• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年急性缺血性脑卒中患者机械取栓的质量调整生命年与成本

Quality-adjusted Life Years and Costs of Mechanical Thrombectomy for Very Elderly Patients with Acute Ischaemic Stroke.

作者信息

Inaba Takeshi, Sakuma Mio, Sakakibara Fumihiro, Uchida Kazutaka, Morimoto Takeshi

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Hyogo Medical University.

Department of Neurosurgery, Hyogo Medical University.

出版信息

Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2025 Feb 15;65(2):52-60. doi: 10.2176/jns-nmc.2024-0157. Epub 2024 Dec 25.

DOI:10.2176/jns-nmc.2024-0157
PMID:39721667
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11891145/
Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in patients aged 90 years and older with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS). We developed a cost-effectiveness model to compare MT with standard medical care (SMC) to SMC alone. The model, incorporating parameters for the effectiveness and costs of MT with SMC and SMC alone, was simulated until the cohort reached 100 years of age. The parameters were estimated from the prospective cohort study of the RESCUE-Japan Registry 2, claims databases, and published literature, with the perspective being Japan's public healthcare system. In the base-case model for an 8-year simulation period, the quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for MT with SMC and SMC alone were 1.463 and 1.054 years, respectively. The expected costs were 14,553,772 Yen and 13,732,646 Yen, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of MT with SMC compared to SMC alone was 2,009,744 Yen per QALY. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed a 66% probability that MT with SMC would be below the ICER threshold of 5,000,000 Yen per QALY. The cost-effectiveness analyses demonstrated that performing MT in addition to SMC for AIS in patients aged 90 years and older was acceptable from a cost-effectiveness perspective.

摘要

本研究旨在评估机械取栓术(MT)对90岁及以上急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者的成本效益。我们建立了一个成本效益模型,将MT与标准医疗护理(SMC)单独使用的情况进行比较。该模型纳入了MT联合SMC和单独使用SMC的有效性和成本参数,模拟至队列达到100岁。这些参数是根据RESCUE-Japan Registry 2的前瞻性队列研究、索赔数据库和已发表的文献估计得出的,视角为日本的公共医疗保健系统。在为期8年的模拟期的基础案例模型中,MT联合SMC和单独使用SMC的质量调整生命年(QALY)分别为1.463年和1.054年。预期成本分别为14,553,772日元和13,732,646日元。MT联合SMC相对于单独使用SMC的增量成本效益比(ICER)为每QALY 2,009,744日元。概率敏感性分析显示,MT联合SMC低于每QALY 5,000,000日元的ICER阈值的概率为66%。成本效益分析表明,从成本效益角度来看,在90岁及以上AIS患者中除SMC外进行MT是可以接受的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3e6/11891145/0396866a1a53/1349-8029-65-2-0052-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3e6/11891145/3c37623eabdb/1349-8029-65-2-0052-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3e6/11891145/538ea4d2cc13/1349-8029-65-2-0052-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3e6/11891145/0396866a1a53/1349-8029-65-2-0052-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3e6/11891145/3c37623eabdb/1349-8029-65-2-0052-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3e6/11891145/538ea4d2cc13/1349-8029-65-2-0052-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3e6/11891145/0396866a1a53/1349-8029-65-2-0052-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Quality-adjusted Life Years and Costs of Mechanical Thrombectomy for Very Elderly Patients with Acute Ischaemic Stroke.老年急性缺血性脑卒中患者机械取栓的质量调整生命年与成本
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2025 Feb 15;65(2):52-60. doi: 10.2176/jns-nmc.2024-0157. Epub 2024 Dec 25.
2
Cost-effectiveness of Mechanical Thrombectomy More Than 6 Hours After Symptom Onset Among Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke.机械取栓治疗超过发病 6 小时的急性缺血性脑卒中患者的成本效益。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Aug 3;3(8):e2012476. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.12476.
3
The economic impact associated with stent retriever selection for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: a cost-effectiveness analysis of MASTRO I data from a Chinese healthcare system perspective.支架取栓术选择治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的经济影响:基于中国医疗体系视角下 MASTRO I 数据的成本效果分析。
J Comp Eff Res. 2024 Nov;13(11):e240160. doi: 10.57264/cer-2024-0160. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
4
A systematic review of the socioeconomic impact of mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中机械取栓的社会经济影响的系统评价。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2024 Nov;33(11):107906. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.107906. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
5
Cost-effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: an Australian payer perspective.急性缺血性中风机械取栓术的成本效益:澳大利亚医保支付方视角
J Med Econ. 2018 Aug;21(8):799-809. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1474746. Epub 2018 May 30.
6
Cost-effectiveness analysis of mechanical thrombectomy plus tissue-type plasminogen activator compared with tissue-type plasminogen activator alone for acute ischemic stroke in France.法国急性缺血性脑卒中采用机械取栓联合组织型纤溶酶原激活剂与单独使用组织型纤溶酶原激活剂的成本效果分析。
Rev Neurol (Paris). 2019 Apr;175(4):252-260. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2018.06.007. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
7
Cost-effectiveness analysis of mechanical thrombectomy with stent retriever in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke in Italy.意大利使用支架取栓器进行机械取栓治疗急性缺血性卒中的成本效益分析。
J Med Econ. 2018 Sep;21(9):902-911. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1484748. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
8
Cost-effectiveness of endovascular therapy for acute stroke with a large ischemic region in Japan: impact of the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score on cost-effectiveness.日本针对大面积缺血区域急性卒中的血管内治疗的成本效益:阿尔伯塔卒中项目早期CT评分对成本效益的影响。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2024 Dec 26;17(e1):e60-e67. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2023-021068.
9
Cost-utility analysis of mechanical thrombectomy between 6 and 24 hours in acute ischemic stroke.6 至 24 小时时间窗内急性缺血性脑卒中机械取栓的成本效用分析。
Int J Stroke. 2020 Jan;15(1):75-84. doi: 10.1177/1747493019830587. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
10
Cost-Effectiveness of Mechanical Thrombectomy for Treatment of Nonminor Ischemic Stroke Across Europe.机械取栓治疗非小卒中型欧洲各地缺血性脑卒中的成本效益分析。
Stroke. 2021 Jan;52(2):664-673. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031027. Epub 2021 Jan 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcome after Endovascular Treatment of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke with Large Vessel Occlusion over 90 Years of Age.90岁以上急性缺血性卒中伴大血管闭塞患者血管内治疗后的结局
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2025 Apr 15;65(4):186-194. doi: 10.2176/jns-nmc.2024-0232. Epub 2025 Feb 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Mechanical Thrombectomy for Large Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.机械取栓治疗大面积缺血性脑卒中:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurology. 2023 Aug 29;101(9):e922-e932. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207536. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
2
Mechanical Thrombectomy Versus Best Medical Management for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Elderly Patients: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.机械取栓与最佳药物治疗对老年急性缺血性脑卒中的成本效果分析。
World Neurosurg. 2023 Jul;175:e730-e737. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.04.012. Epub 2023 Apr 8.
3
Outcomes of Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke in Patients Aged ≥90 Years.
≥90 岁患者的大血管闭塞性卒中结局。
Stroke. 2021 May;52(5):1561-1569. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031386. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
4
Cost-effectiveness of Mechanical Thrombectomy More Than 6 Hours After Symptom Onset Among Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke.机械取栓治疗超过发病 6 小时的急性缺血性脑卒中患者的成本效益。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Aug 3;3(8):e2012476. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.12476.
5
Cost-utility analysis of mechanical thrombectomy between 6 and 24 hours in acute ischemic stroke.6 至 24 小时时间窗内急性缺血性脑卒中机械取栓的成本效用分析。
Int J Stroke. 2020 Jan;15(1):75-84. doi: 10.1177/1747493019830587. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
6
Thrombectomy for Stroke at 6 to 16 Hours with Selection by Perfusion Imaging.6至16小时卒中的血栓切除术及灌注成像选择
N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 22;378(8):708-718. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1713973. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
7
Thrombectomy 6 to 24 Hours after Stroke with a Mismatch between Deficit and Infarct.发病后 6 至 24 小时内进行取栓术治疗与缺损和梗死不匹配的脑卒中。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 4;378(1):11-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1706442. Epub 2017 Nov 11.
8
Cost-effectiveness analysis of mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke.急性缺血性卒中机械取栓术的成本效益分析
J Neurosurg. 2009 Mar;110(3):508-13. doi: 10.3171/2008.8.JNS08133.
9
Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients.中风患者残疾评估的观察者间一致性。
Stroke. 1988 May;19(5):604-7. doi: 10.1161/01.str.19.5.604.