Suppr超能文献

经导管动脉化疗栓塞术联合载药微球与立体定向体部放疗治疗肝细胞癌的多中心随机 2 期临床试验(TRENDY 试验)结果。

Transarterial Chemoembolization With Drug-Eluting Beads Versus Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Outcomes From a Multicenter, Randomized, Phase 2 Trial (the TRENDY Trial).

机构信息

Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2023 Sep 1;117(1):45-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.03.064. Epub 2023 Apr 8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare transarterial chemoembolization delivered with drug eluting beads (TACE-DEB) with stereotactioc body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a multicenter randomized trial.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients were included if they were eligible for TACE. They could also be recruited if they required treatment prior to liver transplantation. A maximum of four TACE-DEB procedures and ablation after incomplete TACE-DEB were both allowed. SBRT was delivered in six fractions of 8-9Gy. Primary end point was time to progression (TTP). Secondary endpoints were local control (LC), overall survival (OS), response rate (RR), toxicity, and quality of life (QoL). The calculated sample size was 100 patients.

RESULTS

Between May 2015 and April 2020, 30 patients were randomized to the study. Due to slow accrual the trial was closed prematurely. Two patients in the SBRT arm were considered ineligible leaving 16 patients in the TACE-DEB arm and 12 in the SBRT arm. Median follow-up was 28.1 months. Median TTP was 12 months for TACEDEB and 19 months for SBRT (p=0.15). Median LC was 12 months for TACE-DEB and >40 months (not reached) for SBRT (p=0.075). Median OS was 36.8 months for TACEDEB and 44.1 months for SBRT (p=0.36). A post-hoc analysis showed 100% for SBRT 1- and 2-year LC, and 54.4% and 43.6% for TACE-DEB (p=0.019). Both treatments resulted in RR>80%. Three episodes of possibly related toxicity grade ≥3 were observed after TACE-DEB. No episodes were observed after SBRT. QoL remained stable after both treatment arms.

CONCLUSIONS

In this trial, TTP after TACE-DEB was not significantly improved by SBRT, while SBRT showed higher local antitumoral activity than TACE-DEB, without detrimental effects on OS, toxicity and QoL. To overcome poor accrual in randomized trials that include SBRT, and to generate evidence for including SBRT in treatment guidelines, international cooperation is needed.

摘要

目的

在一项多中心随机试验中,比较经载药微球的肝动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE-DEB)与立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)在肝细胞癌(HCC)患者中的疗效。

方法和材料

符合 TACE 适应证的患者可入组。符合 TACE 适应证且需要在肝移植前治疗的患者也可入组。最多允许进行四次 TACE-DEB 操作和不完全 TACE-DEB 后的消融治疗。SBRT 采用 8-9Gy 的 6 个分次照射。主要终点是无进展生存期(TTP)。次要终点是局部控制率(LC)、总生存期(OS)、缓解率(RR)、毒性和生活质量(QoL)。计算的样本量为 100 例患者。

结果

2015 年 5 月至 2020 年 4 月,30 例患者被随机分配到该研究中。由于入组缓慢,该试验提前关闭。SBRT 组中有 2 例患者被认为不符合条件,TACE-DEB 组中有 16 例,SBRT 组中有 12 例。中位随访时间为 28.1 个月。TACE-DEB 组的中位 TTP 为 12 个月,SBRT 组为 19 个月(p=0.15)。TACE-DEB 组的中位 LC 为 12 个月,SBRT 组>40 个月(未达到)(p=0.075)。TACE-DEB 组的中位 OS 为 36.8 个月,SBRT 组为 44.1 个月(p=0.36)。事后分析显示,SBRT 的 1 年和 2 年 LC 率均为 100%,而 TACE-DEB 组的 LC 率分别为 54.4%和 43.6%(p=0.019)。两种治疗方法的 RR 均>80%。TACE-DEB 后观察到 3 例可能与治疗相关的≥3 级毒性事件。SBRT 后未观察到毒性事件。两种治疗后 QoL 均保持稳定。

结论

在这项试验中,SBRT 并不能显著改善 TACE-DEB 后的 TTP,而 SBRT 显示出比 TACE-DEB 更高的局部抗肿瘤活性,对 OS、毒性和 QoL 没有不利影响。为了克服包括 SBRT 在内的随机试验中较差的入组情况,并为将 SBRT 纳入治疗指南提供证据,需要国际合作。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验