. Meta-analyses were conducted using random effects models.
A total of 2581 studies were screened. Eight were included in the meta-analysis involving 508 patients with LBP. The results provided very low certainty that both hip strengthening and hip stretching improved pain (MD = -0.66; 95% CI -0.86, -0.48; I:0%) (MD = -0.55; 95% CI -1.02, -0.08) and disability (SMD = -0.81; 95% CI -1.53, -0.10; I: 80%) (SMD = -1.03; 95% CI -1.82, -0.25) in the short-term, respectively. No benefits were found in the medium- or long-term. The risk of bias, heterogeneity, and imprecision of the results downgraded the level of evidence.
Very low certainty evidence suggest a positive effect of hip strengthening in isolation or combined with specific low back exercise and hip stretching combined with specific low back exercise for decreasing pain intensity and disability in the short-term, in patients with LBP.
PROSPERO CRD42022303173.
下背痛(LBP)可能直接或间接与髋关节功能障碍有关。
评估髋关节干预对 LBP 患者短期、中期和长期疼痛和残疾的效果。
2022 年 11 月检索 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆、PEDro、Web of Science 和 SCOPUS 数据库。选择涉及髋关节靶向干预与 LBP 特定腰部干预比较的随机对照试验。结局为疼痛强度和残疾。使用偏倚风险工具评估研究质量。使用 GRADE 对证据确定性进行评级。使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。
共筛选出 2581 项研究。8 项研究纳入荟萃分析,共 508 例 LBP 患者。结果表明,髋关节强化和髋关节伸展均能改善疼痛(MD=-0.66;95%CI-0.86,-0.48;I:0%)(MD=-0.55;95%CI-1.02,-0.08)和残疾(SMD=-0.81;95%CI-1.53,-0.10;I:80%)(SMD=-1.03;95%CI-1.82,-0.25),但证据确定性极低。在中、长期没有发现获益。结果的偏倚风险、异质性和不精确性降低了证据水平。
低确定性证据表明,髋关节强化单独或与特定的腰部运动联合使用,以及髋关节伸展联合特定的腰部运动,在短期内可降低 LBP 患者的疼痛强度和残疾程度。
PROSPERO CRD42022303173。