• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会决定因素与粪便潜血试验在结直肠癌筛查中的参与:定性系统评价和荟萃综合。

Social determinants and participation in fecal occult blood test based colorectal cancer screening: A qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

University of Queensland, Faculty of Medicine, Herston, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Health Promot J Austr. 2024 Jan;35(1):9-36. doi: 10.1002/hpja.732. Epub 2023 Apr 26.

DOI:10.1002/hpja.732
PMID:37039425
Abstract

ISSUE ADDRESSED

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening through fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) has saved thousands of lives globally with multiple countries adopting comprehensive population wide screening programs. Participation rates in FOBT based CRC screening for the socially and economically disadvantaged remains low. The aim of this systematic review is to explore empirical evidence that will guide targeted interventions to improve participation rates within priority populations.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cinahl and PsycInfo were systematically searched from inception to 22 June 2022. Eligible studies contained qualitative evidence identifying barriers to FOBT based CRC screening for populations impacted by the social determinants of health. An inductive thematic synthesis approach was applied using grounded theory methodology, to explore descriptive themes and interpret these into higher order analytical constructs and theories.

RESULTS

A total of 8,501 publications were identified and screened. A total of 48 studies from 10 countries were eligible for inclusion, representing 2,232 subjects. Coding within included studies resulted in 30 key descriptive themes with a thematic frequency greater than 10%. Coded themes applied to four overarching, interconnected barriers driving inequality for priority populations: social, behavioural, economic and technical/interfaces. SO WHAT?: This study has highlighted the need for stronger patient/provider relationships to mitigate barriers to FOBT screening participation for diverse groups. Findings can assist health professionals and policy makers address the systemic exclusion of priority populations in cancer screening by moving beyond the responsibility of the individual to a focus on addressing the information asymmetry driving low value perceptions.

摘要

问题解决

通过粪便潜血检测(FOBT)进行的结直肠癌(CRC)筛查在全球范围内挽救了数千人的生命,多个国家都采用了全面的人群筛查计划。社会经济弱势群体参与 FOBT 结直肠癌筛查的比例仍然较低。本系统评价的目的是探索实证证据,以指导针对优先人群的干预措施,提高参与率。

方法

从建库到 2022 年 6 月 22 日,系统检索了 PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Cinahl 和 PsycInfo。合格的研究包含定性证据,确定了受健康社会决定因素影响的人群进行 FOBT 结直肠癌筛查的障碍。采用扎根理论方法,应用归纳主题综合方法,探索描述性主题,并将其解释为更高层次的分析结构和理论。

结果

共确定了 8501 篇文献并进行了筛选。共有来自 10 个国家的 48 项研究符合纳入标准,共纳入 2232 名受试者。纳入研究中的编码产生了 30 个关键描述性主题,其编码主题频率大于 10%。编码主题适用于四个相互关联的障碍,这些障碍推动了优先人群的不平等:社会、行为、经济和技术/接口。因此:本研究强调了需要加强医患关系,以减轻不同群体参与 FOBT 筛查的障碍。研究结果可以帮助卫生专业人员和政策制定者通过超越个人责任,关注驱动低价值观念的信息不对称,解决优先人群在癌症筛查中被系统排除的问题。

相似文献

1
Social determinants and participation in fecal occult blood test based colorectal cancer screening: A qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis.社会决定因素与粪便潜血试验在结直肠癌筛查中的参与:定性系统评价和荟萃综合。
Health Promot J Austr. 2024 Jan;35(1):9-36. doi: 10.1002/hpja.732. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
3
Chemoprevention of colorectal cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation.结直肠癌的化学预防:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Jun;14(32):1-206. doi: 10.3310/hta14320.
4
A systematic review of clinic and community intervention to increase fecal testing for colorectal cancer in rural and low-income populations in the United States - How, what and when?美国农村和低收入人群结直肠癌粪便检测的临床和社区干预的系统评价 - 如何、什么和何时?
BMC Cancer. 2018 Jan 6;18(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3813-4.
5
Guaiac-based faecal occult blood tests versus faecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer screening in average-risk individuals.基于愈创木脂的粪便潜血试验与粪便免疫化学试验用于一般风险人群结直肠癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 6;6(6):CD009276. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009276.pub2.
6
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
7
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
8
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
9
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.针对女性的干预措施,以鼓励她们接受宫颈癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD002834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub3.
10
Are medication restrictions before FOBT necessary?: practical advice based on a systematic review of the literature.行 FOBT 检查前是否需要限制用药?:基于文献系统评价的实用建议。
Can Fam Physician. 2012 Sep;58(9):939-48.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors influencing colorectal cancer screening decisions among Saudi women: A qualitative study.沙特女性结直肠癌筛查决策的影响因素:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 7;20(4):e0321086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321086. eCollection 2025.