Langton Calvin M, Betteridge Mackenzie, Worling James R
University of Windsor, Ontario, Canada.
Private Practice, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Assessment. 2024 Mar;31(2):418-430. doi: 10.1177/10731911231163617. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
The Structured Assessment of PROtective Factors for violence risk (SAPROF) is a widely used structured professional judgment (SPJ) tool. Its indices have predictive validity regarding desistance from future violence in adult correctional/forensic psychiatric populations. Although not intended for applied use with youth, SAPROF items lend themselves to an investigation of whether their operationalizations capture only strengths or also risks. With 229 justice-involved male adolescents followed for a fixed 3-year period, promotive, risk, and mixed effects were found. Most SAPROF items exerted a mixed effect, being associated with higher lower likelihoods of violent and any reoffending at opposite ends of their trichotomous ratings. Summing items weighted using their promotive and risk odds ratios produced statistically significant improvements in predictive accuracy, improvements found also with a cross-validation sample of 171 justice-involved youth. The nature of strengths and implications for the development of SPJ tools and training in their use were discussed.
暴力风险保护因素结构化评估(SAPROF)是一种广泛使用的结构化专业判断(SPJ)工具。其指标对于成年惩教/法医精神病学人群未来停止暴力行为具有预测效度。尽管SAPROF并非旨在用于青少年,但该工具的项目有助于调查其操作化是否仅涵盖优势或也涵盖风险。对229名涉及司法的男性青少年进行了为期3年的固定跟踪研究,发现了促进、风险和混合效应。大多数SAPROF项目都产生了混合效应,在其三分类评分的两端,与暴力和再次犯罪的可能性较高或较低相关。使用促进和风险优势比加权计算项目得分,在预测准确性方面产生了具有统计学意义的提高,在由171名涉及司法的青少年组成的交叉验证样本中也发现了这种提高。文中讨论了优势的性质以及对SPJ工具开发及其使用培训的启示。