• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于不平衡样本比的滑坡易发性制图的对比研究。

Comparative study on landslide susceptibility mapping based on unbalanced sample ratio.

机构信息

School of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Environment, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, People's Republic of China.

Innovation Demonstration Base of Ecological Environment Geotechnical and Ecological Restoration of Rivers and Lakes, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 10;13(1):5823. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33186-z.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-33186-z
PMID:37037885
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10086050/
Abstract

The Zigui-Badong section of the Three Gorges Reservoir area is used as the research area in this study to research the impact of unbalanced sample sets on Landslide Susceptibility Mapping (LSM) and determine the sample ratio interval with the best performance for different models. We employ 12 LSM factors, five training sample sets with different sample ratios (1:1, 1:2, 1:4, 1:8, and 1:16), and C5.0, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression (LR), and one-dimensional Convolution Neural Network (CNN) models are used to obtain landslide susceptibility index and landslide susceptibility zoning in the study area, respectively. The prediction performance of the model is evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic curve area under the curve value, five statistical methods, and specific category precision. The results show that the CNN, SVM, and LR models in the sample ratio of 1:2 achieve better performance than on the balanced sample set, which indicates the importance of the unbalanced sample set in training the LSM modeling. The C5.0 model is always in a state of overfitting in this study and needs to be further studied. The conclusions put forward in this study help improve the scientificity and reliability of LSM.

摘要

本研究以三峡库区秭归-巴东段为研究区,研究不平衡样本集对滑坡易发性制图(LSM)的影响,并确定不同模型性能最佳的样本比例区间。我们采用了 12 个 LSM 因子、五个具有不同样本比例(1:1、1:2、1:4、1:8 和 1:16)的训练样本集,使用 C5.0、支持向量机(SVM)、逻辑回归(LR)和一维卷积神经网络(CNN)模型,分别获得研究区的滑坡易发性指数和滑坡易发性分区。通过接收者操作特征曲线下的曲线值、五种统计方法和特定类别精度来评估模型的预测性能。结果表明,在样本比例为 1:2 时,CNN、SVM 和 LR 模型的性能优于平衡样本集,这表明不平衡样本集在训练 LSM 模型中的重要性。在本研究中,C5.0 模型始终处于过拟合状态,需要进一步研究。本研究提出的结论有助于提高 LSM 的科学性和可靠性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00f4/10086050/7ad8c1693080/41598_2023_33186_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00f4/10086050/792b77bea712/41598_2023_33186_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00f4/10086050/42fe86e4db4d/41598_2023_33186_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00f4/10086050/b0bf38ffbe4c/41598_2023_33186_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00f4/10086050/f669487a1e41/41598_2023_33186_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00f4/10086050/a91e2cf701c6/41598_2023_33186_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00f4/10086050/57b128735f9b/41598_2023_33186_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00f4/10086050/d8f1d6ebe4c1/41598_2023_33186_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00f4/10086050/88e97d958e47/41598_2023_33186_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00f4/10086050/181c7c5e99ca/41598_2023_33186_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00f4/10086050/b982fa7a6f5a/41598_2023_33186_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00f4/10086050/f3687ffee4b7/41598_2023_33186_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00f4/10086050/0814e0737c3e/41598_2023_33186_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00f4/10086050/7ad8c1693080/41598_2023_33186_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00f4/10086050/792b77bea712/41598_2023_33186_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00f4/10086050/42fe86e4db4d/41598_2023_33186_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00f4/10086050/b0bf38ffbe4c/41598_2023_33186_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00f4/10086050/f669487a1e41/41598_2023_33186_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00f4/10086050/a91e2cf701c6/41598_2023_33186_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00f4/10086050/57b128735f9b/41598_2023_33186_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00f4/10086050/d8f1d6ebe4c1/41598_2023_33186_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00f4/10086050/88e97d958e47/41598_2023_33186_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00f4/10086050/181c7c5e99ca/41598_2023_33186_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00f4/10086050/b982fa7a6f5a/41598_2023_33186_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00f4/10086050/f3687ffee4b7/41598_2023_33186_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00f4/10086050/0814e0737c3e/41598_2023_33186_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00f4/10086050/7ad8c1693080/41598_2023_33186_Fig13_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative study on landslide susceptibility mapping based on unbalanced sample ratio.基于不平衡样本比的滑坡易发性制图的对比研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 10;13(1):5823. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33186-z.
2
Study on landslide susceptibility mapping based on rock-soil characteristic factors.基于岩土特征因子的滑坡敏感性制图研究
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 29;11(1):15476. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94936-5.
3
Research on the influence of different sampling resolution and spatial resolution in sampling strategy on landslide susceptibility mapping results.研究采样策略中不同采样分辨率和空间分辨率对滑坡易发性制图结果的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 18;14(1):1549. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52145-w.
4
A landslide susceptibility map based on spatial scale segmentation: A case study at Zigui-Badong in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China.基于空间尺度分割的滑坡易发性图:以中国三峡库区秭归-巴东段为例。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 11;15(3):e0229818. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229818. eCollection 2020.
5
A Combination of Geographically Weighted Regression, Particle Swarm Optimization and Support Vector Machine for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study at Wanzhou in the Three Gorges Area, China.地理加权回归、粒子群优化和支持向量机相结合用于滑坡易发性制图:以中国三峡地区万州为例
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 May 11;13(5):487. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13050487.
6
Landslide susceptibility assessment using deep learning considering unbalanced samples distribution.基于深度学习并考虑样本分布不均衡的滑坡易发性评估
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 23;10(9):e30107. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30107. eCollection 2024 May 15.
7
GIS-based landslide susceptibility zoning using a coupled model: a case study in Badong County, China.基于 GIS 的滑坡敏感性分区耦合模型:以中国巴东县为例。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Jan;31(4):6213-6231. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31621-2. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
8
Application of Bagging, Boosting and Stacking Ensemble and EasyEnsemble Methods for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area of China.Bagging、Boosting 和 Stacking 集成方法和 EasyEnsemble 方法在三峡库区滑坡敏感性制图中的应用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 11;20(6):4977. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064977.
9
Dynamic landslide susceptibility mapping based on the PS-InSAR deformation intensity.基于 PS-InSAR 形变强度的动态滑坡易发性制图
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Jan;31(5):7872-7888. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31688-x. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
10
GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping in the Longmen Mountain area (China) using three different machine learning algorithms and their comparison.基于 GIS 的龙门山地区(中国)滑坡敏感性制图研究,使用三种不同的机器学习算法及其比较。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Aug;30(38):88612-88626. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-28730-3. Epub 2023 Jul 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of landslide susceptibility based on SMOTE-Tomek sampling and machine learning algorithm.基于SMOTE-Tomek采样和机器学习算法的滑坡敏感性评估
PLoS One. 2025 May 21;20(5):e0323487. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323487. eCollection 2025.
2
Research on the influence of different sampling resolution and spatial resolution in sampling strategy on landslide susceptibility mapping results.研究采样策略中不同采样分辨率和空间分辨率对滑坡易发性制图结果的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 18;14(1):1549. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52145-w.
3
A review on landslide susceptibility mapping research in Bangladesh.

本文引用的文献

1
Study on landslide susceptibility mapping based on rock-soil characteristic factors.基于岩土特征因子的滑坡敏感性制图研究
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 29;11(1):15476. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94936-5.
2
Optimizing an Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System for Spatial Prediction of Landslide Susceptibility Using Four State-of-the-art Metaheuristic Techniques.利用四种最先进的元启发式技术优化用于滑坡易发性空间预测的自适应神经模糊推理系统。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Mar 19;20(6):1723. doi: 10.3390/s20061723.
3
A landslide susceptibility map based on spatial scale segmentation: A case study at Zigui-Badong in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China.
孟加拉国滑坡易发性制图研究综述。
Heliyon. 2023 Jul 13;9(7):e17972. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17972. eCollection 2023 Jul.
基于空间尺度分割的滑坡易发性图:以中国三峡库区秭归-巴东段为例。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 11;15(3):e0229818. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229818. eCollection 2020.
4
Modeling landslide susceptibility using LogitBoost alternating decision trees and forest by penalizing attributes with the bagging ensemble.利用 LogitBoost 交替决策树和通过袋装集成惩罚属性的森林进行滑坡敏感性建模。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 May 20;718:137231. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137231. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
5
Piecewise Classifier Mappings: Learning Fine-Grained Learners for Novel Categories With Few Examples.分段分类器映射:利用少量示例学习新颖类别中的细粒度学习者。
IEEE Trans Image Process. 2019 Dec;28(12):6116-6125. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2019.2924811. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
6
Comparison of convolutional neural networks for landslide susceptibility mapping in Yanshan County, China.中国燕山地区滑坡易发性的卷积神经网络比较。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 May 20;666:975-993. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.263. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
7
Performance evaluation of the GIS-based data mining techniques of best-first decision tree, random forest, and naïve Bayes tree for landslide susceptibility modeling.基于 GIS 的最佳优先决策树、随机森林和朴素贝叶斯树数据挖掘技术在滑坡易发性建模中的性能评价。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Dec 10;644:1006-1018. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.389. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
8
Optimizing the Predictive Ability of Machine Learning Methods for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using SMOTE for Lishui City in Zhejiang Province, China.利用 SMOTE 优化机器学习方法在浙江省丽水市滑坡易发性制图中的预测能力。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 28;16(3):368. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030368.
9
Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Using Integrated Deep Learning Algorithm along the China-Nepal Highway.利用深度学习算法评估沿中尼公路的滑坡敏感性。
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Dec 14;18(12):4436. doi: 10.3390/s18124436.
10
Optimal classifier for imbalanced data using Matthews Correlation Coefficient metric.使用马修斯相关系数度量的不平衡数据最优分类器。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 2;12(6):e0177678. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177678. eCollection 2017.