IEEAC Dept. (ESI-UCLM), P de la Universidad 4, Ciudad Real, 13071, Spain.
IEEAC Dept. (ETSII-UCLM), Avda. Camilo José Cela s/n, Ciudad Real, 13071, Spain.
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2023 Jun;235:107528. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107528. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
This paper presents the quantitative comparison of three generative models of digital staining, also known as virtual staining, in H&E modality (i.e., Hematoxylin and Eosin) that are applied to 5 types of breast tissue. Moreover, a qualitative evaluation of the results achieved with the best model was carried out. This process is based on images of samples without staining captured by a multispectral microscope with previous dimensional reduction to three channels in the RGB range.
The models compared are based on conditional GAN (pix2pix) which uses images aligned with/without staining, and two models that do not require image alignment, Cycle GAN (cycleGAN) and contrastive learning-based model (CUT). These models are compared based on the structural similarity and chromatic discrepancy between samples with chemical staining and their corresponding ones with digital staining. The correspondence between images is achieved after the chemical staining images are subjected to digital unstaining by means of a model obtained to guarantee the cyclic consistency of the generative models.
The comparison of the three models corroborates the visual evaluation of the results showing the superiority of cycleGAN both for its larger structural similarity with respect to chemical staining (mean value of SSIM ∼ 0.95) and lower chromatic discrepancy (10%). To this end, quantization and calculation of EMD (Earth Mover's Distance) between clusters is used. In addition, quality evaluation through subjective psychophysical tests with three experts was carried out to evaluate quality of the results with the best model (cycleGAN).
The results can be satisfactorily evaluated by metrics that use as reference image a chemically stained sample and the digital staining images of the reference sample with prior digital unstaining. These metrics demonstrate that generative staining models that guarantee cyclic consistency provide the closest results to chemical H&E staining that also is consistent with the result of qualitative evaluation by experts.
本文比较了三种数字染色(也称为虚拟染色)生成模型在 H&E 模式(即苏木精和伊红)下对 5 种乳腺组织的定量表现。此外,还对最佳模型的结果进行了定性评估。该过程基于多光谱显微镜拍摄的未经染色的样本图像,这些图像经过先前的降维处理,降为 RGB 范围内的三个通道。
所比较的模型基于条件生成对抗网络(pix2pix),该网络使用有/无染色的图像进行对齐,以及两个不需要图像对齐的模型,即循环生成对抗网络(cycleGAN)和基于对比学习的模型(CUT)。这些模型是基于具有化学染色和相应数字染色的样本之间的结构相似性和色度差异进行比较的。通过获得的模型对化学染色图像进行数字去染色,实现了图像之间的对应关系,以保证生成模型的循环一致性。
对三种模型的比较证实了对结果的视觉评估,表明 cycleGAN 在其与化学染色的更大结构相似性(结构相似性均值 SSIM∼0.95)和更低的色度差异(10%)方面具有优越性。为此,使用量化和计算聚类之间的 EMD(Earth Mover's Distance)来进行。此外,通过三位专家进行主观心理物理测试对质量进行了评估,以评估最佳模型(cycleGAN)的结果质量。
可以使用将化学染色样本作为参考图像,并对参考样本进行数字去染色后的数字染色图像作为参考的指标来对结果进行令人满意的评估。这些指标表明,保证循环一致性的生成染色模型提供了最接近化学 H&E 染色的结果,这也与专家的定性评估结果一致。