Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2023 Apr-Jun;71(2):139-152. doi: 10.1080/00207144.2023.2194934.
A recent survey conducted by the Society of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis Task Force for Efficacy Standards in Hypnosis Research found that clinicians reported using one or more of several different styles of hypnosis in their work. The most common of these was Ericksonian, used by over 2/3rds of clinicians, followed by hypnotic relaxation therapy and traditional hypnosis. Surprisingly, a little less than a 3rd of respondents indicated using the evidence-based practice of hypnotherapy. The present paper discusses these findings from the perspective of optimal survey methodology, examines areas of differences and overlap among response options, and considers the question of the evidence base for the practice of clinical hypnosis.
最近由临床和实验催眠学会任务组进行的一项关于催眠研究疗效标准的调查发现，临床医生报告在他们的工作中使用了一种或多种不同风格的催眠。其中最常见的是由超过 2/3 的临床医生使用的埃里克森催眠，其次是催眠放松疗法和传统催眠。令人惊讶的是，不到三分之一的受访者表示使用基于证据的催眠治疗实践。本文从最佳调查方法的角度讨论了这些发现，检查了应答选项之间的差异和重叠的领域，并考虑了临床催眠实践的证据基础问题。
