Suppr超能文献

长期护理机构中使用的精神药物不良药物事件监测工具的系统评价。

Systematic Review of Psychotropic Adverse Drug Event Monitoring Tools for Use in Long-Term Care Facilities.

机构信息

Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2023 Jun;24(6):773-781.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.03.003. Epub 2023 Apr 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate properties of psychotropic adverse drug event (ADE) monitoring tools intended for use in long-term care facilities.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Adults aged 18 years and older in nursing homes and other long-term care facilities.

METHODS

Medline, CINAHL, Embase, and PsycInfo were searched from inception to August 2022 for studies reporting the development, validation, or application of tools to monitor psychotropic ADEs. Screening, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed independently by 2 authors. Each tool was assessed under the domains of test-retest reliability, interrater reliability, content validity, and construct validity.

RESULTS

Eight studies that described 6 tools were included. Tools were developed in Wales (n = 2), United States (n = 1), Ireland (n = 1), Canada (n = 1), and Singapore (n = 1). Tools monitored 4 to 95 items related to antipsychotics (n = 6 tools), antidepressants (n = 4), benzodiazepines or hypnotics (n = 4), antiepileptics (n = 4), and dementia medications (n = 1). Tools commonly monitored sedation, tiredness, or sleepiness (n = 6), falls (n = 4), and tremor or extrapyramidal symptoms (n = 4). Tools were designed for application by nurses (n = 4), during family conferences (n = 1), and by general medical practitioners before repeat prescribing (n = 1). Two tools were reported to require 10 to 60 minutes to administer. Four tools were determined to have adequate content validity and 2 tools adequate interrater reliability. No tools reported test-retest reliability or construct validity.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Six published psychotropic ADE monitoring tools are heterogeneous in design and intended application. Existing tools are predominately designed for application by nurses with or without direct involvement of the wider multidisciplinary team. Further research is needed into models of care that facilitate psychotropic ADE monitoring in the long-term care facility setting, and the extent to which application of specific tools is associated with reduced medication-related harm.

摘要

目的

评估旨在用于长期护理机构的精神药物不良药物事件(ADE)监测工具的特性。

设计

系统评价。

设置和参与者

年龄在 18 岁及以上的养老院和其他长期护理机构中的成年人。

方法

从建库到 2022 年 8 月,在 Medline、CINAHL、Embase 和 PsycInfo 中搜索了报告工具开发、验证或应用以监测精神药物 ADE 的研究。两名作者独立进行了筛选、数据提取和质量评估。每个工具都根据测试 - 重测信度、评分者间信度、内容有效性和结构有效性进行评估。

结果

纳入了 8 项描述 6 种工具的研究。工具在威尔士(n=2)、美国(n=1)、爱尔兰(n=1)、加拿大(n=1)和新加坡(n=1)开发。工具监测了 4 至 95 项与抗精神病药(n=6 种工具)、抗抑郁药(n=4)、苯二氮䓬类或催眠药(n=4)、抗癫痫药(n=4)和痴呆症药物(n=1)相关的项目。工具通常监测镇静、疲倦或嗜睡(n=6)、跌倒(n=4)和震颤或锥体外系症状(n=4)。工具设计用于护士(n=4)、家庭会议(n=1)和普通内科医生在重复开药前(n=1)使用。有 2 种工具报告说需要 10 至 60 分钟才能完成。有 4 种工具被认为具有足够的内容有效性,有 2 种工具具有足够的评分者间信度。没有工具报告测试 - 重测信度或结构有效性。

结论和意义

已发表的 6 种精神药物 ADE 监测工具在设计和预期应用方面存在差异。现有的工具主要是为护士设计的,无论是否有更广泛的多学科团队的直接参与。需要进一步研究在长期护理机构环境中促进精神药物 ADE 监测的护理模式,以及应用特定工具与减少药物相关伤害的程度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验