Suppr超能文献

额颞叶痴呆和阿尔茨海默病患者面部表情识别的错误特征

Error profiles of facial emotion recognition in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease.

作者信息

Gressie Kimberly, Kumfor Fiona, Teng Her, Foxe David, Devenney Emma, Ahmed Rebekah M, Piguet Olivier

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, The University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

The University of Sydney, Brain and Mind Centre, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Int Psychogeriatr. 2024 Jun;36(6):455-464. doi: 10.1017/S1041610223000297. Epub 2023 Apr 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To identify the patterns of errors in facial emotion recognition in frontotemporal dementia (FTD) subtypes compared with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and healthy controls.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis.

SETTING

Participants were recruited from FRONTIER, the frontotemporal dementia research group at the University of Sydney, Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 356 participants (behavioral-variant FTD (bvFTD): 62, semantic dementia (SD)-left: 29, SD-right: 14, progressive non-fluent aphasia (PNFA): 21, AD: 76, controls: 90) were included.

MEASUREMENTS

Facial emotion recognition was assessed using the Facial Affect Selection Task, a word-face matching task measuring recognition of the six basic emotions (anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and surprise), as well as neutral emotion, portrayed by black and white faces.

RESULTS

Overall, all clinical groups performed significantly worse than controls with the exception of the PNFA subgroup ( = .051). The SD-right group scored worse than all other clinical groups (all values < .027) and the bvFTD subgroup performed worse than the PNFA group ( < .001). The most frequent errors were in response to the facial emotions (26.1%) and (22.9%). The primary error response to each target emotion was identified; patterns of errors were similar across all clinical groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Facial emotion recognition is impaired in FTD and AD compared to healthy controls. Within FTD, bvFTD and SD-right are particularly impaired. Dementia groups cannot be distinguished based on error responses alone. Implications for future clinical diagnosis and research are discussed.

摘要

目的

确定与阿尔茨海默病(AD)及健康对照相比,额颞叶痴呆(FTD)各亚型面部情绪识别中的错误模式。

设计

回顾性分析。

研究地点

参与者来自澳大利亚悉尼大学额颞叶痴呆研究组FRONTIER。

参与者

共纳入356名参与者(行为变异型FTD(bvFTD):62例,语义性痴呆(SD)-左侧:29例,SD-右侧:14例,进行性非流利性失语(PNFA):21例,AD:76例,对照:90例)。

测量方法

使用面部表情选择任务评估面部情绪识别,这是一项词-脸匹配任务,用于测量对六种基本情绪(愤怒、厌恶、恐惧、快乐、悲伤和惊讶)以及由黑白面孔描绘的中性情绪的识别。

结果

总体而言,除PNFA亚组外(P = 0.051),所有临床组的表现均显著差于对照组。SD-右侧组的得分低于所有其他临床组(所有P值<0.027),bvFTD亚组的表现比PNFA组差(P<0.001)。最常见的错误是对面部情绪悲伤(26.1%)和惊讶(22.9%)的反应。确定了对每种目标情绪的主要错误反应;所有临床组的错误模式相似。

结论

与健康对照相比,FTD和AD患者的面部情绪识别受损。在FTD中,bvFTD和SD-右侧型尤其受损。仅根据错误反应无法区分痴呆组。讨论了对未来临床诊断和研究的意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验