• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开颅术后颅骨修补术植入物存活预测模型的建立。

Development of a Prediction Model for Cranioplasty Implant Survival Following Craniectomy.

机构信息

Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2023 Jul;175:e693-e703. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.04.008. Epub 2023 Apr 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2023.04.008
PMID:37037366
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cranioplasty after craniectomy can result in high rates of postoperative complications. Although determinants of postoperative outcomes have been identified, a prediction model for predicting cranioplasty implant survival does not exist. Thus, we sought to develop a prediction model for cranioplasty implant survival after craniectomy.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent cranioplasty following craniectomy between 2014 and 2020. Missing data were imputed using multiple imputation. For model development, multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed. To test whether candidate determinants contributed to the model, we performed backward selection using the Akaike information criterion. We corrected for overfitting using bootstrapping techniques. The performance of the model was assessed using discrimination and calibration.

RESULTS

A total of 182 patients were included (mean age, 43.0 ± 19.7 years). Independent determinants of cranioplasty implant survival included the indication for craniectomy (compared with trauma-vascular disease: hazard ratio [HR], 0.65 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.36-1.17]; infection: HR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.32-1.80]; tumor: HR, 1.40 [95% CI, 0.29-6.79]), cranial defect size (HR, 1.01 per cm [95% CI, 0.73-1.38]), use of an autologous bone flap (HR, 1.63 [95% CI, 0.82-3.24]), and skin closure using staples (HR, 1.42 [95% CI, 0.79-2.56]). The concordance index of the model was 0.60 (95% CI, 0.47-0.73).

CONCLUSIONS

We have developed the first prediction model for cranioplasty implant survival after craniectomy. The findings from our study require external validation and deserve further exploration in future studies.

摘要

背景

颅骨切除术 后行颅骨修补术可导致术后并发症发生率较高。尽管已经确定了术后结局的决定因素,但尚无预测颅骨修补术植入物存活率的预测模型。因此,我们试图开发一种预测颅骨切除术 后颅骨修补术植入物存活率的模型。

方法

我们对 2014 年至 2020 年间行颅骨修补术的患者进行了回顾性队列研究。使用多重插补法对缺失数据进行插补。为了开发模型,我们进行了多变量 Cox 比例风险回归分析。为了测试候选决定因素是否对模型有贡献,我们使用赤池信息量准则进行了向后选择。我们使用自举技术纠正过拟合。使用区分度和校准度评估模型的性能。

结果

共纳入 182 例患者(平均年龄 43.0 ± 19.7 岁)。颅骨修补术植入物存活率的独立决定因素包括颅骨切除术的指征(与创伤血管疾病相比:风险比 [HR],0.65 [95%置信区间 (CI),0.36-1.17];感染:HR,0.76 [95%CI,0.32-1.80];肿瘤:HR,1.40 [95%CI,0.29-6.79])、颅骨缺损大小(HR,每厘米增加 1.01 [95%CI,0.73-1.38])、使用自体骨瓣(HR,1.63 [95%CI,0.82-3.24])和使用订书钉进行皮肤闭合(HR,1.42 [95%CI,0.79-2.56])。模型的一致性指数为 0.60(95%CI,0.47-0.73)。

结论

我们已经开发出第一个颅骨切除术 后颅骨修补术植入物存活率的预测模型。我们的研究结果需要外部验证,值得在未来的研究中进一步探讨。

相似文献

1
Development of a Prediction Model for Cranioplasty Implant Survival Following Craniectomy.开颅术后颅骨修补术植入物存活预测模型的建立。
World Neurosurg. 2023 Jul;175:e693-e703. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.04.008. Epub 2023 Apr 8.
2
Cryopreservation of Autologous Cranial Bone Flaps for Cranioplasty: A Large Sample Retrospective Study.自体颅骨瓣冷冻保存用于颅骨成形术:一项大样本回顾性研究。
World Neurosurg. 2018 Jan;109:e853-e859. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.10.112. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
3
Factors related to failure of autologous cranial reconstructions after decompressive craniectomy.去骨瓣减压术后自体颅骨重建失败的相关因素。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019 Sep;47(9):1420-1425. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.02.007. Epub 2019 Feb 16.
4
Subcutaneous bone flap storage after emergency craniectomy: cost-effectiveness and rate of resorption.紧急开颅术后皮下骨瓣储存的成本效益和吸收率。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Dec 1;129(6):1604-1610. doi: 10.3171/2017.6.JNS17943. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
5
Complications following pediatric cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: a multicenter retrospective study.减压性颅骨切除术后小儿颅骨修补术的并发症:一项多中心回顾性研究。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2018 Sep;22(3):225-232. doi: 10.3171/2018.3.PEDS17234. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
6
Complications of skull reconstruction after decompressive craniectomy.减压性颅骨切除术后颅骨重建的并发症。
Acta Chir Belg. 2017 Jun;117(3):149-156. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2016.1264730. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
7
Management of decompressive craniectomy defects: modern military treatment strategies.减压性颅骨切除术缺损的管理:现代军事治疗策略
J Craniofac Surg. 2012 Nov;23(7 Suppl 1):2042-5. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e318258ba36.
8
Subgaleal drains may be associated with decreased infection following autologous cranioplasty: a retrospective analysis.头皮下引流可能与自体颅骨修补术后感染减少有关:回顾性分析。
Br J Neurosurg. 2024 Aug;38(4):877-883. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2021.1995588. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
9
Factors Affecting Resorption Following Cranioplasty with an Autologous Bone Graft.影响自体骨移植颅骨成形术后骨吸收的因素。
Turk Neurosurg. 2024;34(4):600-606. doi: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.44249-23.2.
10
Low Incidence of Bone Flap Resorption After Native Bone Cranioplasty in Adults.成人自体骨颅骨修补术后骨瓣吸收发生率低。
World Neurosurg. 2016 Aug;92:89-94. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.04.115. Epub 2016 May 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of cranial implants compared with autologous bone grafts.颅骨植入物与自体骨移植的成本效益比较。
Brain Spine. 2025 Feb 19;5:104217. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2025.104217. eCollection 2025.
2
Consensus on the prevention and repair of titanium mesh exposed wound after cranioplasty (2024 edition).颅骨修补术后钛网外露创面预防与修复专家共识(2024版)
Burns Trauma. 2024 Oct 23;12:tkae055. doi: 10.1093/burnst/tkae055. eCollection 2024.