Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Hilvarenbeekseweg 60, 5022 GC, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019 Sep;47(9):1420-1425. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.02.007. Epub 2019 Feb 16.
Cranioplasty is customary after decompressive craniectomy. Many different materials have been developed and used for this procedure. The ideal material does not yet exist, while complication rates in cranioplasties remain high. This study aimed to determine factors related to autologous bone flap failure.
In this two-center retrospective cohort study, 276 patients underwent autologous bone cranioplasty after initial decompressive craniectomy between 2004 and 2014. Medical records were reviewed regarding patient characteristics and factors potentially related to bone flap failure. Data were analyzed using univariable and multivariable regression analysis.
Independent factors related to overall bone flap failure were: duration of hospitalization after decompressive craniectomy [OR: 1.012 (95%CI: 1.003-1.022); p = 0.012], time interval between decompressive craniectomy and cranioplasty [OR: 1.018 (95%CI: 1.004-1.032); p = 0.013], and follow-up duration [OR: 1.034 (95%CI: 1.020-1.047); p < 0.001]. In patients with bone flap infection, neoplasm as initial diagnosis occurred significantly more often (29.2% vs. 7.8%; RD 21.3%; 95%CI 8.4 -38.3%; NNH 5; 95%CI 3 -12) and duration of hospitalization after decompressive craniectomy tended to be longer (means 54 vs. 28 days, MD 26.2 days, 95%CI -8.6 to 60.9 days). Patients with bone flap resorption were significantly younger (35 vs. 43 years, MD 7.7 years, 95%CI 0.8-14.6 years) and their cranial defect size tended to be wider than in patients without bone flap resorption (mean circumference 39 vs. 37 cm; MD 2.4 cm, 95% CI -0.43-5.2 cm) and follow-up duration was significantly longer (44 vs. 14 months, MD 29 months, 95%CI 17-42 months).
A neoplasm as initial diagnosis, longer hospitalization after decompressive craniectomy, larger time interval between decompressive craniectomy and cranioplasty, and longer follow-up duration are associated with a higher risk of failure of autologous bone flaps for cranioplasty. Patients with these risk factors may be better served with an early recovery program after decompressive surgery or an alloplastic material for cranioplasty.
去骨瓣减压术后常需行颅骨修补术。为此已开发和使用了许多不同的材料。目前还没有理想的材料,而且颅骨修补术的并发症发生率仍然很高。本研究旨在确定与自体骨瓣失败相关的因素。
在这项两中心回顾性队列研究中,2004 年至 2014 年间共有 276 例患者在初次去骨瓣减压术后行自体骨颅骨修补术。回顾病历,记录与骨瓣失败相关的患者特征和潜在因素。采用单变量和多变量回归分析进行数据分析。
与总体骨瓣失败相关的独立因素包括:去骨瓣减压术后住院时间[比值比(OR):1.012(95%可信区间[CI]:1.003-1.022);p=0.012]、去骨瓣减压术与颅骨修补术之间的时间间隔[OR:1.018(95%CI:1.004-1.032);p=0.013]和随访时间[OR:1.034(95%CI:1.020-1.047);p<0.001]。在发生骨瓣感染的患者中,初始诊断为肿瘤的患者发生率明显更高(29.2%比 7.8%;差异 21.3%;95%CI 8.4-38.3%;NNH 5;95%CI 3-12),且去骨瓣减压术后的住院时间也较长(平均 54 天比 28 天,MD 26.2 天,95%CI-8.6 至 60.9 天)。发生骨瓣吸收的患者明显更年轻(35 岁比 43 岁,MD 7.7 岁,95%CI 0.8-14.6 岁),其颅骨缺损面积也大于未发生骨瓣吸收的患者(平均周长 39 厘米比 37 厘米;MD 2.4 厘米,95%CI-0.43-5.2 厘米),且随访时间明显更长(44 个月比 14 个月,MD 29 个月,95%CI 17-42 个月)。
初始诊断为肿瘤、去骨瓣减压术后住院时间较长、去骨瓣减压术与颅骨修补术之间的时间间隔较长以及随访时间较长与自体骨颅骨修补术失败的风险增加相关。对于具有这些风险因素的患者,可能需要在去骨瓣减压术后早期恢复计划或使用颅骨修补术的同种异体材料。