Mechanical Thrombectomy Versus Best Medical Management for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Elderly Patients: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the cost-effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) versus best medical management (BMM) in patients aged ≥80 years.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature review to identify comparative studies of MT versus BMM with or without intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator (IV tPA) in patients ≥80 years. Clinical data including outcomes and mortality categorized as modified Rankin scale scores 0-2, 3-5, and 6, were collected from identified studies, and effectiveness scores were assigned to each outcome. Costs associated with stroke outcomes were derived from previous literature, including costs associated with initial and follow-up imaging, hospitalization, physicians/associated personnel, and MT. TreeAge Pro software was used to construct a cost-effectiveness analysis model of clinical data from studies and costs derived from the literature.

RESULTS

The review identified 1 relevant comparative study. The cost model demonstrated total annual cumulative overall per-patient costs of $30,064.21 for BMM with IV tPA and $21,940.36 for BMM without IV tPA. Overall effectiveness scores were 0.61 and 0.62, respectively. MT had a cumulative total annual per-patient cost of $47,849.54 and an overall effectiveness score of 0.40. The cost-effectiveness ratios of total cumulative patient cost to overall outcome effectiveness score for the 3 treatments were as follows: BMM with IV tPA = $49,285.59, BMM without IV tPA = $35,387.58, and MT = $119,623.85. BMM with or without IV tPA was found to be more cost-effective than MT.

CONCLUSIONS

This study utilized stroke outcomes data for patients aged ≥80 years to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis. MT was found to be less cost-effective than BMM with and without IV tPA.